Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

The Secular Spectrum

Catching the rainbow

Last updated on: October 8, 2015 at 11:23 am   by Dale McGowan

Catching the rainbow 2015-10-08T11:23:24-05:00 Dale McGowan

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

rainbowwood

| By Dale McGowan |

Our family has a longstanding relationship with the speed of light. We take care never to exceed it, for one thing, no matter how tempting. But there’s more than that.

I had all sorts of light-related fascinations when I was a kid — that light had a speed at all, and that it was so unimaginably fast, yet also finite and measurable. I knew the moon was a light-second away, the sun eight light-minutes, and Proxima Centauri, the nearest star, 4.2 light years. I knew that the Milky Way, one galaxy of billions, is 100,000 light years side to side.

Light helped me finally grasp the real immensity of the universe and my own incredible smallness.

Light is SO much faster than sound — almost a million times faster — which is why lightning is already kicking back with a light beer when thunder comes panting up behind.

This stuff gave me endless fodder for discussion on first dates. It also cut down on second dates.

When it came time to marry, I limited contenders to those with no more than two degrees of separation from the speed of light. Fortunately my college friend Becca attended the same high school as Nobel laureate Albert Michelson, he of the Michelson-Morley experiment, which laid the groundwork for special relativity by showing that light always travels at the same speed, even if you are moving rapidly toward or away from the source.

Becca and I were married in a San Francisco church with You-Know-What streaming through the windows.

Our kids have picked up the thread. As we drove home from his football practice years ago, my son Connor (then 12) asked why time slows down as you go faster. (The previous week we had discussed the very cool Hafele-Keating experiment in which cesium clocks flown around the world differed from identical clocks on the ground by a few nanoseconds. I think I spotted the exact moment during the practice that he was thinking about Hafele-Keating instead of Offensive-Lineman.)

I said our velocity through space plus our velocity through time equals the speed of light, so the faster you go through space, the slower you necessarily go through time.

He stared out the window for five seconds, then said, “So light doesn’t experience time, then.”

Boom. I’d never thought of it. Turns out he was right.

A few years later, standing in the dark waiting for the school bus, I learned that I’d never shared with Delaney (then 9) the cool fact that many of the stars we see probably aren’t there anymore. Some may have blinked out millennia ago, but the end of the column of photons, even at 186,000 miles a second, still hasn’t reached us. I told her that tomorrow morning we might see a new bright star in the sky called a nova, which means “new,” even though the star isn’t really being born, it’s dying. Or was dying thousands of years ago, and is brightest to us now even though it might actually be completely gone.

Looking up, she made all those astonished, comprehending sounds I’d come to love, and the bus arrived.

On the heels of the 2011 announcement that the speed of light might have been exceeded by neutrinos at CERN, my wife Becca took the opportunity to give her second graders a little insight into how science works. “All these years we thought light was the fastest thing possible,” she said. “Even Albert Einstein said that was true. Now maybe, just maybe, scientists have found that it’s possible for something to go even faster. First they have to test and test again to be sure, and if it is, they’ll say, ‘Wow, we were wrong. We have to change our minds.'”

Second grade is not too soon to start saying that out loud.

It’s true that we’re capable of upending our Newtons and Einsteins when the evidence insists, but of course it never happens quite as gladly as we sometimes claim. Individual scientists are just as prone as the rest of us to kick and scream and bite to protect their favorite conclusions, until the collective enterprise of science itself busts them upside the head. The important message for these second graders, though, is that science contains the ability, the means, even the willingness to change its conclusions in light of new evidence, despite whatever preferences individual scientists might have. (The CERN scientists assumed they had made an error in measurement, which it turned out they had. They kicked the side of the accelerator a few times, and neutrinos were once again obeying the posted limit.)

All this light conversation brought me back to experiments I conducted around age seven, just inside my front door in St. Louis. The beveled edge of the glass on our front storm door formed a little prism, which at a certain time of day threw a tiny, intense rainbow on the floor.

I decided I was going to catch that rainbow. In a shoebox.

In what may be a perfect illustration of the seven-year-old mind, I knew I’d have to move faster than light to do this, and that light is the fastest thing there is. So it would be really hard.

I found a shoebox and held it above the rainbow. I slowed my breathing and concentrated…then CLOMP! brought the box down.

Too slow. The damn thing was on top of the box.

I’d do this for a good half hour at a time before giving up — but only for that day. I remember thinking maybe light was a little slower in the winter, which is why it was colder then. So I tried again in January, by which time the rainbow, knowing I was after it, was in a different spot on the floor. Even then, it was always just a liiiittle faster than I was, and the rainbow appeared on top of the box.

I eventually gave up my dream of catching the rainbow. But maybe CERN made a mistake about their mistake, and I just need to find a box made of neutrinos to get back in the game.

A version of this post first appeared at The Meming of Life

science

Previous Post



September 30, 2015

The Planned Parenthood Debate 101: What You Need to Know

Next Post



October 8, 2015 The Southern Baptist Cafeteria


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Ableism Activism Addiction and Recovery Agnosticism Anti-intellectualism Arts Atheism Beauty Catholicism Charles Darwin Children China Christianity Church/State separation churchgoing communication compassionate humanism Creationism critical thinking Culture death disaster response doubt education Egypt Entertainment Environment ethics evolution Existence of God Exploration fear Foundation Beyond Belief Free speech God Health History Human rights humanism identity India Interfaith Islam labels Language LGBT Love Meaning Media Medicine Middle East misconceptions mixed belief marriage Moral argument Morality Myths Near-Death Experience Nonreligious parenting Parody Persecution complex Philosophy Poetry Politics prayer Psychology Rationality Religion religious atheists Religious privilege Republican Party Satire Schools science secular parenting Spirituality The Unpigeonholeables Uncategorized United Kingdom Wonder

Select a Month March 2021 August 2020 March 2020 January 2020 September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 April 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 June 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who denied Jesus three times before the rooster crowed?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Paul Judas Peter

Related posts from The Secular Spectrum

Nonreligious

Despite "Pro-Life" Claims, Stem Cell Therapy Has Very...

The Secular Spectrum

Nonreligious

On Cognitive Dissonance and the Thought Patterns Behind...

The Secular Spectrum

Nonreligious

Reaching 'Faith Healers' Is an Urgent Public Health...

The Secular Spectrum

Nonreligious

Storytelling while Secular: Writing about Loss in an...

The Secular Spectrum

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube