Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

To Give a Defense

Seven Quick Takes in Defense of Longhand: 7QT X Seriatim

Last updated on: March 9, 2017 at 4:13 pm   by Scott Eric Alt

Seven Quick Takes in Defense of Longhand: 7QT X Seriatim 2017-03-09T16:13:42-04:00 Scott Eric Alt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Charles Dickens in 1858 (George Herbert Watkins, public domain)

Charles Dickens in 1858 (George Herbert Watkins, public domain)

Computer crashes helped me to regain my normal and native sanity about how to write. A time there was, and ever a good time, when I wrote everything by hand and raged, raged against the dying of the light. I wrote every term paper in graduate school by hand, and by hand revised. It felt natural thus; and I retained a record of all my corrections.(Which I would promptly show to my students as an example of what revision is.) The visual does matter; and the startling impact of it is lost when comparing an early, clean draft with a later, clean draft. I still marvel at how the printer ever deciphered the handwriting, with all the elaborate corrections, of Charles Dickens. (Dickens never wrote a clean copy for the printer. Imagine that!)

 

I.

As for me, I did stop imagining that. I stopped not long after I switched to writing—and revising—entirely on the computer. I wanted the ease of revision that a word processor could achieve. I could shuffle paragraphs here and there without the need to draw—and later follow—elaborate boxes and arrows. I actually congratulated myself for such inexcusable sloppiness. It looked neater; it felt quicker: Thus I deluded myself.

But it is not, in fact, quicker or easier when you lose two hours’ work to a computer crash, or a freeze, or a power surge, and have to reconstruct those beautiful sentences (for they are beautiful, in the idealistic memory of forgotten words) cold. No matter how many times one justifies the risk by appealing to backups, and backups of backups, having a handwritten copy is the only real surety against e-Alexandria.

But what about fire? you say. Or theft? These never have happened. But a crash, a freeze, a power surge? I should have a penny.

 

II.

Computers, in my experience, distract from the writing more often than they aid. Even with the ease of revision and the speed of getting the words down, my attention wanders with an abandon that should be sedated.

Someone IMs me on Facebook.

The dashboard in WordPress does some crazy thing; or else I hit an erroneous key and my formatting is ruined beyond sane repair.

The computer dings and whistles. Or, it harasses me with the breathless message that an update is now available. Do I want to update now or be reminded again in five seconds?

What was I trying to write?

Thus these things distract my train from thinking and me from the task at hand: seeking the pith of an idea. No such distractions exist when writing longhand. I turn the computer off; I abandon Facebook to the four winds, I save my fights with WordPress for when the post is writ and the thinking thought.

 

III.

The vile Dell off, and pen in hand, I can focus on words to the exclusion of all else.

And it feels more like writing, to me, when I can have this tactile connection to a physical object. I can hold a pen. I can shake it, tap it onto the page or my head to dredge a thought, or bite it to mull. It feels more like I am writing when I can look at a page and scratch out a line and try a different set of words; and if that does not work, scratch out and try again. Or, I can write several options in the margin. I am, this way, physically connected to words; they are not out in the cyber-ether, but rather my hand gave them shape. I create with a little pressure of the whole hand, clasped.

 

IV.

In my print, or cursive, is personality. Look at any manuscript—George MacDonald or Charles Dickens, or Jane Austen, or Lewis Carroll—and you will see the physicality of the writer. How much would be lost to us if we no longer had those? How much, if Dickens looked like Austen looked like Carroll?

 

V.

Paper does not perish with anything like the speed of an e-file. If I did not have my original handwritten copies of all the term papers I wrote in graduate school, I would not be able to retrieve them from the floppy disks I stored them on. Blogs are ephemeral, as are backup files on a server, but my print and my page last. (As do real books.)

E-space is not superior to real space. We still have the original Declaration of Independence. And the Magna Carta. And Greek manuscripts of the Bible.

 

VI.

I do not claim that electronic technology does not serve a purpose. Surely it makes people’s writing available to a larger amount of people, at speed and at convenience.

But it cannot replace the process of writing simply because it is a convenient and beneficial form (in this age) for a finished product.

 

VII.

If you write, you may have a different view than I do, but I have found that my writing is in fact better when I write longhand. My style is more fluid, my sentences less abrupt, less choppy. Perhaps that is because my ability to experiment with sentence structure in the margins, and my physical connection to the words I write, and the fewer distractions, all increase my attentiveness to the rhythm of sentences and paragraphs. Perhaps I get lost more in the flow of words than I do when trenched in the divided multitasks of a computer.

Give me paper until my fingers fall off and my blood stops and all the world turns dark.

 


Read more of this week’s quick takes at Conversion Diary here.

***

If you like the content on this blog, your generous gift to the author helps to keep it active. I remember all my supporters in my Mass intentions each week.

About Me

Books & Writing &c.

Seven Quick Takes

Previous Post



January 16, 2014

Desperate John Bugay to Catholics: Shut Up About Sola Scriptura

Next Post



January 20, 2014 Through the Year With Pope Francis


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion About Me Answers for Calvinists Answers to Media Fictions Answers to Objections Anti-Catholicism Apologetics Apostolic Succession Atonement Authority of the Church Baptism Benedictines Biblical Exegesis Blogging Book Reviews Books & Writing &c. Calvin's Institutes Capital Punishment Catholic Church Chastity Christology Church Fathers Church Social Doctrine Confession Contraception Conversion Stories Crusades Debates Depression & Suicide Deuterocanon Development of Doctrine Ecumenism English Language Eucharistic Adoration Exorcism Extra Ecclesiam Fisks & Rebuttals Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Fundamentalism Gender Politics Gender Theory Good Works Homosexuality Humor Idolatry Immaculate Conception In the News Inquisition ISIS Islam Just for Fun Just War Justification LCWR Limbo Liturgical Abuse Liturgical Year Magisterium Marriage and Family Mary Mortal Sin New Evangelization NFP Papacy Papal Documents Papal Infallibility Personal Narrative Politics Pope Francis Pope Francis Derangement Syndrome Population Control Praying to the "Dead" Priesthood Primacy of Peter Protestant Denominations Purgatory Radical Islam Radical Traditionalists Real Presence Right to Conscience RIght to Life Saints Same-Sex "Marriage" Seven Quick Takes Social Justice Social Media Sola Scriptura Spirit of Vatican II SSPX The Eucharist The Mass The Resurrection Traditionalism Vatican II Year of Mercy

Select a Month August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 May 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Shema" mean in Hebrew?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Wait Hear Pray Obey

Related posts from To Give a Defense

Catholic

Is Premarital Kissing a Sin? and Other Quick...

To Give a Defense

Catholic

Seven Reasons to Vote for Donald Trump. 7QT...

To Give a Defense

Catholic

No, Virginia, Blogs are Not the Magisterium. 7QT...

To Give a Defense

Catholic

How I Write. 7QT XX Seriatim.

To Give a Defense

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube