Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Religious Music & Entertainment
The Future of Media 4: Television

The Future of Media 4: Television

Last updated on: February 7, 2025 at 8:00 am by Coyle Neal

0 Comments

The Future of Media 4: Television 2025-01-26T14:25:14-07:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This series thinking about the future of media is wide ranging, as evidenced by the fact that I want to spend one post talking about the archaic technology of television. And I say “archaic” only partly ironically, in that TV obviously still exists. But the reality is that most of us aren’t watching it live, and we’re certainly not setting any schedules around it the way we used to. Aside from a handful of special events like the Superbowl (and even that is down on live TV and up on streaming services), TV viewership is the equivalent of a post-war city on the front lines: a hollowed-out shell that was once magnificent but is now eking by without even the barest of essentials.

First, we should recognize that this is a sad state of affairs. Live TV is a good thing at least to this extent: for a relatively minor one-time expense, even the poorest of the poor can have access to entertainment that at least has the potential to be worthwhile (whether said potential is now or ever has been recognized is a different question). No subscriptions, no additional internet costs, no hidden fees, no anything. Just buy the box and enjoy what you’re given.

Second, TV has already begun the process of adapting to this new reality. This process in fact began over twenty years ago with the creation of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? And Whose Line is it Anyway? Two shows with incredibly small overhead costs, no needed writing, and reliance on one or two big-to-moderate names to drum up viewership. If viewership was small, no skin off the network’s nose. That these two shoes had large viewership was frosting on the cake. When the early 2000s rolled around, adapting cable “reality TV” shows was a small step to take in the wake of Millionaire and Whose Line? Again, small overhead meant a small viewership could still turn a profit.

And that’s where TV (yes, even cable) has been stuck ever since. The networks can get a minimum number of people to watch, so as long as they keep their costs low profits are still achievable. Whether that’s sustainable in the long run is somewhat less clear. The inflexibility of broadcast TV is simply never going to appeal to anyone who is a millennial or younger (heaven help you if you don’t adapt yourself to my schedule!), which means those audiences are going to start to diminish.

So where will TV go from here? A couple of predictions:

First, foreign language TV is certainly going to take off, if it hasn’t already. For example, Telemundo reaches 95% of Spanish-language households in the US. Don’t be surprised if in the very near future the big four networks come out with a handful of Spanish-language shows for Primetime.

Second, expect to see a sharp upward turn in the quality of writing and acting, and a sharp downturn in the recognizability of the actors on TV. I mean by this three things:

Because of its small audience, the networks will be less and less able to afford big-name talent to draw viewers. Therefore
They will need to step up the quality of their writing (and let’s be honest, nobody in American visual pop culture has covered themselves in glory in terms of writing ability in the past decade or so);
They will need to step up the quality of their acting, but again
They can’t afford big names, so the search for high-quality/low-cost nobodies will be on.

Finally, expect to see more genre-specific TV. Because the audiences are going to be small anyway, why not target the genres that have built-in fan bases? Horror, sci-fi, fantasy, detective fiction, etc. When combined with better writers and better actors, the constraints of a small budget will give us better materials than we’ve had for a while.

Hopefully this means that TV will be getting better in the short run, and as a result get healthier in the long run.

Dr. Coyle Neal is co-host of the City of Man Podcast an Amazon Associate (which is linked in this blog), and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, MO

Films

TV Show

future of media

Previous Post

January 31, 2025

The Future of Media 3: Repurposing Theaters

Next Post

February 14, 2025 The Future of Media 5: Genre-Specific Fiction

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"No disagreement with any of that--though I've not heard "Moments" and will have to look ..."

cneal

Top of the Country: Amen

"The song is quite bouncy, even upbeat, considering the subject matter. (His "pills" ran out ..."

TheOldMaid

Top of the Country: Amen

"One noteworthy series in this area is valuable lessons in law. This series helps young ..."

Thomas White

The Law

"The longevity of Parker's lectures and teachings after his death is no more surprising than ..."

reggiebannister

Proclaiming Christ Still

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who saw the "writing on the wall"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nebuchadnezzar Amos Belshazzar Darius