Richard Dawkins to debate the Archbishop of Canterbury

Last updated on: April 30, 2012 at 6:11 pm by Connor Wood

Richard Dawkins to debate the Archbishop of Canterbury 2012-04-30T18:11:01-04:00 Connor Wood

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Joel Daniels

Sophia_Europa

Oxford University has announced that it will host a debate between famed science writer and atheist Richard Dawkins and Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury. The event on February 23rd, which will be webcast live here, is sponsored by the Oxford theology faculty. The theme of the debate is “The nature of human beings and the question of their ultimate origin,” and it will be moderated by Anthony Kenny, a philosopher at the university.

As Dawkins is Britain’s most famous living atheist, and Williams is Britain’s most famous living Christian, the two have crossed paths publicly before. They met in 2005 on Dawkins’ radio show, and on a BBC Channel 4 forum in 2010 titled “The Enemies of Reason”. In addition, they have spoken of each other occasionally over the years. Williams, for example, has praised Dawkins’ writing about the process of evolution for its clarity and beauty, while also criticizing Dawkins’ theory of “memes” as “philosophically crass, undeveloped at best, simply contradictory and empty at worst.” For his part, Dawkins seems somewhat mystified by Williams, recognizing him as a first-rate intellect with an inexplicable belief in the mythological. Dawkins suggests that Williams’ artistic temperament may be to blame, saying that perhaps he doesn’t “understand the difference between literal truth and poetry, or literal truth and metaphor.”

It is difficult to predict what the tone of the debate will be. Religious constituencies often complain that Dawkins’ constructs a “straw God” that is easy to dismiss, while Dawkins counters with a charge of evasiveness on the part of his interlocutors. He complains that they construct a divine figure, amenable to science, in which no practicing religious person actually believes. Dawkins refers to this as religious believers trying to “have their cake and eat it, too.”

Dawkins has been less visible since his retirement from Oxford in 2008, and the vitriol between the “New Atheists” and religious apologists seems to have cooled off. When Oxford filled Dawkins’ previous post as Professor for the Public Understanding of Science with the mathematician Marcus du Sautoy, the appointment represented a change in the function of the position; du Sautoy has indicated that he will concentrate on the “wonder of science,” and less so on religion. (As a mathematician, he may feel the sting of religious groups less strongly than Dawkins did; few religious believers argue against the existence of prime numbers, du Sautoy’s specialty.) Whether this change in the cultural landscape will translate into a more high-minded debate remains to be seen.

Sophia Europa, the sponsor of the debate, was founded by the Theology faculty of Oxford in 2005 to support interdisciplinary study in science, the humanities, and theology. Its directors are Margaret Yee, a philosopher who works in epistemology and consciousness, and John Hedley Brooke, a prominent historian of religion and science. As Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams is the head of the Church of England and spiritual leader of the worldwide Anglican Communion, as well as being a theologian of some renown. Richard Dawkins was Oxford University’s Professor for Public Understanding of Science from 1995-2008, and author of many popular books on Darwinian evolutionary biology and atheism; a number of publications have recognized him as one of the most influential people in the world. Both received the D. Phil. from Oxford University.

Uncategorized

Archbishop of Canterbury

Previous Post

February 16, 2012

Religious and mystical experiences common among Americans

Next Post

February 17, 2012 Religious beliefs affect neural self-processing

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Cognitive Science of Religion Costly investment theory Cultural psychology Editorial Evolution Evolution of Religion Evolution of religion series Evolutionary psychology Ideology and religion Modeling Religion Project Modern culture and religion Most Popular Practice of science Religion and education Religion and ethics Religion and health Religion and perception Religion and prejudice Religious violence Religious ways of thinking Science and religion Scientific study of religion Secularization Spirituality Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2022 February 2022 December 2021 October 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: The book of Lamentations contains seven chapters.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE