Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Sarah Over the Moon

Home
New Visions
Racism, Dehumanization, and Trayvon Martin

Racism, Dehumanization, and Trayvon Martin

Last updated on: July 22, 2013 at 2:01 am by Sarah Moon

Racism, Dehumanization, and Trayvon Martin 2013-07-22T02:01:41-05:00 Sarah Moon

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Trigger Warning: Racism, dehumanization, discussion of racial violence and the George Zimmerman case

I’ve spent a few blog posts recently talking about the way that the patriarchal mindsets in some popular Christian dating books dehumanize both men and women in specific ways. They dehumanize men to absolve men of responsibility, or to use “bad” men as a threat to women who refuse to submit to the “loving, godly leadership” of “good” men. They dehumanize women in order to keep women tied to traditional gender roles, and in ways that make women responsible for how men treat them.

In doing my background research for my You Are Not Your Own series, however, I learned that dehumanization is not just a tool of the patriarchy used to oppress women. Just about every form of oppression uses dehumanization, and the recent George Zimmerman trial has brought to popular attention the way that white supremacy uses dehumanization to oppress black people.

When I read a book like When God Writes Your Love Story, as a white woman, and I hear the authors draw a line between the “good” men who act like Jesus and the “bad” men who act like animals, specific images come to mind.

Sitting in my father’s car, stopped at a red light, when a black man starts to cross the street. My father telling me “lock your door!”

My mother, telling me I can’t go by myself to visit my friend who lives in Detroit. When I ask her why, her answer is “because you’re a pretty white girl.”

My father, again, telling me I’d better never date a black man.

Sometimes I wonder if my experiences are unique because I and my parents both grew up in a fundamentalist church setting, but when I read responses to the death of Trayvon Martin I know that’s not true.

White America sees black men as the “bad” animals that need to be either tamed, locked up, or put down, for the protection of white women. It’s been that way throughout this country’s history, and it’d be easy for me, as a white woman, to pretend that things have changed and that my family’s fear of black men was an anomaly. But that simply isn’t the case. White women are still treated as weak animals that need protection from black men, who are treated as aggressive animals. Racism is used to convince white women to submit to white men for their own good, and the idea of “protecting white women” is still used to justify many levels of violence toward people of color.

I mentioned earlier that in the context of patriarchy, saying “men are animals” is a way of excusing them from responsibility for their actions. This is NOT true when we’re talking about the dehumanization of black men in the context of white supremacy.

I think about Dateable, by Justin Lookadoo and Hayley DiMarco, one of the books I analyzed for my “You Are Not Your Own” project. Men are talked about as animals or cavemen throughout the book, and this is usually used to say “that’s just how men are.” But the narrative changes drastically in the one place in the entire book when the authors are obviously addressing black men.

The context of this one place where black men are specifically addressed is, strangely, in a chapter about modesty addressed to women called “If What You’re Showing Ain’t On the Menu, Keep It Covered Up.” Right away, we see the dehumanization of women (their bodies being talked about as food) used not to absolve women of responsibility, but to place blame on them when they are treated badly. The authors state, “If you dress like a piece of meat, you’re gonna get thrown on the BBQ.” (p. 110)

The author’s continue, saying, “people will treat you the way you’re wrapped.” Then suddenly, the authors aren’t talking about women and modesty anymore.

They’re talking about black men having “baggy pants hanging down to your rear and your hat turned sideways, talking like you do with your friends.” They’re talking about black young men dressing like black young men and talking like black young men do. They tell these young men not to blame racism when they are treated like “pieces of meat,” saying, “It’s not racial. It’s not prejudice. It’s not that they don’t like you. It’s just that they are treating you the way you are presenting yourself.” (p. 112)

Black men are dehumanized here, but they don’t get the privilege of the “get out of anything free card” that white men get in exchange for dehumanization. In fact, black men are told to take responsibility when others treat them like shit. They shouldn’t have been acting like, looking like, or talking like a black person (and though this book seems to be specifically addressing black men, not specifically black women, from the way white people responded to Rachel Jeantel’s testimony in the Zimmerman trial, it’s obvious that “talking like you do with your friends” is something that White America punishes in black women as well).

I thought of this quote as I listened to white responses to the George Zimmerman trial. Over and over again, “Why didn’t the media show pictures of Trayvon Martin dressed like a thug?” as if the way Trayvon Martin was dressed justified George Zimmerman murdering him. Trayvon Martin’s dressing like a young black man, in a racist world where young black men are seen as dangerous animals and where white men are still convinced that they need to protect their wives and daughters from these “animals,” meant that he was just “asking” to be put down.

White Americans, our passive acceptance of these dehumanizing narratives leads to so many deaths, so many unjust imprisonments. It leads to so many people feeling they must reject their culture or hide it in certain spaces. As long as we continue to accept the racist notion that black men are animals who prey on white women (or white people in general), as long as we continue to say that dressing like a young black man, talking like a young black man, or even just being a young black man is “asking for it,” we have blood on our hands.

I’ve called many times for people to repent of the violent dehumanization that results from sexism and patriarchy. But now I speak to myself and to my fellow white people when I say that we need to look at our prejudices, our privilege, and our participation in systems of oppression, and we need to repent for the ways we’ve reinforced white supremacy.

Dehumanization is violence. It needs to end.

Previous Post

July 21, 2013

"You Are Not Your Own:" Women are objects, or weaker animals

Next Post

July 23, 2013 Learning the Words: Justice

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month June 2017 March 2017 November 2016 October 2016 July 2016 June 2016 March 2016 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Solomon Job Joseph