Review of Total Recall

Last updated on: August 3, 2012 at 5:31 am by Alexis Neal

Review of Total Recall 2012-08-03T05:31:05-06:00 Alexis Neal

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Review of Total Recall, Directed by Len Wiseman

By ALEXIS NEAL

Factory worker Doug Quaid is dissatisfied with his lot. He lives in a miserable post-apocalyptic world that is sharply divided along economic lines. What remains of humanity is crammed into two vastly overcrowded zones—the United Federation of Britain, home of the haves, and what is known as the Colony (modern day Australia), home of the have-nots. Every day he takes ‘The Fall’ through the center of the earth to put in another day at the same dead end job. He talks to the same people. He comes home every night to his crummy apartment and his (admittedly hot) wife. And every night, he is plagued by a recurring nightmare filled with danger, fear . . . and a woman he’s never met. In the midst of all this, he longs to be a part of something more—something that matters. Eager to add a little adventure, a little meaning, to his life, Doug pays a visit to Rekall, a company specializing in manufactured memories. But the pre-op brain scan reveals that Doug may not be who he always thought he was. Now he’s on the run, and powerful people want him dead, for reasons he doesn’t fully understand. With a little help from the girl of his dreams (no, really), Doug sets out to discover his true identity, as millions of lives hang in the balance.

First off, a disclosure. I have not seen the original Total Recall. Clearly, this is a character defect on my part, as all early Arnold films are cinematic masterpieces. So if there were hidden nods to the original, or if the filmmakers tinkered with some sacred scene or snatch of dialogue, it’s lost on me. I write to you from a place where this is the only Total Recall in existence. Won’t you join me?

Let’s start with the basics: This is a fun movie. Yes, Colin Farrell spends the bulk of the movie blundering about with a bewildered look on his face. Fortunately, Farrell does bewildered extremely well, and his wide-eyed innocence and natural charisma endear him to the audience from the get-go. Kate Beckinsdale has apparently not aged a day since Underworld, and it turns out she makes a far better villainess than a rom-com queen. The screening audience reacted audibly every time she burst into a scene, hot on the trail of our leading man and ready to beat him to a bloody pulp. Which she did quite believably on more than one occasion (take notes, Angelina Jolie in Salt). Jessica Biel was sweet enough, but was ultimately a rather uninspired choice as the mysterious ‘dream woman’. Bryan Cranston appears to have a gift for villainy, and Bill Nighy is utterly wasted on an unfortunate bit of speechifying.

But truthfully, the acting (or ‘acting’) in a film like this is just filler until the next big fight scene/action sequence can commence. And there are loads of both. The Foley guys go a bit nuts a few times (as when Beckinsdale and Biel face off wielding blows like sledgehammers, at least if the sound effects are to be believed). There is the usual slick advanced technology, including a few new (to me) ideas, including a subway through the center of the earth (complete with gravity reversal at the core), a hand phone, and a multitasking piano. The violence is largely of the ‘action’ variety (minimal gore) and the brief nudity is just that: brief (and from what I hear, fans of the original will know exactly what to expect in that department).

The heart of this movie, such as it is, focuses on identity. Is who you are dependent on who you were? Is your present self a continuation of past—a combination of all your past selves? If you become disconnected from your past, are you still you? The answer, according to this movie, is yes. You are free to start over at any time; you have only to choose to leave the past behind. The past does not matter and it has no say in who you are in the present. There are echoes here of the nearly universal desire for renewal. There is something terribly appealing about a blank slate—about being able to let go of everything that’s gone before and emerge into the future unfettered by past mistakes. Indeed, Doug Quaid’s passion for knowing his past is significantly curtailed as he begins to suspect that the past may hold some very unpleasant things—not just things that happened to him, but things within him. He may not like himself, and the thought terrifies him.

All this discussion of new identities skirts around the edges of the Christian understanding of rebirth, without ever actually landing on it. As Christians, we experience new life—the old is gone and the new has come (II Cor. 5:17). We reject what we once were and strive to take hold of and experience our new identity (Rom. 6:6-7; Eph. 4:22-24). However, this is no unilateral act; we cannot erase the past by sheer willpower. Our present (or future) actions cannot undo the past. Immediately after exhorting us that we are new creations, Paul reminds us that this change is a result of the gospel: “All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ […] not counting men’s sins against them.” (II Cor. 5:18-19) The Bible tells us that the past must be dealt with; it cannot simply be ignored. We cannot simply ‘forget’ our sins and start afresh. And even if we could forget them, God would not. Our sins follow us. We carry them with us everywhere we go. The only solution to this state of affairs—the only way to really be made new—is not amnesia, but Christ. He bore all of our sins, past, present, and future.

And this is another demonstration of the power of the past—that Christ died for us. In the past. It is finished. The penalty for sin—for the past—is costly, but it has been paid, once and for all, by the only person in all of history who never sinned. He is the only man with a perfect past, the only man who never needed to be made new, and He gave his life to erase my past. In the past He died, taking on Himself the wrath that was the just penalty for sin, to give new life and a fresh start to those who have faith in Him. And in the present, His strength enables us to reject the old self and strive to live up to what we have become, by the grace of God. Though our salvation affects how we behave in the present and the future, it does not hinge upon those actions; instead, our salvation is based on the unchangeable past actions of a holy and merciful God. For Christians, that is the true source of our identity.

Previous Post

August 2, 2012

Inferno

Next Post

August 3, 2012 Review of Total Recall by Someone who has seen the Original Version

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Action AFI Top 100 Animation Best Picture Winner BFI Top 250 Biography Biopic Books Childrens Christian Classics Classics Comedy Crime Documentary Drama Editor's Choice Family Fantasy Fantasy Films Foreign Historical Historical Fiction History Horror Horror IMDB Top 250 Indie Memoir Modern Novel Musical Mystery Non-Fiction Oscars Philosophy Poetry Popular Literature Reading and Writing Reality Romance Science Fiction Science Fiction Silent Sports Thriller TV Show Uncategorized Western Westerns Young Adult

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 June 2017 January 2017 December 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the mother of Samuel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sarah Hannah Deborah Mary