Journal articles on scientific study of religion available online this month

Last updated on: February 20, 2013 at 10:14 pm by Connor Wood

Journal articles on scientific study of religion available online this month 2013-02-20T22:14:32-05:00 Connor Wood

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Connor Wood

In 2011, Wesley Wildman, contributor to Science On Religion here at Patheos.com, made an agreement with Taylor & Francis to start publishing a new academic journal, Religion, Brain & Behavior. The journal’s mission was to provide a centralized venue for the most insightful, methodologically sophisticated, and academically valuable research in the field of the scientific study of religion – a field that’s seen rapid, even explosive, growth in recent years. Since then, Religion, Brain & Behavior has became, in scholar Michael Blume’s words, “THE cutting-edge journal for evolutionary studies of religion.” So we decided to post about the fact that Taylor & Francis is making articles from Religion, Brain & Behavior free for online access and download through the month of February.

In the 1980s, only a handful of articles on the evolutionary and biological study of religion – that is, the study of the role and origins of religion in human evolution – appeared worldwide each year. Now, more than 200 appear each year, in venues that range from social psychology and religious studies journals to journals on game theory and evolutionary science. While the multidisciplinary nature of this new, evolutionary science of religion is a major strength – it means that experts with a wide variety of backgrounds are, essentially, crowd-sourcing one of the most fascinating questions in history – it can also be a hindrance, because those experts aren’t necessarily reading one another’s work or keeping up with advancements elsewhere in the field. It’s simply too much work to hunt down every article and book published each year. But a central venue for presenting research findings, hosting methodological debates, and advancing new theories and models would give this multidisciplinary project more focus, allowing researchers from all corners of academia to maintain tabs on the big news in the evolutionary study of religion.

Recognition of this need was what drove the creation of Religion, Brain & Behavior (RBB). Two years later, the journal seems to be doing what its creators, including contributors to this blog, hoped it would do – it’s become the flagship venue for publication in the field, drawing submissions from leaders in a wide variety of scientific disciplines. But RBB isn’t just a neutral forum, or a sounding board for researchers from across the world. The journal has its own agenda: to help facilitate a productive – and much-needed – melding of views from the cognitive, biological, evolutionary, and behavioral sciences on one hand and, on the other, powerful insights from the established field of religious studies.

This is important because traditionally, religious studies has been categorized as a humanities discipline, and its practitioners have been less interested in explaining religious phenomena than in cataloguing and interpreting them in their cultural, literary, or philosophical contexts. In fact, leading lights in the field of religious studies are often downright suspicious of attempts to explain religion scientifically or to advance evolutionary models for religious practices and beliefs. Similarly, researchers in the cognitive and evolutionary sciences have often shown little interest in, or knowledge of, the remarkably sophisticated perspectives developed within religious studies. Despite their mutual indifference, however, some researchers believe that the two fields of inquiry could benefit tremendously from exchanging findings and insights, which, we hope, is where RBB comes in. As the journal’s founders, Patrick McNamara, Richard Sosis, and Wesley Wildman, put it:

When experts in the scientific study of religion operate with a lamentable lack of basic knowledge about religious studies, they should be corrected. When scholars in religious studies operate as if relevant scientific knowledge about religion does not exist, they should be challenged.

RBB‘s editorial advisory board effectively demonstrates this commitment to interdisciplinary cross-fertilization not only between the sciences, but across the yawning sciences-humanities divide. Figures from fields as diverse as sociology, philosophy, anthropology, and evolutionary biology have committed their support to growing the journal’s presence and advancing its mission. Theology, religious studies, social psychology, neuroscience, and medical science are also amply represented. These fields aren’t listed to show off – they’re to show that RBB is genuinely trying to be a new type of publication that incorporates serious insights from both the sciences and humanities.

Although it is and will remain decidedly a scientific journal, RBB‘s emphasis on biological research informed by multidisciplinary perspectives – and that passes muster against the standards and expectations of academic religious studies – means that the scientific study of religion is potentially poised to advance in exciting new directions in coming years. We don’t want to come across like we’re using this blog space to advertising something, but then again we kind of are doing just that. However, we think you’ll actually get something out of it. If you’re an interested layperson who wants to learn more, a researcher yourself, or even a skeptical outsider, Taylor & Francis’s website for RBB might be worth checking out in the next week.

Editorial

Scientific study of religion

Previous Post

February 12, 2013

Religious households more likely to save money, plan for the future

Next Post

February 22, 2013 Rise in elder Korean suicides: A reminder that religion matters

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Cognitive Science of Religion Costly investment theory Cultural psychology Editorial Evolution Evolution of Religion Evolution of religion series Evolutionary psychology Ideology and religion Modeling Religion Project Modern culture and religion Most Popular Practice of science Religion and education Religion and ethics Religion and health Religion and perception Religion and prejudice Religious violence Religious ways of thinking Science and religion Scientific study of religion Secularization Spirituality Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2022 February 2022 December 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I became queen through a beauty contest, hiding my Jewish identity at my cousin's advice. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sarah Ruth Vashti Esther