Lincoln

Last updated on: November 15, 2012 at 6:51 am by Paul D. Miller

Lincoln 2012-11-15T06:51:05-07:00 Paul D. Miller

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Review of Lincoln, Directed by Steven Spielberg

By PAUL D. MILLER

There is a scene near the end of Steven Spielberg’s luminescent new film Lincoln in which the President paces the White House alone waiting for news of the House of Representatives’ vote on the 13 Amendment, which will abolish slavery once and for all. It is the moment that will solidify his legacy and ensure the Civil War was fought for something worthwhile. Bells begin ringing across the city in celebration, heralding the news. Lincoln opens the window to hear the music. His son runs into the room and jumps into his arms. Light pours in from the window on the two of them. Father and son celebrate the moment together, bathed in music and light.

Spielberg has given us many, many moments of sentiment and poetry on screen over the decades of his long and celebrated career. This ranks among my very favorites. You need to see this movie.

There is clique of film snobs who make a hobby out of hating Spielberg’s work. They complain that his movies are sentimental and simplistic, pander to the lowest common denominator, and cheapen cinema by going for spectacle over substance. They blame him for pioneering product placement (I challenge you to think of E.T. (1982) without thinking of Reese’s Pieces) and ushering in the blockbuster era (e.g., Jaws (1975) and Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981)).

The problem with such critics is that they never had fun as children and think no one else should be allowed to either. Perhaps they studied too much theory in college, or aspired to be the next Ingmar Bergman and felt thwarted when no one wanted to pay to see their student film. Movies are art, but they are also entertainment. Every great work of art was done by an artist who wanted to get paid for it. Spielberg, whose films have collectively grossed $9 billion at the global box office, is simply one of the best-selling artists in world history.

And yes, he is an artist. Listen to the haters and you’d think Spielberg was Jerry Bruckheimer’s evil twin. In reality, Spielberg was doing “serious” films as early as The Color Purple in 1985, long before Schindler’s List (1993) or Munich (2005). And even when Spielberg does popcorn flicks, he does them with quality and style. Spielberg’s movies have been nominated for a whopping 112 Oscars, including 7 for Best Picture and 6 for Best Director. Incredibly, five of his films—Jaws, Raiders, and E.T., along with Schindler’s List and Saving Private Ryan (1998)—are on AFI’s list of the greatest films of all time.

Lincoln takes its place among these masterpieces. The film is part political drama, part biopic, part period-piece. Spielberg’s previous forays into history didn’t suggest greatness. Amistad (1997) and War Horse (2011) were perfectly competent and enjoyable films, but the former lacked passion and the latter unity. I feared Lincoln would be lifeless, inaccurate, or a jumble of well-acted but disconnected scenes. Lincoln is, instead, gripping, intense, heartbreaking, funny—and, yes, warm and inspiring, as such movies must be.

The plot follows the political machinations surrounding the passage of the 13th Amendment in the opening months of 1865. This part of the movie is surprisingly spry and witty, thanks in large part of Tommy Lee Jones’ scene-stealing turn as Representative Thaddeus Stevens and—perhaps—the livelier and smarter nature of politics in the 19th Century compared to our own time. I wish politicians knew how to insult one another the way Jones does here.

The drama centers on Lincoln the man, husband, and father. This is the part of the film that is deeply moving. Lincoln’s young son Tad is present in most scenes with Lincoln, and the relationship between the two is affectionate, kind, and playful. The relationship is thrown into sharp relief when Tad bursts into the office while Lincoln is having a serious meeting with his Secretaries of War and State. Lincoln’s easy simultaneous handling of both relationships—warm and personal towards his son, businesslike with his staff—shows a man of great emotional depth and sensitivity. Such maturity was gained through trial: Lincoln lost two other sons, William and Edward, in their youth; Lincoln’s marriage was troubled, as was his relationship with his older son, Robert, who wants to join the army to escape his father’s shadow.

Lincoln is often described as melancholy, wise, charming, funny, solitary, as a great story-teller, a canny politician, a methodical lawyer, and a lot of other things. So much mythology and monumentality have grown up around Lincoln that it is hard to envision him as an actual human. The screenplay and, more so, Daniel Day-Lewis’ interpretation of Lincoln clear away the clutter and bring the disparate strands of his character together in a believable, living portrait. If Day-Lewis doesn’t win an Oscar for his portrayal of the Great Emancipator, the Academy should vote itself out of existence.

Lincoln believed he needed the 13th Amendment to solidify the war’s purpose. Critics in Congress and in his own cabinet believed the Amendment was unnecessary and would make peace with the Confederacy harder to achieve. Lincoln didn’t disagree—but he understood that there is something more important than peace—and that is justice. Lincoln knew that wars must have a moral purpose, the achievement of which justifies the use of lethal violence. Without moral purpose, war is simply murder. The 13th Amendment made permanent and irrevocable the abolition of slavery, and the Confederate states could come back into the Union having accepted the end of slavery, or not at all. Passing the 13th Amendment gave the war its moral purpose, made the war worthwhile, and justified the sacrifice of the previous four years. It may have delayed the peace by a few months, but it made the peace more durable and just. That is the difference between merely ending a war, and winning it.

Previous Post

November 14, 2012

Patience is a Virtue

Next Post

November 16, 2012 Slain in the Spirit: An Author's Journey and a Pentecostal Promise

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian tradition developed the doctrine of the Holy Trinity most systematically?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Pentecostalism Jehovah's Witnesses Quakerism Nicene Christianity