Common Grace, 2.25

Last updated on: February 23, 2021 at 8:00 am by Coyle Neal

Common Grace, 2.25 2021-02-22T12:48:20-07:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post is part of a series walking through the second volume of Abraham Kuyper’s Common Grace.

What has common grace to do with the salvation of the individual soul? This question is left out of catechisms, confessions, and systematic theologies–to say nothing of sermons! Common grace exists at the point of relationship between nature and grace. At times it can feel as if there is a total separation between these two concepts, yet in reality grace renews nature. This is not a principle we wish to push too far in either direction, as we might run into error were we to do so. Grace and nature are distinct and should neither be completely separated nor completely combined.

We see two errors develop in the thinking about the relationship between nature and grace:

The Anabaptist, which sees “new life” as “a second formal creation.” “This is spiritual dualism.” (215-216)
The Arminian, which holds too tightly to the value/work of the old nature so as to functionally destroy grace.

Responding to 1., the Reformed articulated common grace. However we have tended to overlook common grace in our responses to 2. This left the door open for Anabaptist dualism to creep back into our discussions and in turn has resulted in outbreaks of heresy in competition with the repetition of old formulas without a corresponding advance in theology. Thus heresy at the universities and functional mysticism in the pews were the only two viable options for most believers. [And remember, this was written more than century ago!]

Eventually, all that was left was nature; grace was denied and nature quickly became seen as unfallen. Naturalism/materialism came to rule all things. The church subsequently no longer had the tools with which to reply to the challenges of the world and of the heretics. At best it was trying to find strength “partly in philanthropy and partly in childlike joy” during a revival. (217-218)

So philosophy stepped into the old place of theology. Schleiermacher understood this well and tried to restore theology, but really just decorated philosophy in the garb of theology. A more refined Reformed view of common grace would have offset this collapse. Now we’re paying the price in terms of public distrust.

So we must have a revival of the doctrine of common grace to bridge the chasm between nature and grace. This is tied to the nature and role of the will, as well as the question of human nature and the nature of the world. Specifically, to these things as they actually exist in relation with God through sin and blessing. The deeper sin dwells in the world, the higher grace is, the less the redeemed want to do with the world. So we need common grace as a reminder of proper balance.

But what specifically does common grace do? More on that in the next chapter.

Dr. Coyle Neal is co-host of the City of Man Podcast and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, MO

Previous Post

February 19, 2021

An interview with Carl Trueman

Next Post

February 26, 2021 The Source of our Hope

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I am twelve men sent to explore the Promised Land, but only two gave a good report. Who are we?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Messengers Leaders of Israel Explorers The twelve spies