Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Nonreligious
Scientologist Finds Holes in a Recent Religious “Study”

Scientologist Finds Holes in a Recent Religious “Study”

Last updated on: January 17, 2018 at 9:52 pm by ScientologyBeliefs

Scientologist Finds Holes in a Recent Religious “Study” 2018-01-17T21:52:40-08:00 ScientologyBeliefs

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Scientologist Rodger Clark takes on Academia in his review of a recent religious study (and its news coverage). Published courtesy of STAND, Scientologists Taking Action Against Discrimination.

It must have been another slow news day in Britain because Will Kirby of the Express decided to do a story on a “landmark study” by Coventry and Oxford Universities. Through observation of Christian pilgrims in Spain, they concluded that religious people are not “born believers.” That, instead, “it is now thought that factors including upbringing and socio-cultural processes are more likely to influence whether a person is a religious believer,” and “religious belief is most likely rooted in culture rather than in some primitive gut intuition.”

Buddhist monk in meditation: by Sunti/Shutterstock

No kidding? You mean to tell me that Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Marxist, Republican and Democrat parents tend to produce kids with beliefs similar to their own?! I didn’t see that one coming…

Seeing “landmark study” in a news article is like seeing “it’s a triumph!” by a movie critic, then finding the movie went straight to HBO (meaning “dud”). It’s hardly a “landmark” study when terms as vague as “more likely” are used to describe its conclusion.

I’m sure the researchers themselves are intelligent and dedicated people, so instead of just relying on some reporter’s information, I went to the original article, “Supernatural Belief Is Not Modulated by Intuitive Thinking Style or Cognitive Inhibition.” I have to hand it to the researchers. They really did work their collective butts off gathering the data to prove something that is a big, fat “duh” for the average person. Why they figured it needed proving is a mystery but, hey, we all gotta make a living. Anyway, the reporter notes that “lead author Miguel Farias asked: ‘What drives our belief in gods—intuition or reason; heart or head?”

Hold on a minute Miguel… Why did you limit “religion” to “gods” and the “supernatural” and why did you make the assumption that belief could only come from reason or intuition, and not include things like direct perception and direct experience? And, if you’re going to take exact measurements of things like god(s), belief, logic, intuition, the supernatural etc. don’t you think those things should be clearly and exactly defined and classified? For all we know, “God” could mean anything from Jehovah to an Oxford professor to Kim Kardashian (they all have worshipers).

Father teaches son to read the Quran: by Aisylu Ahmadieva/Shutterstock

The researchers also assumed—meaning they “believed”—that “rational thinking,” intuition and belief were all separate mental processes when those could just as easily be phases of the same process. Since the research rests upon those concepts, it wouldn’t have hurt to clearly establish them first.

The study supposedly disproved a popular notion in academia that belief in “the supernatural” was natural and intuitive, meaning people are “born believers.” It actually didn’t disprove it at all! In exploring the root of belief in “the supernatural” it completely missed the obvious: that however it’s rooted, “belief” itself is inescapable. People are nothing but “born believers.”

If you look at both hypotheses, they each confirm that people prefer to believe something rather than believe nothing. That people always choose any explanation over no explanation, better explanations over worse explanations. The whole religion vs. science debate is only an argument over the quality of explanations of what to “believe in.” Even “rational thinking” itself requires that someone, first, believe the data they are reasoning with.

The point of this is that belief, whether rational or irrational, is intrinsic and inescapable in humans. You won’t find anyone whose pupils contract that doesn’t believe something. From the time we are born, we “believe” everything we sense, and we compute with it. Whether the scientific method, family and cultural values, “intuition,” or direct experience is involved, it all leads to one belief (meaning “assumed truth”) or another. The one thing common to both science and religion (and everything in between) is belief. The moment one accepts a datum as true—be it hypothesis or dogma—one is engaged in belief. Is it even important whether those experiences spring from rational thought or intuition or both or something else?

By oatawa/Shutterstock

It always baffles me that people who have the intelligence and drive to achieve the positions these researchers have can so completely and continually miss the point when attempting to analyze “religious belief.” It makes me want to grab their pointy heads and give them a giant noogie to wake them up.

The entire point of the religious practice is religious experience. The experience of a better, happier, more stable state of being, both personally and socially. As with any other experience, it is both subjective and objective. Although the personal experience is subjective, the effects of the experience have been proven to be as objectively measurable as any other effect—physiologically, mentally, socially and even culturally.

The religious experience is as measurably “real” in its effect as the experience of music, art, love, companionship, fellowship, friendship, and every other higher or happier state mankind seeks.

And, no matter its origin, the pursuit of religious experience is every bit as valid, as desirable and as enduring.

Previous Post

January 10, 2018

What I Tell My Friends When Scientology Is Libeled

Next Post

January 24, 2018 My Daughter and My Whole Purpose as a Scientology Parent

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category anti-Scientology hate Church of Scientology Citizens Commission on Human Rights Community activities conflict Coronavirus critics David Miscavige Dianetics Discrimination Documentary Showcase Drug Prevention fake news families Florida Foundation for a Drug-Free World Freewinds religious retreat holidays Hollywood Village homeschooling kids during the coronavirus lockdown How I Became a Scientologist human rights I Am a Scientologist Ideal Scientology Organizations Interfaith L. Ron Hubbard media Meet a Scientologist Neighborhood Cleanups Psychiatry Religion Religious Freedom Religious Studies Scientologist Scientologists Scientology Scientology Beliefs Scientology cathedral Scientology celebration Scientology Humanitarian Campaigns Scientology Media Productions Scientology Mission Scientology Network Scientology Parent Scientology TV Scientology Volunteer Ministers STAND Stay Well The Way to Happiness tolerance Truth About Scientology Uncategorized Voices for Humanity What is Scientology? What Scientology is all a out Youth for Human Rights

Select a Month March 2025 October 2024 July 2024 May 2024 April 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 September 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 November 2021 September 2021 August 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 August 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 January 2019 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 February 2016 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 October 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 December 2013 August 2013 December 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How was the land divided among the tribes of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

By casting lots By age By family wealth By strength in battle