Common Grace, 2.6

Last updated on: October 20, 2020 at 8:00 am by Coyle Neal

Common Grace, 2.6 2020-10-19T13:14:43-06:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post is part of a series walking through the second volume of Abraham Kuyper’s Common Grace.

Continuing the discussion of ‘the problem,’ i.e. that nonbelievers aren’t as bad as the doctrine of original sin (to say nothing of total depravity) would have us believe, while believers aren’t as good as the Biblical description of sanctification makes us sound, in this chapter Kuyper turns us to the response given to the problem by the Roman Catholic Church.

Kuyper begins by noting that while we may not agree with Roman Catholicism, we must present their doctrine as they believe it without creating straw men or needlessly vilifying them. This means taking their view at its best, rather than as it might exist in the extremes of the RCC. For our own time, we’d also have to add that Kuyper is writing pre-Vatican II as well.

To help with this, Kuyper is going to draw extensively from the great Catholic theologian Bellarmine. And though the Church has changed from Bellarmine’s time, he remains a fair general representative (even though Bellarmine’s writings are not ex cathedra).

The Roman Catholic (specifically, a writer to Kuyper’s newspaper) argues that we can’t say that sin left man’s essence uncorrupted in the ruin of our nature; and instead we should have said that our essential selves are unfallen, only our accidental aspects are ruined.

In response, Kuyper argues that our essence (being) and nature (action) bust be kept distinct, rather than confused (as even some Roman Catholic theologians admit). Roman Catholic distinctions are made between righteousness, extra-natural righteousness, and supernatural righteousness. We reject the idea of an ethical holiness alien to human nature–at least pre-fall. We do see a dualism and an external intervention, but only post-sin. In creation, our nature was tied to God in itself. Post-glorification, we will shine as we were made to in our own natures. We must not add an extra layer of grace to original creation. This leaves an artificial unity in our past and in our future, with external grace latched on mechanically, rather than an organic restoration of our true selves.

More on this elsewhere, here we need only note that Roman Catholicism teaches a weakened nature, albeit one still capable of producing a civic (but non-saving) good. We say such good comes only from common grace–though Roman Catholicism admits a vague and general ‘divine assistance’ in this civic good.

So the problem is explained by recourse to a dualism in human nature working with ‘divine help.’ This elevates worldly society alongside the Church, and brings much of it into the Church in a higher form.

By contrast, we hold the world and the church together with grace–albeit separately in meaning and ultimate destination. Consequently we must reject all dualism–even that of the Roman Catholicism (and especially that of the anabaptists).

Kuyper will continue this discussion in the next chapter.

Dr. Coyle Neal is co-host of the City of Man Podcast and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, MO

Previous Post

October 16, 2020

How not to be a jerk

Next Post

October 23, 2020 George Will's Mixed Sensibility

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "Come, follow me, and I will make you fishers of men"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John the Baptist Peter Jesus Paul