Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

To Give a Defense

Home
Catholic
Rick Santorum Should Read the Transcript of Pope Francis’s “Rabbits” Remark. So Should Everyone Else.

Rick Santorum Should Read the Transcript of Pope Francis’s “Rabbits” Remark. So Should Everyone Else.

Last updated on: March 9, 2017 at 1:19 am by Scott Eric Alt

Rick Santorum Should Read the Transcript of Pope Francis’s “Rabbits” Remark. So Should Everyone Else. 2017-03-09T01:19:29-04:00 Scott Eric Alt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore, Creative Commons

On Mediaite, Matt Wilstein reports that Rick Santorum “did not appreciate” Pope Francis’s recent comments about Catholics and rabbits. “It’s sometimes very difficult to listen to the pope,” Mr. Santorum said in a radio interview with Hugh Hewitt. He continued:

Maybe he’s speaking to people in the third world, but the problem certainly in most of the Catholic world is not procreation. I mean, in Europe in particular, you have birth rates that are only over, just a little over one for every two people. So this isn’t a global problem, and I don’t know what the Pope was referring to.

Here’s a case where a simple check of the transcript would help everybody, not just Mr. Santorum. For Pope Francis made that very point himself—twice. Here’s the first.

The refusal of Paul VI [to ease the Catholic teaching on birth control] was not only to the personal problems, for which he will tell the confessors to be merciful and understand the situation and pardon. Being understanding and merciful, no? But he was watching the universal Neo-Malthusianism that was in progress. And, how do you call this Neo-Malthusianism? There is less than one percent of birth rate growth in Italy. The same in Spain. That Neo-Malthusianism that sought to control humanity on the part of the powers.

By “Neo-Malthusianism,” the pope is referring to the idea that there needs to be population control—an idea which he rejects.

Here’s the second time the pope speaks words like that.

I think the number of three children per family that you mentioned—it makes me suffer—I think it is the number experts say is important to keep the population going. Three per couple. When this decreases, the other extreme happens, like what is happening in Italy. I have heard, I do not know if it is true, that in 2024 there will be no money to pay pensioners because of the fall in population. Therefore, the key word, to give you an answer, and the one the Church uses all the time, and I do too, is responsible parenthood. How do we do this? With dialogue. Each person with his pastor seeks how to do carry out a responsible parenthood.

So Pope Francis is just as concerned about falling populations in Europe as Rick Santorum is. One read through the actual transcript would have told him that. The pope praises large families. Couples must always be open to life, he says.

Of course, a look a the transcript would also clarify the true sense of the pope’s remark about rabbits. Here it is; it comes right after the last paragraph I just quoted.

God gives you means to be responsible. Some think that—excuse the language—that in order to be good Catholics, we have to be like rabbits. No. Responsible parenthood.

So the pope does not say here that Catholics “should not breed like rabbits”; in fact, he does not use the word “breed” at all. What he says is that Catholics should not feel that they must “be like rabbits” with no sense of “responsible parenthood.” In his replies, the pope gives the full Catholic teaching. He does not just say that life is good and that couples should bring life into the world, and life more abundantly; he also says that couples have an obligation to be responsible with their parenthood. The Church says both.

In fairness, Mr. Santorum is not the only one getting the pope’s words wrong. Everyone else is too. The media tends to report half of the pope’s words as though the other half did not exist; and then, when they are forced to discover the other half, they feign shock.

Here is Mr. Wilstein in the same article in Mediaite.

In an unprecedented statement to reporters during his flight from the Philippines to Rome, the Pope suggested that Catholics could take measures to limit the number of children they have.

Unprecedented? I’m sorry, Mr. Wilstein, but that kind of statement shows that you have no idea what you are talking about. The Church has talked about Natural Family Planning and responsible parenthood for a long time. See the USCCB here and John Paul II in 1984 here and Pope Paul VI in 1968 here (§16). Well, in fact, here are Paul VI’s words.

If therefore there are well-grounded reasons for spacing births, arising from the physical or psychological condition of husband or wife, or from external circumstances, the Church teaches that married people may then take advantage of the natural cycles immanent in the reproductive system and engage in marital intercourse only during those times that are infertile, thus controlling birth in a way which does not in the least offend the moral principles which we have just explained.

The pope’s remarks were no more “unprecedented” than the media, or a politician, getting the pope and the Church wrong. These things happen every day. What’s sad is that no one seems to much try. Anna Matranga, writing for CBS here, is one of many today reporting that the pope has somehow “changed his mind” or is “walking back” his words in the interview. The papal quotation they are using to support this claim is this one.

It gives consolation and hope to see so many numerous families who receive children as a real gift of God. They know that every child is a benediction.

No again. I’m sorry to have to point this out, but the pope said that very same thing in the interview. There is nothing new here. Here, again, is what the pope had already said in the first place.

Another curious thing in relation to this is that for the most poor people, a child is a treasure. It is true that you have to be prudent here too, but for them a child is a treasure. Some would say ‘God knows how to help me’ and perhaps some of them are not prudent, this is true. Responsible paternity, but let us also look at the generosity of that father and mother who see a treasure in every child.

“A child is a treasure”: the pope says it three times in just this one reply. And there are many other times in the interview when he remarks on what a great gift a child is.

Does no one, anywhere, ever, make even the least effort to get the facts right, or to know what they are talking about, before they open their mouth or write their copy?

***

If you like the content on this blog, your generous gift to the author helps to keep it active. I remember all my supporters in my Mass intentions each week.

Answers to Media Fictions

Previous Post

January 20, 2015

More Liberal Denial and Despair Over Pope Francis: Pope Francis Derangement Syndrome Vol. VIII

Next Post

January 23, 2015 In Attack on Pope, Polemical Rogue John Bugay Makes Crude Joke About Multiple Orgasms. (You Read That Right.)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion About Me Answers for Calvinists Answers to Media Fictions Answers to Objections Anti-Catholicism Apologetics Apostolic Succession Atonement Authority of the Church Baptism Benedictines Biblical Exegesis Blogging Book Reviews Books & Writing &c. Calvin's Institutes Capital Punishment Catholic Church Chastity Christology Church Fathers Church Social Doctrine Confession Contraception Conversion Stories Crusades Debates Depression & Suicide Deuterocanon Development of Doctrine Ecumenism English Language Eucharistic Adoration Exorcism Extra Ecclesiam Fisks & Rebuttals Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Fundamentalism Gender Politics Gender Theory Good Works Homosexuality Humor Idolatry Immaculate Conception In the News Inquisition ISIS Islam Just for Fun Just War Justification LCWR Limbo Liturgical Abuse Liturgical Year Magisterium Marriage and Family Mary Mortal Sin New Evangelization NFP Papacy Papal Documents Papal Infallibility Personal Narrative Politics Pope Francis Pope Francis Derangement Syndrome Population Control Praying to the "Dead" Priesthood Primacy of Peter Protestant Denominations Purgatory Radical Islam Radical Traditionalists Real Presence Right to Conscience RIght to Life Saints Same-Sex "Marriage" Seven Quick Takes Social Justice Social Media Sola Scriptura Spirit of Vatican II SSPX The Eucharist The Mass The Resurrection Traditionalism Vatican II Year of Mercy

Select a Month August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 May 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was thrown into a muddy cistern for prophesying Jerusalem's fall?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baruch Micah Isaiah Jeremiah