Leonardo De Chirico Has Fun With Semantics

Last updated on: March 9, 2017 at 5:50 pm by Scott Eric Alt

Leonardo De Chirico Has Fun With Semantics 2017-03-09T17:50:55-04:00 Scott Eric Alt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“There’s not enough room in this dictionary for the two of us, pardner”: Leonardo De Chirico (Image via Pixabay)

In a category of discovery that might be called “found blogs,” I ran across this gem on a site called Reformation 21, courtesy of the ever-helpful assistance of the polemical rogue John Bugay. The title of the article, by Leonardo De Chirico, is “Vatican Files No. 19”; and based on both its contents and the allusion (as I presume) to that bizarre TV show from the 1990s, I am rather afraid that to peer into Vatican Files 1-18 might take me deeper into the realm of science fiction than I want to go.

Mr. Bugay recommends the article in this blog post as a “blunt and honest” masterpiece of exposure. What Mr. De Chirico exposes, according to Mr. Bugay, is the “Roman Catholic shell game” with the meaning of words. The word that both these fine upstanding gentlemen are thinking of is “evangelization.” According to Mr. Bugay, the purpose of said “shell game” is to—what else?—“expand the boundaries of the Roman church.” In Mr. Bugay’s jaded way of seeing reality, Catholicism is not about winning souls for Christ; no, instead it’s about getting fat. Mr. Bugay blames John Paul II for all this madness and trots out the typical anti-Catholic bogeymen.

[S]ome bold Roman Catholics (like the CTC gang) … are “e—” in their efforts, [but] most Roman Catholics just won’t “get it.” Rome simply doesn’t preach “the Gospel,” it preaches “sacraments, Mariology, hierarchy, traditions, papacy, devotions.”

Amazingly, he leaves out Rosaries, vain repetitions, indulgences, Mass cards, saints, liturgies, vestments, trinkets, baubles, and beads. But let that go long enough to take up Mr. De Chirico’s brave exposure of the Catholic abduction of the E-word. (I dare not write the whole thing, lest fire rain down on me.) For the basic gist of Installment No. 19 in the Vatican Files is to wonder how those Catholics, wicked as they are, dare to use such a fine, upstanding, Protestant word! Mr. De Chirico explains his curious sense of exclusivity and entitlement.

There was a time [Note the standard fairy tale beginning here.] in which the [E word] meant something like this: Biblically, it was defined around the evangel (i.e., the Gospel) as it is truly witnessed in Scripture.

[And Mr. De Chirico is, of course, the very man to tell us what the “true witness” of Scripture is.]

Historically it referred to the sixteenth century Protestant Reformation [Hmmm. No known usage of the word before Luther and Calvin?] and the E— Revivals of subsequent centuries. Doctrinally, it has pointed to Christian orthodoxy. …

Well, we can stop here. You see the point. “Orthodoxy,” in Mr. De Chirico’s anachronistic, fairy tale view of Christian history, roughly means “stuff no one dreamed up until Martin Luther.”

But now—and while Mr. Bugay lays the blame for this at the feet of John Paul II, Mr. De Chirico lays it at the feet of George Weigel—the Catholics have come along in an attempt to steal the E word from Protestants. How dare they. Don’t they know that we have our corner of the dictionary and they have theirs? The papists need to stay in their own ghetto, damn it.

The recent book by George Weigel is a clever attempt to re-engineer the word by overlooking its Biblical roots, by severing its historical roots and replacing them with other roots, by changing its doctrinal outlook … and by renegotiating its religious use. … [E— Catholicism embraces not the Gospel but] sacraments, Mariology, hierarchy, traditions, papacy, devotions, etc.

Heavens, when will these horrors end? Those cultic papist Romanists have not only added books to the Bible, but now they’re adding new definitions to the dictionary. You see how they play it? First they add to the word of God, and next they add to words.

Mr. De Chirico attempts to explain what it all amounts to in the end. (And I beg you, gentle reader, if you can understand this, to please clarify it for me, because I am sure I don’t know, although I have tried hard to find out.)

We started with Socrates and we end with Virgil. … The story of the Trojan horse tells us how what seemed to be a victory turned out to be a devastating defeat. [E— Catholicism] may appear as an E—ly friendly project and we may want to welcome it. In actual fact, it is an intellectually courageous attempt to re-define what E— means, maintaining the same spelling but giving it a Roman Catholic meaning. It is a different word altogether.

I suspect he’s trying to draw an analogy between Mr. Weigel’s book and the Trojan Horse, but the point of it is lost to me in the midst of the strange insistence that Protestants have squatters rights to the E word.

This is what passes for thought on the other side of the Tiber River.

***

If you like the content on this blog, your generous gift to the author helps to keep it active. I remember all my supporters in my Mass intentions each week.

Answers for Calvinists

Anti-Catholicism

New Evangelization

Previous Post

April 24, 2013

Why Jason Stellman Has Protestantism Nailed

Next Post

April 25, 2013 In Defense of Bishop Campbell

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion About Me Answers for Calvinists Answers to Media Fictions Answers to Objections Anti-Catholicism Apologetics Apostolic Succession Atonement Authority of the Church Baptism Benedictines Biblical Exegesis Blogging Book Reviews Books & Writing &c. Calvin's Institutes Capital Punishment Catholic Church Chastity Christology Church Fathers Church Social Doctrine Confession Contraception Conversion Stories Crusades Debates Depression & Suicide Deuterocanon Development of Doctrine Ecumenism English Language Eucharistic Adoration Exorcism Extra Ecclesiam Fisks & Rebuttals Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Fundamentalism Gender Politics Gender Theory Good Works Homosexuality Humor Idolatry Immaculate Conception In the News Inquisition ISIS Islam Just for Fun Just War Justification LCWR Limbo Liturgical Abuse Liturgical Year Magisterium Marriage and Family Mary Mortal Sin New Evangelization NFP Papacy Papal Documents Papal Infallibility Personal Narrative Politics Pope Francis Pope Francis Derangement Syndrome Population Control Praying to the "Dead" Priesthood Primacy of Peter Protestant Denominations Purgatory Radical Islam Radical Traditionalists Real Presence Right to Conscience RIght to Life Saints Same-Sex "Marriage" Seven Quick Takes Social Justice Social Media Sola Scriptura Spirit of Vatican II SSPX The Eucharist The Mass The Resurrection Traditionalism Vatican II Year of Mercy

Select a Month August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 May 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Moses Elijah David Jesus