Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
General Christian
Religious Music & Entertainment
Common Grace, 3.25

Common Grace, 3.25

Last updated on: January 3, 2023 at 8:00 am by Coyle Neal

0 Comments

Common Grace, 3.25 2022-12-28T08:23:06-07:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post is part of a series walking through the third volume of Abraham Kuyper’s Common Grace

There are three areas in which government must know God’s will:

The role of government itself;
The relationships in society;
“the basic distinction between good and evil.” (203)

This tells us that there is no “neutral state” possible. More specifically on this topic later, but generally this matters because Kuyper himself has been called the standard bearer of the neutral state.

That’s not to say there is no neutrality anywhere in the state:

“neutrality has to do with the diversity of churches and various forms of worship, it has to do with religious belief, and it has to do with matters of morality, justice, and decency.” (204)

Even questions like whether government should exempt conscientious objectors from the draft or whether it should punish attempted suicides both have to do with neutrality. This question has gotten more difficult given our fractured state. Once we were united religiously, and when that ceased at least we were still united morally. We thought that the moral unity would be good enough, but now we have lost even that. All this shows us that there’s really no such thing as ‘neutrality’ in a state. Even if a state supports no specific church, it still must take a moral position on specific issues. Having justice requires a penal code, which in turn requires a sense of good and evil. Even the murderer: does he deserve punishment as a villain? Or is he sick in need of a cure? This is a moral question–we can’t even outsource this to doctors, since they’re not the government.

What about freedom? Should it be “military”? As in, a compulsion used to shape a uniform society? Or should it be “domestic”? As in, raising a properly-shaped generation? We don’t want to go too far either way here, and need to account for the people’s character. But the approach we use and the way we balance these questions affects legislation.

This same contrast between “accountability and freedom” applies when we get more specific, say, with marriage. Are men and women fundamentally without distinction? If so, marriage collapses and the state must raise children. If not, marriage is upheld and parents must raise children. State “neutrality” defaults to the former, neopagan, view. In this case “free love” wins and marriage becomes a mere “private pastime.” (207) A “choice must be made and is always made,” and government should make it with open eyes. (207-208)

The same applies to property. Historically it has belonged to the individual. Today, people have begun to claim that property belongs to all humanity. Government must take a side, or else it’s aiding and abetting theft (whichever side is the accurate side). What’s more, the government must be clear about the consequences of its policy. Private property tends to disproportionately collect with the few, and government should ameliorate the consequences of that.

The same applies with regard to “public decency.” “Order and safety are not enough.” (209) Honor should govern, but this means having a conception of honor and decency. Neutrality “would be nothing but surrendering all decency” and the most degenerate would rule. Where boundaries exist, they must be considered by the government–this is a moral question.

All laws are moral, though this can be hard to see at times. We could see that when there was cultural cohesion in morality, but now we cannot. This is not to say that the government should engage in “moral formation”–that always ends poorly. The government has enough trouble self-limitation to throw that in as well.

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"No disagreement with any of that--though I've not heard "Moments" and will have to look ..."

cneal

Top of the Country: Amen

"The song is quite bouncy, even upbeat, considering the subject matter. (His "pills" ran out ..."

TheOldMaid

Top of the Country: Amen

"One noteworthy series in this area is valuable lessons in law. This series helps young ..."

Thomas White

The Law

"The longevity of Parker's lectures and teachings after his death is no more surprising than ..."

reggiebannister

Proclaiming Christ Still

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the main language of Jesus’ daily speech?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Greek Aramaic Latin Hebrew