The Binding’s Nature Problem

Last updated on: April 30, 2019 at 8:00 am by Coyle Neal

The Binding’s Nature Problem 2019-04-29T15:29:46-06:00 Coyle Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve been slowly working my way through Bridget Collins’ new book The Binding. So far, it’s fairly well-written and has an interesting enough premise. Namely, the hook is that in Emmett Farmer’s world, “books” are written when a “binder” transfers (i.e. “binds”) the memories of a person to a piece of paper. These memories are then gone from the individual’s head and “bound” into a book, unless the book is destroyed in which case they are returned to the person who gave them up in the first place.

That’s a setting, of course, not a plot. The plot revolves around the relationship between Emmett and local aristocrat Lucian Darnay and Emmett’s path transitioning from being a farmer to being a binder.

I’m only about 2/3 of the way through the book, and again there are some interesting enough bits to keep me going (professionalization/industrialization of the trades vs. artisan craftsmanship from the home; the nature of farm work; generational conflict; virtuous peasants vs. corrupt aristocrats; etc). It helps that Collins is clearly a talented writer who is working in an unique world.

Image: HarperCollins

But one of the issues that has particularly stuck out so far is the question of why homosexuality is so objectionable in the world of this particular novel. After all, one thing we’re told fairly often (and fairly loudly) in our own time and place is that religion–often especially Christianity–is the source of biases against this orientation. Only when we’ve kicked off centuries of built-up religious prejudices will society accept that love knows no boundaries, and only then will everyone be happy.

And yet, in the world of The Binding, for at least the first 2/3 of the book there seems to be not only no Christianity, but there appears to be no real religion of any kind whatsoever. Sure, there is mention of a past “Crusade” against “binders” (who, admittedly, have the ability to take people’s memories through obviously supernatural means), but again no religious meaning is attributed to that. While some kind of explanation might be forthcoming in the end of the book that involves Christians or other theists doing awful things to people of same-sex orientation, until that happens, it seems that The Binding has a problem with nature. (Of course if such an explanation does come, then this blog post will be moot. So take this for what it’s worth.)

At least, The Binding might have a problem with nature. Where does the prejudice that is the source of so much of the book’s action come from? Why aren’t Emmett and Lucian allowed to be together? The way I see it, there are only really a few options: 1) a cheap plot device not meant to be questioned; 2) the assumption that all of us will assume religion is automatically the source of all such prejudices, and hence the further assumption that no exposition to this end is necessary (which is really just another way of saying “sloppy writing;” this wouldn’t be in line with the otherwise high-quality writing in this book); or 3) some (so-far) un-mentioned past event/belief/tradition that created these prejudices in the world of the book; or 4) the book is assuming that there really is something counter-to-nature in these kinds of relationships.

That final option would be surprising, given that this is a mainstream novel and that such a position is in line with traditional Christian sexual ethics. (Which don’t need to be gone over here–you can see the Nashville Statement for that, or you can listen to a conversation with one of its authors here.) Which means how this book is resolved will be worth paying attention to. If the pressure to reject these inclinations is not the result of centuries of religious influence, but instead comes from nature itself, then the world of The Binding creates a conversational framework very different from the one in which our society currently operates.

And as you can probably tell, I’m enjoying this book. I’d encourage you to go do the same. At least, you should enjoy the first 2/3 of it. No promises about the rest.

Dr. Coyle Neal is co-host of the City of Man Podcast and an Associate Professor of Political Science at Southwest Baptist University in Bolivar, MO

Books

Fantasy

Politics

Previous Post

April 26, 2019

Another Book on Parenting

Next Post

May 3, 2019 You are what you remember

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who did Paul send to check on the Thessalonians when he could not come himself?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Silas Timothy Titus Luke