Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

To Give a Defense

Home
Catholic
Where is the Baby Now? Fr. Frank Pavone’s Words are Inconsistent.

Where is the Baby Now? Fr. Frank Pavone’s Words are Inconsistent.

Last updated on: March 10, 2018 at 6:19 pm by Scott Eric Alt

Where is the Baby Now? Fr. Frank Pavone’s Words are Inconsistent. 2018-03-10T18:19:36-04:00 Scott Eric Alt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Fr. Frank Pavone can’t seem to keep his story straight. Here—and I have removed from it the image of the aborted baby—is the original post at Priests for Life’s Facebook page. (PFL has since removed said post, but I and others wisely retained a screenshot of it.)

“Entrusted to us by a pathologist for burial” the post says. So let me understand. A pathologist gave Priests for Life the body of an aborted child, in the belief that Fr. Pavone would bury it. But before that could happen, he (Fr. Pavone) decided to place it on an altar, light some candles, bring in some video cameras, and make a campaign commercial for Donald Trump. Such forethought this man of God has. And later, his bishop condemned the incident and started an investigation.

Okay. So far so good. (Well, maybe not “good.”) But what happened to the baby? Was it buried?

That’s where things get a little confusing. Stay with me, now. I plead your patience.

As Keith Michael Estrada reports here at Patheos Catholic, Fr. Pavone’s first said, in a video on November 8, that the baby had indeed been buried.

PFL has since removed the video from Facebook, and no one seems to know why. Fr. Pavone has no answer for us. Perhaps he said to himself, “Wait, that baby wasn’t buried after all. Silly me. How could I have thought that it was? I’m getting confused. But now I remember. I better remove that video–you know, in order to be an honest man”?

Your guess is as good as mine. I only ask.

“I’ve already celebrated that baby’s funeral,” Fr. Pavone said. The baby, he said, is now “laid to rest.”

Oh. He–Fr. Pavone himself–celebrated a funeral and buried a baby. Hm. Where? When? What cemetery? Would Bishop Zurek of the Diocese of Amarillo look into these matters?

Because, funny thing, but Peter Jesserer Smith at the National Catholic Register writes today that Fr. Pavone’s story has changed. Somewhat. Slightly. Just a little.

Fr. Pavone is now saying that the pathologist—remember him? the personage who, Fr. insists, gave Priests for Life the body for burial—actually gave the body to a Protestant pastor for burial, and he decided to contact Fr. Pavone so that Priests for Life could turn the corpse into a little publicity for Donald Trump. Doing due diligence, he (Fr. Pavone) returned the body to the Protestant pastor, and God only knows what he did with it, Fr. Pavone is washing his hands—you know, kind of like Pilate?—he ain’t responsible for any of this.

I kid you not. Go over to the Register. Fr. Pavone said all this to them. Smith writes:

Father Pavone told the Register that the baby was temporarily entrusted to Priests for Life “through a Protestant pastor who obtained it through a pathologist who obtained it from an abortion facility.” …

According to Father Pavone, he put the pastor in touch with a funeral home for burial. But the baby’s body had not been laid to rest after the service, as Father Pavone revealed the minister reached out to him some time later.

“As the election proceeded and intensified, he indicated to me that the baby was still under his auspices, so to speak; he had access to the body,” Father Pavone continued. “We talked again about showing people again the reality of the aborted child, and so we did that.”

Father Pavone did not identify the pastor, and he declined to provide a general time frame that would indicate when these conservations took place, which he felt might identify him.

On the videos, Father Pavone said the pathologist “entrusted [the baby’s body] to us for burial.” However, Father Pavone told the Register he did not know when the baby would be buried. He said the body was out of his hands and back with the Protestant minister.

Now, wait. A Protestant pastor—Fr. Pavone ain’t telling us who he or she is—originally got the baby. (But I thought Fr. Pavone’s first story, you know, before his bishop got wind of it and rebuked him and started an investigation and Fr. Pavone removed the post from Facebook, was that the pathologist gave the body to Priests for Life. Now we hear that it was really a Protestant pastor, name unknown?

And the Protestant pastor, rather than burying the body, decided to keep it around for a while while he kept a check on how the election was going. And when it turned out that Donald Trump needed a corpse trotted out the weekend before the first Tuesday in November, the Protestant pastor (name unknown) decided to contact Fr. Pavone, because Fr. Pavone knows how to take care of these things, and place a corpse (that’s been laying around for who knows how long?) upon the altar of sacrifice, light some candles, bring in the video cameras, hit record, and make a little commercial.

And Fr. Pavone, who first said that he had the funeral, the baby’s been buried, now says that he really returned it to the Protestant pastor in question (name unknown), and Fr. Pavone has no idea where it is now, it’s out of his hands.

Would Bishop Zurek look into this, please? 806-383-2243. Or e-mail him, dear reader.

I am not letting this story go.

***

Previous Post

November 11, 2016

How Long Has Fr. Frank Pavone Had that Fetus?

Next Post

November 15, 2016 Is Criticizing Priests Forbidden to Catholics? In Fact, We Have a Right To.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion About Me Answers for Calvinists Answers to Media Fictions Answers to Objections Anti-Catholicism Apologetics Apostolic Succession Atonement Authority of the Church Baptism Benedictines Biblical Exegesis Blogging Book Reviews Books & Writing &c. Calvin's Institutes Capital Punishment Catholic Church Chastity Christology Church Fathers Church Social Doctrine Confession Contraception Conversion Stories Crusades Debates Depression & Suicide Deuterocanon Development of Doctrine Ecumenism English Language Eucharistic Adoration Exorcism Extra Ecclesiam Fisks & Rebuttals Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Fundamentalism Gender Politics Gender Theory Good Works Homosexuality Humor Idolatry Immaculate Conception In the News Inquisition ISIS Islam Just for Fun Just War Justification LCWR Limbo Liturgical Abuse Liturgical Year Magisterium Marriage and Family Mary Mortal Sin New Evangelization NFP Papacy Papal Documents Papal Infallibility Personal Narrative Politics Pope Francis Pope Francis Derangement Syndrome Population Control Praying to the "Dead" Priesthood Primacy of Peter Protestant Denominations Purgatory Radical Islam Radical Traditionalists Real Presence Right to Conscience RIght to Life Saints Same-Sex "Marriage" Seven Quick Takes Social Justice Social Media Sola Scriptura Spirit of Vatican II SSPX The Eucharist The Mass The Resurrection Traditionalism Vatican II Year of Mercy

Select a Month August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 May 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book contains the "Song of Deborah"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

1 Samuel Exodus Ruth Judges