Star Trek Into Moral Leadership

Last updated on: May 17, 2013 at 6:07 am by Kendrick Kuo

Star Trek Into Moral Leadership 2013-05-17T06:07:33-06:00 Kendrick Kuo

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Review of Star Trek Into Darkness, Directed by J. J. Abrams

A confession: I am not a Trekkie. I watched the film as someone with very little education on the Star Trek universe, having only seen Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, Star Trek: First Contact, and J. J. Abrams’s Star Trek. If you want a perspective on Star Trek Into Darkness from a Trekkie perspective, read Paul Miller’s review. In fact, on the way to the theater, Paul was the one explaining to me the way the franchise/universe works. From a non-Trekkie point of view, Star Trek Into Darkness was a great success and matched the caliber of the previous film.

For those who have not seen the trailer, this second installment of Abrams’s planned trilogy centers on a villain named John Harrison. This terrorist mastermind, using a “suicide bomber,” detonates a bomb in what appears to be the heart of London. Kirk and the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise embark on a manhunt to bring the mysterious John Harrison (Benedict Cumberbatch, who gives a stunning performance) to justice and discover a more sinister plot unfolding.

The relationship between James T. Kirk (Chris Pine) and Spock (Zachary Quinto) remains the emotional anchor of Abrams’s franchise. Spock’s friendship with Kirk and romance with Uhura are both complicated by his logic-driven Vulcan nature, but this makes the scenes where Spock displays authentic longing, love, and grief all the more touching. While I felt that the Kirk-Spock relationship was not as robust as the first film, audiences should expect the capital built in the that film to propel them in the second.

It’s difficult to provide substantive thoughts on a film without giving away all the fun twists, so I will keep the rest of this review as vague as possible. Kirk is faced with several ethical dilemmas throughout Star Trek Into Darkness. With Kirk there’s always the instinctual, risk-taking streak that audiences vicariously identify with since Kirk’s doing what they wish they would do, but in reality would likely play the note of caution. We saw this in Star Trek and we see it again in Star Trek Into Darkness. In Freudian terms, Kirk’s id is tempered by Spock’s super-ego, which leads to the collective ego that renders the (hopefully correct) judgment.

But we also see a new dimension added. Not only is Kirk torn between obeying superiors and following his gut, we face the ethical dilemma of using evil for good. For those with a foreign policy background, Star Trek Into Darkness will smack of the war on terror. How do we use “frenemies”? Alliances with the best worst friend (ahem, Pakistan). What’s the legality behind drones? These questions will likely come to mind. Kirk frequently has to choose between the lesser of two evils–the one for the many.

In facing these ethical conundrums, Kirk “earns his chair” as captain. The film is upholding a model of servant leadership where the captain always puts his crew first and thus earns their respect and loyalty. This Christ-rooted ideal of servanthood is pitted against the savage Nietzschean figure of John Harrison, who at one point in the film is described as “a superman,” a direct allusion to Nietzche’s ubermensch. Yet John Harrison’s vision of life is not purely atomistic because he has a deep care for his own crew.

Kirk’s risky decisions to protect his crew are matched by Harrison’s own. Harrison draws the parallels himself during Kirk’s brief interrogation. So personal sacrifice for the many is not self-legitimizing. A moral standard still exists and audiences are intuitively aware of the difference between Kirk and Harrison’s leadership. Leadership is not merely about sacrifice, but the ultimate goal–the moral destination the leader is taking his crew.

As Star Trek In Darkness seems to near the end, audiences will be pleasantly surprised time and again that the plot is not concluded. I counted at least three endings. Personally, I was glad that each soft-ending wasn’t the end since I was enjoying myself. If anything else, I think that’s a sign of the film’s success. I was gripped by the story and sat back as Abrams took me for a soft landing that was all the richer because of the care he took in the final major plot endings.

So what’s next? Both Star Trek and Star Trek In Darkness focus on a villain and the attendant heroics, but I hope the third film will return to the roots of Star Trek and tell a story of exploration. Admittedly, films of man (or Vulcan, or other race) versus nature are trickier and takes more skill to pull off well, but in so doing Abrams will help distinguish his Star Trek franchise for his upcoming Star Wars lineup. And, I’m sure, Trekkies everywhere will rejoice at a return to the quintessential Star Trek narrative.

The ending of Star Trek In Darkness is postured well to graft this alternative Star Trek world into the mainstream Star Trek universe where the U.S.S. Enterprise embarks on a five-year mission “to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before.”

Previous Post

May 16, 2013

Star Trek Into Terror

Next Post

May 20, 2013 Double Indemnity: Bleak Justice in Classic Noir

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who found the Book of the Law in the Temple during Josiah's reign?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shemaiah Jehoiada Hilkiah the priest Joab