Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Secular Spectrum

Home
Nonreligious
Your Vote May Be Worth Millions!

Your Vote May Be Worth Millions!

Last updated on: November 2, 2016 at 4:03 pm by Gleb Tsipursky

Your Vote May Be Worth Millions! 2016-11-02T16:03:44-05:00 Gleb Tsipursky

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Caption: Surprised Woman (Ohiane Abriteska, Flickr)

Is it worth your time to vote? You might be surprised to learn that your vote may be worth millions of dollars!

This goes against our intuitive assumptions. Indeed, many claim that voting is an irrational act. The chance of actually influencing an election is very small. Why should you spend your valuable time doing something that has very little impact? Unfortunately, those making such claims are not looking at the math of how much your vote is really worth. The rational way to evaluate the impact of your vote is to take a probabilistic thinking approach that considers not simply the likelihood of influencing an election, but also the possible impact of doing so, and multiply the two to evaluate whether it is worthwhile to vote.

Research shows that individual voters in an election that is not very close have an average of 1 in 60 million chance of being the decisive vote, and closer to 1 in 10 million for swing states. In a closer election, such as the 2016 one, scholars found that the average voter has a 1 in 10 million chance of being decisive, and 1 in a million for swing states.

This does not seem very high. What makes your vote worth thousands?

To see what your vote is worth, we need to look at the federal budget. In 2015, the federal budget was $3.8 trillion. Assuming the same budget over the four years of a presidency, the next US President would influence 4 X $3.8 trillion = $15.2 trillion.

How much of a difference is there between the way that Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump would spend this money? They have radically different policy approaches. We can estimate that they differ on how they would spend at least 75% of this money. Thus, the difference would be $15.2 trillion X .75 = $11.4 trillion. You can plug in your own numbers, of course, if you think they differ by more or less than 75%.

While candidates make big promises about their policies, they often have difficulties enacting their agenda once they get into office. To account for this, we can make a guesstimate of how much of their policy the candidates would be able to enact. For the purposes of this calculation, let us assume they would be able to enact only one-third of what they actually wanted. So we would multiply $11.4 trillion X .333 = $3.8 trillion. Again, you are welcome to use your own numbers here.

We can now evaluate how much your vote matters in federal budget dollars. Since this election looks close, we will multiply the probability of an average American’s vote making a difference in a close election, one in 10 million, by the amount of money at stake in this election, $3.8 trillion: 1/10 million * $3.8 trillion = $380,000. For a swing state, your vote makes an even bigger difference: 1/million * $3.8 trillion = $3,800,000.

These numbers, of course, only captures the aspect of your vote that relates to the federal budget. There are many other less tangible but not less important voting outcomes. For instance, the next President will appoint a new Supreme Court justice, which will make a big impact. Another factor to consider is social policies, such as abortion or gay rights or policies toward Muslims.

To account for these, you can add a modifier to the more concrete numbers for the federal budget. For instance, if you see these non-budget factors as about 75% as important, your modifier would be 1.75. That makes the value of a vote for an average American $380 * 1.75 = $664,000 and $6,640,000 for one in a swing state. You are welcome to set your own modifier.

So the actual value of your vote is at least in the hundreds of thousands. Of course, this money will be distributed over the American population, and not go into your own pocket. If you only care about your own interests, without any concern for the welfare of others, you may choose to avoid voting. However, if you care about other people and not only yourself, voting makes rational sense, as research demonstrates. By voting, you are performing an act of charity that is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

____________________________________________________________________

Want to make sure I keep writing? Support me on Patreon!

Bio: Dr. Gleb Tsipursky is an author, speaker, consultant, coach, scholar, and social entrepreneur specializing in science-based strategies for effective decision-making, goal achievement, emotional and social intelligence, meaning and purpose, and altruism – for more information or to hire him, see his website, GlebTsipursky.com. He runs a nonprofit that helps people use science-based strategies to make effective decisions and reach their goals, so as to build an altruistic and flourishing world, Intentional Insights. He also serves as a tenure-track professor at Ohio State in the History of Behavioral Science and the Decision Sciences Collaborative, and published over 25 peer-reviewed articles. A best-selling author, he wrote Find Your Purpose Using Science among other books, and regular contributes to prominent venues, such as Time, The Conversation, Salon, The Huffington Post, and elsewhere. He appears regularly on network TV, such as affiliates of ABC and Fox, radio stations such as NPR and Sunny 95, as well as internet-only media such as podcasts and videocasts.

Consider signing up to the Intentional Insights newsletter; volunteering; donating; buying merchandise. Get in touch with him at gleb (at) intentionalinsights (dot) org.

Activism

communication

compassionate humanism

Previous Post

November 1, 2016

Life's Most Incredible Events Explained (Just a Coincidence?)

Next Post

November 6, 2016 The Myth of the Irrational Voter

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ableism Activism Addiction and Recovery Agnosticism Anti-intellectualism Arts Atheism Beauty Catholicism Charles Darwin Children China Christianity Church/State separation churchgoing communication compassionate humanism Creationism critical thinking Culture death disaster response doubt education Egypt Entertainment Environment ethics evolution Existence of God Exploration fear Foundation Beyond Belief Free speech God Health History Human rights humanism identity India Interfaith Islam labels Language LGBT Love Meaning Media Medicine Middle East misconceptions mixed belief marriage Moral argument Morality Myths Near-Death Experience Nonreligious parenting Parody Persecution complex Philosophy Poetry Politics prayer Psychology Rationality Religion religious atheists Religious privilege Republican Party Satire Schools science secular parenting Spirituality The Unpigeonholeables Uncategorized United Kingdom Wonder

Select a Month March 2021 August 2020 March 2020 January 2020 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 June 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Lord, I believe; help my unbelief!"

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Mary The father of a sick boy Thomas