Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

To Give a Defense

John Bugay’s False Understanding of Infallibility

Last updated on: March 11, 2018 at 1:50 pm   by Scott Eric Alt

John Bugay’s False Understanding of Infallibility 2018-03-11T13:50:38-04:00 Scott Eric Alt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Infallibility

Pope Pius IX is infallibly unimpressed with the polemical rogue Mr. John Bugay (public domain)

In a recent post (here), the polemical rogue John Bugay begins with a weird question. “Over at Old Life,” he says, “a commentater [sic] asked: ‘At what point are we free to conclude that a corrupt hierarchy points to a false church?'”

Mr. Bugay finds the question very compelling, but I find it dumb beyond the power of words. (Don’t ever be told that there is no such thing as a dumb question. In fact, the world is infested with them, like gnats or tweets.)

At what point are we free to conclude that a corrupt leadership points to a false country? If Mr. Bugay wants to be consistent (and why would he not?), he should come out in support of a schism of states.

“It is not as if” (he goes on) “the sex abuse scandal is the only corruption the hierarchy is involved in.”

Which church are we talking about again? Remember Matt. 7:4-5.

“The corrupt hierarchy” (he goes on) “goes way back in history. They’ve just traded different corruptions.”

Yes, and so it goes. That business about Total Depravity is a funny thing; it effects all of us. Can we conclude that this points to a false earth?

(This is an aside. I always find it odd, dear reader, that a Calvinist—who believes in the doctrine of Total Depravity—suddenly cries foul when he finds it in a Catholic bishop. Perhaps he thinks that this shows that the Church cannot be infallible. But the dogma does not say that the pope, or any other Catholic, is incapable of sin. Pius IX is never impressed with any of this.)

“This is not to say” (Mr. Bugay concludes with a grand sweep of his hand), “that there are not bad Protestant pastors.” How nice of him to concede so much jello. Catholic leaders are “corrupt”; Protestant pastors are merely “bad.” That’s the game with words he plays.

But the question is rather, “how can such a corrupt hierarchy claim, with a straight face, that a holy God will grant them doctrinal ‘infallibility’ under any circumstances at all, much less the ‘particular’ circumstances that they have narrowly defined?”

Well, if we’ve “narrowly” defined it, why should he hold forth so yawningly on his blog about it? Once again, Mr. Bugay misses the point: The Holy Spirit does not guide the Church into all truth to preserve the purity of men; it does so, rather, to assure our unity in one mind and one judgment (cf. John 17:17-21; 1 Corinthians 1:10).

But doesn’t a careful study of the Bible—even Mr. Bugay’s Bible, which has seven whole books missing—tell us that God has a remarkable proclivity for working through sinners? David committed sexual sin, but God still inspired him to write infallible scripture. Sinners wrote the infallible Bible; sinners preserve the unity of the infallible Church. It is no more difficult than that.

Annie Dillard put it best, in Holy the Firm:

Who shall ascend into the hill of the Lord, or who shall stand in his holy place? There is no one but us. There never has been. There have been generations which remembered and generations which forgot. There has never been a generation of whole men and women who lived well for even one day.

At what point are we free to conclude that a bunch of inane posts points to a false blog?

***

If you like the content on this blog, your generous gift to the author helps to keep it active. I remember all my supporters in my Mass intentions each week.

Answers for Calvinists

Papal Infallibility

Previous Post



February 3, 2013

Sexagesima: An Examination of Conscience

Next Post



February 6, 2013 Rhology Strains at a Gnat


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion About Me Answers for Calvinists Answers to Media Fictions Answers to Objections Anti-Catholicism Apologetics Apostolic Succession Atonement Authority of the Church Baptism Benedictines Biblical Exegesis Blogging Book Reviews Books & Writing &c. Calvin's Institutes Capital Punishment Catholic Church Chastity Christology Church Fathers Church Social Doctrine Confession Contraception Conversion Stories Crusades Debates Depression & Suicide Deuterocanon Development of Doctrine Ecumenism English Language Eucharistic Adoration Exorcism Extra Ecclesiam Fisks & Rebuttals Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Fundamentalism Gender Politics Gender Theory Good Works Homosexuality Humor Idolatry Immaculate Conception In the News Inquisition ISIS Islam Just for Fun Just War Justification LCWR Limbo Liturgical Abuse Liturgical Year Magisterium Marriage and Family Mary Mortal Sin New Evangelization NFP Papacy Papal Documents Papal Infallibility Personal Narrative Politics Pope Francis Pope Francis Derangement Syndrome Population Control Praying to the "Dead" Priesthood Primacy of Peter Protestant Denominations Purgatory Radical Islam Radical Traditionalists Real Presence Right to Conscience RIght to Life Saints Same-Sex "Marriage" Seven Quick Takes Social Justice Social Media Sola Scriptura Spirit of Vatican II SSPX The Eucharist The Mass The Resurrection Traditionalism Vatican II Year of Mercy

Select a Month August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 May 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: God created the world in seven days.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Related posts from To Give a Defense

Catholic

Infallibility is true, but (almost) useless. With some...

To Give a Defense

Catholic

Does the Mass "banish the remembrance of Christ's...

To Give a Defense

Catholic

A Heretic Would Not Cease to Be Pope:...

To Give a Defense

Catholic

About that Syllabus of Errors....Guess What Else Pius...

To Give a Defense

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube