Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Science On Religion

America’s public ritual gone terribly wrong

Last updated on: February 2, 2015 at 1:57 pm   by Connor Wood

America’s public ritual gone terribly wrong 2015-02-02T13:57:18-05:00 Connor Wood

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Connor Wood

Dark days for football

Last year around this time I wrote a piece, “Holden Caulfield and the Super Bowl,” in which I shook my finger at the smarmy geek-culture “Sportsball” meme. Sportsball, a word that conveys how very, very little speaker the proud speaker knows about sports, is a fine example of the conspicuous disdain of sports generally among certain educated types – those whose sense of personal identity derives solely from their being educated. For the rest of us, who have other, less desperately insecure sources of identity,* sports can be a welcome exercise in imagination and play. However, there’s truth to be found in more curmudgeonly descriptions of the Super Bowl as a “late-capitalist orgy of excess and jingoism.” Last night’s Super Bowl exhibited some of the worst aspects of ritual gone wrong.

I mean, I enjoyed the game. Living in Boston, I suppose I’m a Patriots fan, although my true allegiances are with the middle-of-the-country Packers and Broncos. Unlike many Super Bowls, this was a stellar matchup, with a nail-biting ending and gutsy plays and comebacks. Wonderful, right? I enjoy a good drama, and this game certainly was that.

But this was also a lot more. The Super Bowl is, and has been for decades, a “convergence of sports, politics, and myth,” according to religion scholar Joseph L. Price. As Price recently explained to The Week:

Like festivals in ancient societies, which made no distinctions regarding the religious, political, and sporting character of certain events, the Super Bowl succeeds in reuniting these now disparate dimensions of social life.

Nowhere was this pagan blending of ritual, sport, and state on better display last night than the halftime show featuring Lady Gaga, or possibly Katy Perry. Riding on a giant walking tiger float whose massive legs were moved by hidden lackeys, Perry entered the stadium like a veritable goddess. I don’t mean that in a good way. This sort of otherworldly spectacle has been used since time immemorial to conjure powerful emotions and sentiments, to stir up a profound sense of the numinous among participants. Masks and costumes are ubiquitous in initiation rites, religious festivals, and rituals. Across societies, gods and spirits become real when they are enacted, when the sacred play of ritual gives them a stage. But rarely has ritual theater served such vapid ends.

Around the world, theater’s roots are in religion. As the ritual studies scholar Ronald Grimes reminds us, in ancient Greece the plays of Sophocles weren’t just entertainment – they provided a sacred fulcrum for the community, a place where one’s identity as an Athenian was renewed and the deepest moral issues of life were wrestled with in a regulated, collective arena. The mystery cults that thrived during the height of the Greek classical era, which may have influenced early Christian communities, almost certainly centered on theatrical ritual elements.

Now, take all those basic tools of mystery and ritual – spectacle, performance, archetypal imagery, music and rhythm – and completely void them of all meaningful emotional or existential content. Strip away their ability – no, their interest – in grappling with life’s essential questions. Instead, inflate them with a ghastly market ethos, in which literally nothing is sacred and the only meaning is to sell. Magnify by the size of an entire continent. Voilà. You’ve got the Super Bowl.

Together with the commercials, which largely opted for the weepy emotional angle this year, you’re left with a gargantuan public spectacle that has all of the mechanics and trappings of sacred ritual but none of the value or meaning. The commercials’ manipulative invocations of sacred values, like fatherhood and family responsibility, occasionally offered the cynical hope that there could be a moral core to the whole spectacle – but in the last few seconds of each ad spot they tried to sell us cars or insurance or whatever, and we were jolted back into reality. This was an utterly mercenary affair.

A great deal of social life is about signaling who we are, or who we hope to become. Our tastes let us display to everyone which groups we belong to – or want to be seen as belonging to. Accordingly, many of my friends who dislike football aren’t just geeky anti-sports misanthropes. They’re motivated by a thinking person’s disdain for the vapid role football plays in American public culture – the beer commercials, the broisms, the peculiar mixing of rigid American patriotism and militarism with sacred symbols and sporting motifs. These friends dislike football in order to distance themselves from that world of plastic patriotism, that brittle national identity centered on Buying Things and ultimately sourced in a desperate, repressed fear of death.

I agree with them. This is not an identity worth signing on to.

But in secular American society, the only experts in the tools of ritual and spectacle are the marketers. The only time we ever see ritualized spectacle, of the kind that forges a lasting collective identity and hauls the eternal human drama back onto the stage, is when some advertiser is actively preying on us. Thus, in the minds of many thinking persons, ritual and civil religion have become permanently identified with manipulative commercialism, are tainted with that odd brand of mass-market kitsch which Americans have somehow accepted as their collective emotional totem.

This is not good. By convincing the educated and thoughtful that ritual is the tool of banal evil, that all of civil religion is summed up in a beer commercial, the advertisers have cornered the market on the ancient art of public religious theater. They have no competitors on the mass stage. The sensitive and intelligent are now unwilling to even touch public ritual with a ten-foot pole. Everyone else probably has a deep-down sense that something is not okay, that our grinning marketing culture is trying to distract us from something important. But then the next SUV commercial appears and everybody is distracted once again.

Again, I like sports. They exemplify the central role of play in human culture, the crucial importance of arbitrary rules and ritual. We’re ritual animals. As children, we’re probably even hard-wired to learn rituals – to observe and replicate sequences of behavior that are not apparently practical, such as kneeling to receive communion or shaving each morning. We bond most easily to one another when we step into shared imaginative worlds, where we agree on invented rules, where ritual takes over from physics as the primary arbiter of reality.

Football is such a world. There’s no physical difference between the end zone and the one-yard line. They’re objectively identical patches of turf. It’s the rules of the game that make them different. The game works because everyone on the field agrees that there’s a very important difference between that one-yard line and the end zone just beyond it.

Agreements like this – rules that govern imaginative play – are what make social life possible. When do we really bond with our friends? When we play sports or board games, watch movies, recite ghost stories. This is why extremely literal-minded people, such as those on the autism spectrum, often have social difficulties. Imaginative playrooms, where literal truths are subordinate to imaginative exercises, are where we forge our truest bonds.

And so the real tragedy of American public culture’s abuse of imagination is that highly educated critics, such as my fellow religion blogger Cris Campbell, feel pushed toward literalism as the only ethically valid response. Play and ritual must be dangerous, “beholden to fantasy and scripts,” because they produce such monstrosities as the Super Bowl. Therefore we must shun them in the service of the rational greater good.

This is, of course, baloney. Human culture doesn’t work without imagination governed by fanciful conventions. But the saccharine corruption of American public ritual is making us forget that.

Which suits the bad guys just fine. Remember the movie The Usual Suspects? In one scene, Kevin Spacey’s character intones that “the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled wasn’t convincing the world that he didn’t exist.” It’s a memorable quote. But it’s wrong. The Devil’s greatest trick is being pulled off right now – in the form of a 21st-century market culture where the only public rites are vacuous capitalist orgies. It convinces the educated that all sacred spectacle is the Devil’s property, and should be soundly rejected by all reputable persons. The trouble is, with the educated and the sensitive now sneering at the entire concept of ritual and sacred play, the Devil gets the playing field to all to himself.

____

Public service announcement:  See last Friday’s excellent XKCD for a heartening expression of why you shouldn’t act superior about not liking sports. Using the “Sportsball” meme to show off how intellectual you are is still annoying, even though our public rituals ARE royally messed up.

____

* Or who are Buddhists and therefore, conveniently, have no ultimate personal identity

Editorial

Modern culture and religion

commercials

football

imagination

marketers

play

public culture

ritual

sports

sportsball

Super Bowl

Usual Suspects

Previous Post



January 24, 2015

Does Eben Alexander "prove heaven?" Sort of.

Next Post



February 18, 2015 Is willpower really a finite resource?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Cognitive Science of Religion Costly investment theory Cultural psychology Editorial Evolution Evolution of Religion Evolution of religion series Evolutionary psychology Ideology and religion Modeling Religion Project Modern culture and religion Most Popular Practice of science Religion and education Religion and ethics Religion and health Religion and perception Religion and prejudice Religious violence Religious ways of thinking Science and religion Scientific study of religion Secularization Spirituality Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2022 February 2022 December 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many stones did David take to fight Goliath?

Select your answer to see how you score.

7 4 5 3

Related posts from Science On Religion

Public Square

Why Rites of Passage Are Painful

Science On Religion

Public Square

So Long, Pax Americana

Science On Religion

Public Square

The Natural History of Music

Science On Religion

Public Square

More Signal, Less Noise

Science On Religion

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Religion News

What Is Catholic Integralism?

Catholic Integralists believe that religious values – specifically Christian ones – should...

Electing A Virtuous President Would Make Immunity Irrelevant

Presidential immunity can bring with it many risks. So how can we...

Why The Olympic Games Are A ‘Civil Religious’...

Sporting events form a vital space where Americans display their 'civil religious...

Farewell For Now

After more than a decade of news, research updates, and insights on...

Q: Why do Southern Baptists and like-minded Protestants...

THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Why? Simple. Because they believe that’s what the...

Is Gambling Evil?

THE QUESTION: Is gambling evil? THE RELIGION GUY’S ANSWER: Analysts anticipate a...

view all Religion News blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube