The Media and Institutional Health

Last updated on: March 25, 2022 at 8:00 am by Coyle Neal

The Media and Institutional Health 2022-03-23T17:22:45-06:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Image: Amazon

Every couple of years when teaching a class on Congress, I have to read a number of biographies about and books by US Senators. Sometimes this is tedious or infuriating (as when I’ve got to slog through Bernie‘s or Ted‘s tripe), and sometimes it’s delightful (Teddy Roosevelt wrote a biography of Thomas Hart Benton!). And sometimes it’s just melancholy, as with Al Simpson’s book about wrestling with the media as a politician, Right in the Old Gazoo: What I learned in a lifetime of scrapping with the Press. And in case you’re wondering what a “gazoo” is, it’s a horse’s rear. Which tells you something about what he thinks about the press–though Simpson isn’t big on politicians either:

“Know the difference between a horse race and a political race? In a horse race, the entire horse runs!” (230)”

This isn’t exactly a memoir, though there is plenty of personal narrative and reflection in it. Instead, Right in the Old Gazoo is exactly what the subtitle promises: a set of reflections on Simpson’s battles with the press and his attempts to get them to live up to their own (mostly unknown) code of ethics. Simpson is clear that he is not guiltless in these fights, and that at time his temper or his sense of humor or his occasionally abrasive personality got the best of him and he said or did things he shouldn’t have. But he is also clear that the press has become more concerned with getting big headlines than with reporting the truth, and that it is utterly unwilling to admit fault or submit itself to scrutiny.

Again, that’s not to say that politicians are innocent here:

“First, reporters and politicians must lower the volume on our rhetoric….As for politicians, we must stop engaging in raw partisanship solely for its own sake. These days any senator who reaches out to the other side is too often instantly labeled disloyal, untrustworthy, a patsy, a wimp, and a traitor. Those who can actually do good work on both sides of the aisle can often lead a harrowing existence in the Congress.” (256)

What makes this such a “melancholy” book is that it was written in 1997. Simpson was making these arguments twenty-five years ago–and the situation hasn’t improved. Consider what Simpson had to say about how Supreme Court confirmation hearings were affected by the Bork hearings:

“There was a time in American when a president could nominate someone for such an office with the expectation that the Senate would conduct a fair, reasonable discussion of the person’s qualifications, and then hold a fair, sensible vote for or against confirmation. This assumption usually held true even when a president chose someone whose political leanings were different from those in the majority party of the Senate. I had always respected that tradition. In my view, the president had a right to appoint to the Supreme Court any justice he wanted, so long as they were qualified to do the work. I vote that way. The tradition I speak of was extinguished with the sabotaging of Robert Bork. Thereafter, the confirmation process became a stage for petty partisan bickering. After Bork came Senator John Tower, Zoe E. Baird, Lani Guinier, and on and on. What a sad thing for our country.” (202)

There’s really nothing revolutionary here—this has been a common complaint about the Senate for years (to say nothing about the House!). But I think it’s worth reflecting at least for a moment about how we Evangelicals engaged this problem Specifically, we have done little to deescalate political rhetoric, to reach out and work with opponents on issues we can agree on, or make good-faith offers to compromise not our principles, but on practical policy. This is not to our credit. We are at a rough moment in our history, and polarization is a large part of that. And while it is not our job as Christians to fix the problems of the world (it’s our job to witness to the Gospel of Jesus Christ), we can at least strive not to make existing problems worse. If that means we scale back extreme rhetoric, try our best to speak the truth (and expect our public figures to do the same–regardless of their political party), and work with those with whom we politically disagree, then we should do so. This twenty-five year old book is a good model of someone who–no Evangelical himself–made political career of doing those things, and doing them well.

It’s also a heck of a lot of fun, so there’s that too : )

Dr. Coyle Neal is co-host of the City of Man Podcast an Amazon Associate (which is linked in this blog), and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, MO

Previous Post

March 22, 2022

Common Grace, 2.87

Next Post

March 29, 2022 Common Grace, 2.88

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was a "phylactery," criticized by Jesus in Matthew 23?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A robe A small box with Scripture A lamp A fishing net