Common Grace, 1.43

Last updated on: March 17, 2020 at 8:00 am by Coyle Neal

Common Grace, 1.43 2020-03-16T18:13:14-06:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post is part of a series walking through the first volume of Abraham Kuyper’s Common Grace.

Genesis 12 is the pivot point where the Bible transitions from dealing with ‘mankind as a whole’ to dealing with ‘God’s people as Israel specifically.’ At Pentecost, we have yet another pivot point where the nations are brought back in, which in turn foreshadows the great gathering of nations in Revelation 7. But in between Genesis 12 and Pentecost, and largely between Pentecost and Revelation, Scripture is ‘particular.’ That is, the bulk of the Bible is primarily focused on God’s people alone. It’s not that other nations don’t matter (Kuyper will make that clear). It is that the Bible is primarily a book written for God’s people, not for the nations.

Yet this truth has led to “dangerously promoted particularism” that disdains the fate of the nations, as well as a ‘chiliasm’ focused on the conversion of the Jews that healthy theology (i.e. Reformed theology, in Kuyper’s view) has regularly and repeatedly rejected. Reformed theology and what in our time we would call ‘dispensationalism’ are incompatible. (375-376)

This isn’t to say that we should suspect the motives of those who hold this false view–they’ve just misunderstood the relationship between particular and common grace:

“Everything here depends on the correct perception of the relationship between particular grace and common grace or, if you will, of a correct understanding of the relationship between the original work of God that we admire in creation, and the other work for which we jubilantly give thanks after having drunk from the Fountain of salvation.” (376)

Here, Kuyper isn’t tracing particular grace specifically. Instead he’s focusing on how the two forms of grace interact with each other and weave together. Specifically, we have to ask whether particular grace has supplanted common grace? Or do the two work together? Of course by this point we know the answer: we must not replace particular grace (that saves us from our sins) with common grace, but neither should we continue to ignore the importance of common grace. The result of ignorance has been chiliasm and Methodism. And what the footnotes regularly point out, Kuyper here reinforces that by “Methodism” he doesn’t mean the good sort that we get with Wesley and Whitefield which strove to revitalize the Church of England. In fact, he gives a very passionate defense of their work that is worth reading in full on pages 377 and 378. What he means is the worse side of ‘Methodism’ which favors ‘fellowship’ while disdaining the church as an institution. This (false) fellowship is generated by the mistake of collapsing the nature/grace distinction in favor of revivalistic technique. Which tells us that by ‘Methodism’ what Kuyper really means to target is ‘revivalism’ of the sort specifically practiced and championed by Charles Finner.

Yet, salvation is not uniform–not all are saved, and people are not saved in equal proportions or at equal times. There might be a thousand Americans saved here today, and a million Dutch tomorrow, and two Englishmen the day after. Etc. This shows us that particular grace works in the context of common grace. We likewise see variety in the nature of individual conversions–some people hear the Gospel young, convert, and believe their whole lives. Others convert only in old age. Yet others hear the Gospel, reject it, and come back later. Etc.

The point here is that in the variety of life both of the church and of individuals we see a diversity that is directly the result of common grace. Complexity is the rule of the day for the Reformed, while the Methodists (again, of the non-Wesley/Whitefield sort) stick to a formula for conversion, which functionally means they must start with and focus only on the worst sorts of folks who can then have the dramatic and flashy conversion story. While evangelism of this sort is important, treated exclusively it ignores the way God varies the operation of regeneration.

Abraham is the beginning of the story of particular grace in the Bible, but he is also the point of intersection between particular grace and common grace. Abraham is to be a blessing to all nations–not just to the Jews. To say this a different way, the Jews are a means of bringing about this blessing. So the call of Abraham is a call that is for, but not necessarily to, the whole human race.

Dr. Coyle Neal is co-host of the City of Man Podcast and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, MO

Previous Post

March 13, 2020

Why More Money Doesn't Make you Healthy

Next Post

March 20, 2020 Time Travel Done Right

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many days and nights did it rain during the flood?

Select your answer to see how you score.

40 10 7 12