When Mocking Jews Was Cool

Last updated on: July 17, 2013 at 6:00 am by Paul D. Miller

When Mocking Jews Was Cool 2013-07-17T06:00:14-06:00 Paul D. Miller

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Gentleman’s Agreement, directed by Elia Kazan

I hate political correctness. It is illiberal to police what people think and say, to judge what sort of opinions are acceptable in polite company: who is to saythat the sensibilities of polite company are all that refined? Who wants their approval anyway?

My dislike of political correctness is the luxury of living in an era awash with it. Gentleman’s Agreement (1947) is a reminder that in other eras—including, roughly, all of them before ours—prejudice and bigotry didn’t have to hide and real people suffered for it.

Gentleman’s Agreement is the story of Philip Green (played with adult gravitas by Gregory Peck, who received one of his five Oscar nominations for the role), a writer who pretends to be Jewish to write an exposé on anti-Semitism. The pretense works too well, complicating his romance with Kathy (Dorothy McGuire) and endangering his son. Made in the shadow of the Holocaust, the film won the 1947 Oscars for Best Picture, Director, and supporting Actress, and was nominated for five others.

That the film does not focus on the Holocaust, which does not get a single mention in the film, nor on any other act of violent anti-Semitism—no one gets beat up or killed in this movie—allows it instead to highlight the subtle, often unspoken forms of discrimination in polite circles. Green moves in the aristocratic crowd of New York high society and New England’s established families. The denounce anti-Semitism to a man and insist that some of their best friends are Jews. They all know the correct thing to say.

But Green is denied entry to clubs; turned away at a fancy hotel; encounters awkward silences at society dinners; and finds that word of his Jewishness seems to get around ahead of him so that when he introduces himself to new acquaintances they already know he is “Phil Green, Jew.” The guest list for one dinner seems to have been culled of those who might have made trouble if they discovered they were dining with a Jew. Phil’s son is taunted and threatened at school.

If the film has a fault, it is that it is too obviously an Important Movie with a Serious Message. Occasionally the characters are too earnest and there are one too many monologues about the importance of fighting injustice—at one point Phil gives an updated version of Shylock’s famous speech. I earlier faulted WALL-e for wearing its sanctimonious heart on its sleeve, and Gentleman’s Agreement comes close to the same thing. What saves it is that, if any story ever had a right to parade it’s own importance, it is a story about anti-Semitism made right after the Holocaust. The same tone made about a smaller issue would come off as self-serious and pompous.

I was struck by one scene near the end. Phil’s son is taunted at school. He comes home shaken and scared. Phil’s fiancé tries to comfort him by assuring him he isn’t really Jewish. Phil in turn scolds her.

You’ve only assured him he’s the most wonderful of all creatures–a white Christian American. You instantly gave him that lovely taste of superiority, the poison that millions of parents drop into the minds of children.

The condemnation of white Christian Americans’ self-righteousness and hypocrisy is, today, merely de rigueur—it’s just something you say to clear your throat at the start of a cocktail party to establish your credentials as an appropriately guilty progressive—but it is startling to hear it in a movie from 1947, to hear it with a little passion, and to hear it in a context where it actually meant something and was a little risky to say it.

That gave me some food for thought about the culture of political correctness. In the 1940s, anti-Semitism was, in elite Waspy circles, politically correct. White Christian men of the establishment were expected to defend the system of privilege that kept women, blacks, Jews, and others in a position of disadvantage. Today, anti-Semitism is politically incorrect. Expressing an anti-Semitic (or sexist, racist, or homophobic) opinion will get you shunned and possibly fired. The change is for the better—but the fact that there had to be a change tells you that the people who define what an acceptable opinion is don’t always get it right: trusting in the judgment of the culture and its elite opinion-makers is a sure way to find yourself on the wrong side of something at some point.

That, in turn, suggests how shallow political correctness is. Political correctness is just another word for popular prejudice. Today, prejudice is against anti-Semites, racists, and so forth. All told, I’d rather have prejudice be against rather than for such blatant sin and elitism. Large chunks of the Bible condemn treating the rich with privilege, and one of the distinctive marks of the early church was its egalitarianism towards women, widows, orphans, and the poor.

But at the end of the day, it is still just prejudice—fickle, easily-changed, often more emotive than intellectual. Fighting against anti-Semitism (and its bigoted cousins) by erecting a system of anti-anti-Semitism amounts to rearranging the prejudices that inevitably pervade civilization. I’m not saying there is a moral equivalence here—but there is a sociological one in that they are both prejudices.

I belabor the point because cultivating good prejudices may help create a more polite society but they do not remove sin from the human heart. Our hatred of bigotry should be rooted in our theological understanding that God made all people in his image and are equal in worth and dignity, not in a fear of what other people will think if we express the wrong opinion. Meanwhile, I wonder if the culture of political correctness cheapens true righteous indignation by giving us a script to follow. A few paragraphs ago I dismissed the condemnation of white American Christians’ self-righteousness and hypocrisy because it has become too routine and overdone—but self-righteousness and hypocrisy deserve condemnation. Political correctness is like the boy who cries wolf.

We are far afield from Gentleman’s Agreement. It is a strong testament to the film that the issues it raises are still pertinent today, no doubt in ways the filmmakers could not have foreseen. The film is a good picture of what it looks like to fight prejudice when it isn’t popular to do so. Sadly, there will always be some category of people on the bottom rung of society’s ladder, making this film salutary in any era.

Previous Post

July 15, 2013

Snow White Showing Her Age

Next Post

July 19, 2013 Glittery Vampires in Love

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who tricked Isaac into giving him Esau's blessing?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Laban Jacob Leah Rebekah