Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Nonreligious
Scientology: If You Don’t Know, Don’t Pretend to Know

Scientology: If You Don’t Know, Don’t Pretend to Know

Last updated on: July 19, 2018 at 11:37 am by ScientologyBeliefs

Scientology: If You Don’t Know, Don’t Pretend to Know 2018-07-19T11:37:23-07:00 ScientologyBeliefs

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Blog by Scientologist Dean Blehert, published on the website of STAND (Scientologists Taking Action Against Discrimination) on biased media coverage of Scientology.

When I hear attacks on people or groups in the media, I notice the attackers provide all the trimmings of “objectivity” when there is no objectivity.

Videos of those attacked show people in awkward positions or with lighting that makes them look odd and sinister.

Person on the street being interviewed

Photo by 1000 Words/Shutterstock.com

The “experts” interviewed are given softball questions, leading questions, etc. They are never challenged. They usually include “experts” whose authority comes from the fact that they were once members of the group or friends of the person now in question. Such people are never challenged. No one asks the obvious questions: “Hey, bud, you were a member of that group and went along with it for years? If it’s as bad as you say, how come you were so stupid, and if you were so stupid then, why should we listen to you now?”

And they don’t ask: “Why should we accept as truth what a man who has left and betrayed a group he once claimed to love has to say now?”

Members of the attacked group or supporters of the attacked person get no softball questions, get interrupted every 30 seconds and challenged—or we are shown only a 20-second denial by a spokesperson who probably spoke for several minutes.

There are many other ways the media undermine objectivity.

Here’s my perspective on this as a Scientologist:

There are millions of us. I personally know several thousand Scientologists and know OF thousands more. I also know many people who have been Scientologists, but are not now active in it, yet do not attack it and say they value what they got out of it. But when a TV station does a show on Scientology, it will introduce the same handful of critics, a kind of road-show of selected “ex-Scientologists” every time. The implication is that the statements of these few people are more valid than would be the statements of millions of people active in Scientology and being helped by it.

If it were Christianity under attack, the media (by analogy) would introduce Judas as an ex-Christian who’d been very close to “their founder,” one of His apostles, and Judas would tell us how bad it all was. “And did Christ treat you badly?” “Did he set you up to betray Him?” etc. Judas would weep and tell his story for 30 minutes. Then in a 30-second blip from a longer interview, a very serious-and-official-looking St. James or St. Peter or the like would be shown giving a brief denial (but no sobbing, no tragic appearance). The announcers would talk at length about people being hypnotized to believe water is wine or that dead men can be brought to life. They would not bring on people helped by Christ. They would not show Christ giving his Sermon on the Mount (that would be too common-sensical).

One assumption implicit in such presentations is that the group is bad, and therefore those who’ve left the group must be good, so they can be believed. This is circular: We know the group is bad. How do we know? Because these good people tell us so. How do we know they are good people? Because they left the group, which was bad. Logical? No.

Another assumption is: these people are reliable witnesses, objective, because they are no longer in the group. The current members of the group cannot be believed, because they are brainwashed “believers.” They can’t be objective about the group because they are still in it. That’s the odd notion that makes Judas the “objective” judge of Christianity.

In fact, in many cases the attackers are NOT “good people”: they were kicked out of the group for reasons not brought up—financial irregularities, sexual misbehavior, physically attacking others, etc. Usually what they accuse others of having done turns out to be what THEY did. But this is something much documented online for any who choose to look.

Anyone who has ever read a good history book will know that the person who leaves a group—and especially one who has been thrown out of the group or asked to leave or demoted for malfeasance—is FAR from objective, is bitter, needs to make the group wrong in order to make him or herself right. If a group kicks me out, I’m not going to say nice things about it because to do so is to admit my own failures and crimes.

Yes, a group member may be prejudiced in its favor, likely to see the best of it, but nowhere near as prejudiced as the person who, having pledged support for the group, leaves it and attacks it. Objectivity would be giving those IN the group at least as good a chance to speak out as the group’s enemies. Objectivity depends on presenting both sides.

I once participated in a protest march—back in the early ’90s in Berlin. At that time, the German government was passing discriminatory laws and publishing lies about our church. All this has since been handled, and Scientology is flourishing in Germany, but at that time we were under attack. There were about 12,000 of us in the march (we counted). We came from the United States and many other nations. I saw 800 Hungarian Scientologists getting off a long line of buses. Eight hundred from that nation alone! We filled up many long blocks of city street. At one point of the march, on a small island in the street, there were seven protesters against our march. That’s right—I counted seven of them. They held up signs attacking Scientology. So there were 12,000 of us, seven protesters attacking us.

The next few days I saw articles about the march in a couple of German newspapers, The Washington Post, The New York Times, USA Today. All but one of the papers said there were about 100 marchers. USA Today doubled that—200 marchers. In some newspapers they gave EQUAL SPACE TO THE SEVEN ANTI-MARCH PROTESTERS. One German newspaper gave more coverage to these guys, interviewed them and wrote of their holding a meeting after the march. The article was vague about how many of them there were. It just gave them as an “objective source” for what they wanted to say about us.

I have never since that march had any doubts about the corruption of our mainstream media. One hundred people looks nothing like 12,000 people. Did you ever watch a parade of 12,000 people down a city street? How long did it take for the entire parade to pass by?

We eventually won that particular battle—and many others. But we didn’t win it by waiting for newspapers to say nice things about us.

I hope, when you watch the news, ANY news, you are aware of the gimmicks that mislead, the feigned objectivity of “friendly” or “authoritative” voices, the one-sided documentation and all the possibilities that crucial information has been distorted or omitted.

I won’t argue that Scientology is for everyone or even that you should take a Scientology course and see for yourself. I ask only that if you do NOT do that, you recognize that you have NOT inspected for yourself, but have received only the jaundiced opinions of people who are not necessarily truthful.

In other words, if you don’t really know, then don’t pretend to know.

fake news

STAND

biased media coverage of Scientology

Previous Post

July 19, 2018

How I Answer Questions About Scientology: “Do the Math.”

Next Post

July 19, 2018 Harlem Applauds Young Activists at the Finale of the Human Rights Summit

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category anti-Scientology hate Church of Scientology Citizens Commission on Human Rights Community activities conflict Coronavirus critics David Miscavige Dianetics Discrimination Documentary Showcase Drug Prevention fake news families Florida Foundation for a Drug-Free World Freewinds religious retreat holidays Hollywood Village homeschooling kids during the coronavirus lockdown How I Became a Scientologist human rights I Am a Scientologist Ideal Scientology Organizations Interfaith L. Ron Hubbard media Meet a Scientologist Neighborhood Cleanups Psychiatry Religion Religious Freedom Religious Studies Scientologist Scientologists Scientology Scientology Beliefs Scientology cathedral Scientology celebration Scientology Humanitarian Campaigns Scientology Media Productions Scientology Mission Scientology Network Scientology Parent Scientology TV Scientology Volunteer Ministers STAND Stay Well The Way to Happiness tolerance Truth About Scientology Uncategorized Voices for Humanity What is Scientology? What Scientology is all a out Youth for Human Rights

Select a Month March 2025 October 2024 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 September 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 January 2019 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 February 2016 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 October 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 December 2013 August 2013 December 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the currency for the temple tax?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Talent Denarius Mina Shekel