Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

To Give a Defense

Home
Catholic
Good Shepherd No Different Than Fisher More

Good Shepherd No Different Than Fisher More

Last updated on: March 14, 2017 at 12:50 am by Scott Eric Alt

Good Shepherd No Different Than Fisher More 2017-03-14T00:50:37-04:00 Scott Eric Alt

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image via Pixabay

Deacon Sandy Sites

If bishops are going to exercise discipline (rightly) against abuses that occur at the Latin Mass, then they need to exercise equal discipline against those that occur at the Novus Ordo.

Case in point: Good Shepherd Catholic Church in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin. The parish is under the direction of Deacon Sandy Sites. Pat Archbold has been following the story on his blog Creative Minority Report; and you can read his two primary posts here and here.

In case you have not heard about it, Mr. Archbold has all the details, but the gist is this. Deacon Sandy put out a video (watch it on the first of the two posts at CMR) in which he details some of the “unique” aspects one can find at Good Shepherd. The list reads like a very encyclopedia of “Spirit of Vatican II” abuses of the sacred nature of the Mass. They are these.

1. No kneelers. Deacon Sandy justifies their absence under the logic that “we stand for the president.” But sorry: President Obama is not the same as Christ (for which we should all be grateful); and before Christ we kneel. When the president enters the room, we stand because that prepares us to run far away.

2. Open chitchat prior to Mass; a time at which, according to what Sacrosanctum Concilium actually said, there should be the silence of recollection to bring us into the presence of Christ. People can be “in communion with each other” after Mass, once they have first come into communion with Christ. Our communion with Christ is primary.

3. The gross corruption of sacred space with audio visual material to illustrate the homily. This is not a movie theater or a power point presentation; this is the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

4. The presence (as a later video shows) of cartoons on the wall where the Stations of the Cross would normally go. The cartoons depict the parable of the sheep and the goats.

5. A novel addition that Deacon Sandy refers to as a “pre-Mass,” never authorized as a part of the liturgy.

6. Bowing not just to Christ in the Eucharist but also to “the assembly,” under the theory that one is bowing to the Christ that is in them. The difference, which Deacon Sandy does not acknowledge, is that Christ is present body, blood, soul, and divinity in the Eucharist (which is why we bow). Whereas, He is not so present in people (which is why we don’t bow to them). People are not transubstantiated into Christ; nor are they equal to Christ.

7. Asking for extra voluntary prayers (by show of hands and shout-out, I guess) after the normal recitation of the Prayers of the Faithful. Once more, this is a novel and unauthorized addition to the liturgy.

8. Use of bread rather than hosts, on the strange theory that ministers are able to “enter more fully” into the consecration when their hands have actually baked the bread. I’m not sure what theological school supports this notion that a priest enters the consecration more fully when his hands have baked the bread as well as merely confected it. Just turning it into the body and blood of Christ is not enough, it seems.

Deacon Sandy was embarrassed enough by the negative publicity this video got on Creative Minority Report that he asked Mr. Archbold to take it down so that he could enter a time of deeper prayer, reflection, and repentance.

But the deacon is now back from his penance. What good has it done him? Well, in the video to your left, he can be seen using those same audio-visual materials to show the sparse crowd a picture of Pope Benedict XVI. The pope is wearing red shoes and—imagine this!—Deacon Sandy actually mocks the pope emeritus for being more concerned about flair of vestments than charity toward the poor. The “crowd” dutifully laughs at the pope.

It was a shameless display of disrespect to Benedict. But Deacon Sandy’s excuse to Mr. Archbold was that he was entirely innocent and did not know that the man in the red shoes and cassock was the pope. (Who else could it have been? Dorothy? Little Red Riding Hood?) Deacon Sandy says he just did a Google search for “fine vestments” and found that picture with no indication at all of who it could be.

But a friend of mine on Facebook ran that very same Google search and found the same picture used by Deacon Sandy. Take a look at it.

You’ll need to click on the image to enlarge it, but you can clearly see that the picture indicates that the man in question is Pope Benedict. One would not like to accuse a deacon of lying, but lying does very much come to one’s mind.

Keep in mind: Deacon Sandy also told Mr. Archbold that he simply cannot afford kneelers; although, the video says that the kneelers were removed precisely so that one could stand to honor Christ. The two stories are at odds.

If traditionally-minded Catholics have it in their mind that this is what a Novus Ordo parish is like, it is no surprise that they seek refuge in the Extraordinary Form. It is no surprise they have the passion they do. This is the kind of—excuse me for being blunt—crap that bishops need to stamp down, immediately and clearly and with no apology. The bishop should investigate, and discipline Deacon Sandy Sites, and ensure that no more outrages and abuses occur at Good Shepherd. Repairing the liturgy there would be the right first step.

You can reach Deacon Sandy Sites at [email protected], or by calling 1-262-255-2035.

You can also contact the Archbishop:

Most Rev. Jerome E. Listecki

Archbishop of Milwaukee

[email protected].

***

If you like the content on this blog, your generous gift to the author helps to keep it active. I remember all my supporters in my Mass intentions each week.

Liturgical Abuse

Spirit of Vatican II

The Mass

Previous Post

March 6, 2014

Why Latin Mass Onlyists are Destroying the Latin Mass

Next Post

March 14, 2014 A Sovereign Pope Would Do Things My Way & Other Quick Takes: 7QT XVII Seriatim

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Abortion About Me Answers for Calvinists Answers to Media Fictions Answers to Objections Anti-Catholicism Apologetics Apostolic Succession Atonement Authority of the Church Baptism Benedictines Biblical Exegesis Blogging Book Reviews Books & Writing &c. Calvin's Institutes Capital Punishment Catholic Church Chastity Christology Church Fathers Church Social Doctrine Confession Contraception Conversion Stories Crusades Debates Depression & Suicide Deuterocanon Development of Doctrine Ecumenism English Language Eucharistic Adoration Exorcism Extra Ecclesiam Fisks & Rebuttals Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech Fundamentalism Gender Politics Gender Theory Good Works Homosexuality Humor Idolatry Immaculate Conception In the News Inquisition ISIS Islam Just for Fun Just War Justification LCWR Limbo Liturgical Abuse Liturgical Year Magisterium Marriage and Family Mary Mortal Sin New Evangelization NFP Papacy Papal Documents Papal Infallibility Personal Narrative Politics Pope Francis Pope Francis Derangement Syndrome Population Control Praying to the "Dead" Priesthood Primacy of Peter Protestant Denominations Purgatory Radical Islam Radical Traditionalists Real Presence Right to Conscience RIght to Life Saints Same-Sex "Marriage" Seven Quick Takes Social Justice Social Media Sola Scriptura Spirit of Vatican II SSPX The Eucharist The Mass The Resurrection Traditionalism Vatican II Year of Mercy

Select a Month August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 April 2018 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 May 2013 April 2013 February 2013 January 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was known for his great strength and long hair?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter Elijah Samson David