Common Grace, 2.32

Last updated on: April 13, 2021 at 8:00 am by Coyle Neal

Common Grace, 2.32 2021-04-07T09:44:24-06:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post is part of a series walking through the second volume of Abraham Kuyper’s Common Grace.

What “workings of grace” are functions of only particular grace?

The “presence of God’s children in this world.”
The “preaching of the world,” either hearing such preaching or reading the Scriptures for ourselves.
The Spirit “grips the emotions and the consciousness of some people.” (273)

These workings have certain characteristics. Namely the first is spontaneous and unintentional from our perspective. The second we do on purpose. And the third is a direct and mysterious work of God in the world. In turn, these workings have diverse effects:

They “affect those who are elect to salvation.”
They harden those who are not.
They affect “human life in general” and individual lives negatively by restraining sin and positively by “advancing the development of our natural powers.” (273-274)

All of these are from particular grace and for particular grace. But! They also “radiate their glimmerings” into the “completely other goal” of common grace. This is “sensed” when we use the phrase “Christian nation”/people/state/society/etc, as contrasted with “pagan” or “Islamic” states/societies/etc. The difference is not supernatural blessing, it is normal human development that has flourished in one place but not in others because of the human flourishing influenced by the cross. Pre-Golgotha, there was only natural–not human–development. (274)

So now “Christian” nations are ascendant, especially since the Reformation over the last four centuries. That is, Christian Europe is now ascendant. This is clearly not because Europe is full of super virtuous and regenerate believers, either now or in the past. Yet, the name “Christian” is held, even by those theological liberals who call on specific parts of the faith that weaken particular grace in favor of common grace. So even when we’re dealing with those who claim to be Christian but are functionally nonbelievers, particular grace strengthens common grace. This isn’t the goal of particular grace, of course, it’s just an effect of it.

The line between “modern Christians” and believers is over whether Christianity is just a reflection of the best of human nature (with Jesus as the apex), or that humanity is broken by sin and in need of Divine intervention. The doctrine of common grace keeps us from ignoring the human aspect of the faith and holding a proper balance without falling into modernism. The attempts to blend modern and orthodox into a ‘hybrid’ will fail in their three manifestations:

Philosophical: Schleiermacher, Schelling, Von Baader, use orthodox terms but end in vagueness.
Mystical: doesn’t bother trying to explain the mystery of human nature, but then reduces all mystery to psychology and largely ignores the sacred in Scripture.
Historical: attempts to get at the ‘real’ Christ behind the Scripture narratives.

These are just jumbled beliefs, made more mixed by the addition of some who may be (lapsed?) genuine believers and interested unbelievers. Still, they all exist under the umbrella of ‘Christian culture.’ (After all, our advances didn’t come form paganism or Islam.)

This is not a view endorsing cultural conservatism, with a pure “core” protecting the rest. Instead, we might think of the “core” as the regenerate church–then the worldly church, then the national church, then the tradition, then those influenced by the faith, then the good people, then those who don’t care. These are concentric circles, in which particular grace works only at the center. It influences common grace, but common grace works throughout. Even modern Christians recognize something of their debt to the center (if little else). They want the benefits without letting Christians have the influence–which suggestion we reject.

Obviously there’s a lot going on in this chapter, and an interesting jumble of stuff that is historically accurate, historically inaccurate, and theologically mixed. The next few chapters will sort some of Kuyper’s ideas out, but frankly his myopic view of his own time is a challenge to get around in parts of this chapter. Still, this is worth wrestling with: what is the impact of the church on the world, and how should we account for it? I’m not sure Kuyper has the right answer, but it’s a good question nevertheless.

Dr. Coyle Neal is co-host of the City of Man Podcast and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, MO

Previous Post

April 9, 2021

Systematic Theology: An Introduction

Next Post

April 16, 2021 The Great Russian Novel

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal is mentioned in Proverbs as having little strength but great wisdom?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lion Ant Ox Bear