Common Grace, 2.10

Last updated on: November 17, 2020 at 1:14 pm by Coyle Neal

Common Grace, 2.10 2020-11-17T13:14:26-07:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post is part of a series walking through the second volume of Abraham Kuyper’s Common Grace.

In the previous post Kuyper continued his discussion of the Roman Catholic and Anabaptist views of the relationship between the world and grace. In today’s chapter Kuyper continues his discussion by pointing out that up through the Reformation, the world/secular-church/holy division persisted. Monks dwelt at the peak of the ‘holy’ side of the equation, only coming in below canonized saints. This perspective then lays the groundwork, in Kuyper’s view, for the views of the Anabaptists.

The Anabaptists found themselves stuck in this dualism

“and changed it only to the extent required by their altered view of the church. From the outset they harbored two kinds of impulses that, depending on their differing instincts, conducted a very different opposition to the church: they either protested against the church from a desire to be free of the clergy, or they separated from the church out of an aversion to its externalization of the sacred.” (86)

In other words, Anabaptists can be divided into those who pursue freedom and those who pursue internal piety. Both, however, move the action of making something ‘holy’ from the church (which was the Roman Catholic view) to a direct, internal action of the Holy Spirit. The consequence is that “new creation” replaces “re-creation”, at times to the point of denying Christ’s humanity.

So for the Anabaptist, the believer is internally new with no ‘organic connection’ between this world and grace. Hence the powerful push towards avoidance of the world. No service in government, no need for formal politics among the saints, no oaths are to be taken by believers, no fighting or service in the military, are just a handful of the results of the Anabaptist position. All worldly politics and life are restraints on sin, such things are not necessary for believers. (For this last point, Kuyper is too sweeping in his conclusion–some Anabaptists certainly thought that, but not all of them.) Some Anabaptists even end as antinomians, rejecting completely the role of the Law in the life of the believer.

The result of these views was all manner of immorality. Even the visible church was at times given the boot, with gatherings of believers being merely leaderless assemblies of the regenerate led by the Holy Spirit. Another result was the idea that only their baptism counted, thus negating the views of other varieties of believers. All of this was done in the name of Scripture.

By contrast:

All of Scripture requires an “analogia fidei–that is, the norm of the confession of faith” (90)
The Anabaptists had imparted Roman Catholic theology and division of the world rather than holding to Scripture.

Attempts to correct these views have failed. At least the Roman Catholic Church has its ecclesiology as a fail-safe, keeping it in check. The Anabaptists don’t even have that, though they do have robust personal pursuits of holiness. Nevertheless, their view of confession, church, and public life has been a net loss. This makes them susceptible to modernism and the temptations of modern life.

To bring all of this back to the consecrated vs. unconsecrated discussion (soil, water, oil, vestments, etc), why shouldn’t we accept symbolism while resisting superstitution?

To help us think through this: first, we must reject any ideas of ‘magical powers.’ (91-92) Second, Scripture speaks of blessing and curse. While this is a mystery, we get the point that it is the difference between God’s favor and God’s judgment, between life and death. So we can side with God or resist Him. This is true in all things–though we do not assume that any ‘individual matter’ is a sign of curse or blessing, but rather that the whole of life now and in other generations must be examined. You and I may or may not deserve the lottery we win or the disease we catch, but we can look at the big picture and see how blessing and curse are generally moving.

Again, the question is whether all of this discussion applies to the physical world and to the spiritual world? Or only to the spiritual world? The Anabaptist says that we restrict the language of blessing and curse to the spiritual world alone. But in doing so the Anabaptist also necessarily denies the union of body and soul–including all of the Biblical symbolism that goes along with it. For example, when Adam was cursed it was a curse that affected his (and our) body and soul alike–the physical and spiritual world were both involved. Likewise communion is both a physical and spiritual activity. Not that the elements are transubstantiated or anything like that (again, see above on resisting magical powers). But that there is a physical element and a spiritual element to the activity.

More on this discussion in the next post.

Dr. Coyle Neal is co-host of the City of Man Podcast and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, MO

Previous Post

November 13, 2020

The Gospel in pictures?

Next Post

November 20, 2020 God will bless you

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul say godliness with what is great gain?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Prayer Contentment Faith Love