Common Grace 1.9-10

Last updated on: September 17, 2019 at 8:00 am by Coyle Neal

Common Grace 1.9-10 2019-09-12T12:09:29-06:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What does the government have to do with capital punishment? That what Kuyper is building towards in chapters 9, 10, and 11 (the first two covered here, chatper 11 will be in the next post).

Reformed commentators have traditionally read Genesis 9:6:

Whoever sheds the blood of man,
by man shall his blood be shed,
for God made man in his own image.

as establishing capital punishment. Specifically, it is the just result of the sin of assaulting God’s image. This is an ordinance, not a description. This ordinance is to be executed in three ways:

By the government
By individuals raised “for that purpose” (75-76)
By God on the last day

While this has been the mainstream interpretation of the passage by Christians through the centuries, challenges from the anabaptists and Methodists have meant that we have to show that it is normative, not just descriptive. Specifically, we do this by noticing that God emphasizes “for God made man in his own image.” This cannot be a mere description (i.e. it can’t mean “this is the sort of thing that usually happens to people who murder”), as that would just continue the cycle of hatred.

Nor does this passage mean that our right to execute others in the name of justice is based on the image of God in us. Just as our dominion over the animals is based on the ordinance and command of God (and not on His image), so too is this a command. The “for” clause is likewise an explanation of why the murdered must be punished based on the ordinance of God. In other words, the image of God is the explanation, not the cause. Otherwise, the executioner would himself be a murderer rather than acting in accord with divine justice/mandate.

Having argued [not terribly successfully, as far as I’m concerned] that this is a command, the question is then raised of to whom the command is given? Clearly it is not to all who desire to carry out the penalty, but rather “according to established rule and order.” Hence this is the basis of government. (81-82) This is not to argue that there was no government before Genesis 9, just that this is the first divinely-sanctioned government. Prior to the Flood, government authority (such as it was) was paternal, after the Flood, it is now institutional.

Which means that Genesis 9:6 is a duty. It is from this perspective that we must engage the objections to capital punishment.

And at this point Kuyper makes a statement that I’m not sure I agree with, though I understand why he makes it. he argues (pg 83-84) that the only real objection to capital punishment is not believing that Genesis 9:6 is inspired and authoritative Scripture. I get why he says that–he’s assuming that we’ve agreed with everything he’s said about the verse up until now. But, if we don’t buy his ordinance vs. description conclusion, then we can still believe the text is inspired without having to endorse capital punishment. (For what it’s worth, I’m a capital punishment supporter, just not from this text theologically.)

But, within the scope of orthodoxy, there are some who try to argue that this command was a temporary ordinance, only in effect until the New Testament. Kuyper responds by pointing out that 1) this text is nowhere overturned in the NT (unlike, say circumcision or the food laws); and 2) this command is given to Noah and his children, some of whom are later not part of the Abrahamic covenant. Therefore, this is a general covenant to all mankind, and therefore it must stand. Besides, Romans 13:4 references Genesis 9:6 as still being in effect.

But what about the objection that capital punishment ends the possibility of conversion? Kuyper responds that the Reformed clearly think this argument is absurd–the elect are never beyond the possibility of conversion. But even Pelagians should be convinced here. I mean, they should be convinced by Reformed arguments in general, what with the Bible and all, but aside from that they should be convinced by this specific argument. Namely, modern war and modern technology kill or at least reduce the possibility of conversion far more than capital punishment, and we don’t see Pelagians lining up to end either of those. Besides, the threat of capital punishment should lead to reflection by the sentenced and a sense of justice for the victim.

As for the objection that sometimes the innocent are mistakenly executed, Kuyper agrees that this does happen and that it is a terrible injustice. But that line of reasoning would eliminate all government actions. Yes, lives are involved, but lives are always involved when the government does something. Welfare checks go astray and people go hungry; diplomatic errors lead to wars; etc. The mistakes should not govern the principles.

Finally, Kuyper responds to the objection that capital punishment debases the image of God in human beings. To this he says that it can certainly be used badly, but that doesn’t make it wrong. When it is used correctly, the image of God in human beings shines more brightly as His justice is seen in a proper way in the world.

Whatever we think of Kuyper’s arguments, he does have a good concluding point: we should never fall back on statistics in our arguments or use deterrence as a rationale. Capital punishment is either an ordinance or it is not. If it is, then we are to obey. If it is not, then we are under no such obligation to do so.

Dr. Coyle Neal is co-host of the City of Man Podcast and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, MO

Previous Post

September 13, 2019

An Essential Tool for Spiritual Warfare

Next Post

September 20, 2019 When "Being Dad" isn't quite enough

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many books are in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

27 70 66 39