A Progressive Perspective on a Personal God.

Last updated on: March 7, 2024 at 9:25 am by Roger Wolsey

0 Comments

A Progressive Perspective on a Personal God. 2024-03-07T09:25:24-07:00 Roger Wolsey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A Progressive Perspective on a Personal God.

A question asked of me and how I responded:

Like many, I gave up the grandfatherly-spirit-in-the-sky notion of God along with childhood. The works of Spong, Borg, McLaren, Rohr, Rolheiser, and others have influenced the evolution of my understanding of God to involve less of a theistic “being” and more of a panentheistic [perspective]. I find myself at a loss for the “personal connection.” Jesus called God “Abba” in highly personal terms. But a personal relationship has to be among “persons,” right? Do you have any thoughts on having a “personal relationship” with something beyond personhood?

A: By Rev. Roger Wolsey

Dear M, I relate to your question. I too feel this tension and challenge. It’s hard to pray to a God as “It” or as “the Ground of All Being.” Such language feels impersonal and sterile. I would first observe that all of the theologians you’ve mentioned are men and I’d like to remind us that there are many theologians who are women who have much to add to this conversation. The first who comes to mind is Sallie McFague who suggests that we view the entire universe/all of Creation as “the body of God.” She thus presents treating the earth (and galaxy) well and engaging in Creation care as a potent way to interact with the Divine. That said, the Bible twice states that “God is love.” That insight rings true for me. As many progressive Christians see it, the Divine is either “a God of boundless, reckless, indiscriminate, awe-inspiring, wide-open, healing, communal Love, grace, and mercy – or [we] want nothing to do with it.” *

I tend to envision God as being a gigantic womb that surrounds the entire Cosmos and as the massive Field of Love which is ultimately reality – and who each of us truly are in our essence. All language – including theology – is of course ultimately symbolic, metaphor, and poetry. That awareness should help reduce the need for anyone to “be right” and to invite grace and welcome for all of our varying words and interpretations.

Our words about God necessarily color and impact how we experience the Divine. I experience and commune with the Divine as a fractal/child/being of God immersed in the embryonic fluid of grace and as a being created by Love as and for love as I commune with other beings of love in the shared field of Love. This experience is perhaps a form of Christian mysticism whereby our deepest and truest selves encounter and experience each other (including all believers – and all of Creation – past, present, and future) and the fullness of the Divine in a state of deep unceasing communion.

We each have our own and differing needs and degrees of personifying the Divine and I think it’s best if we each allow each other to employ the language that we each prefer. This is of course more easily done if others aren’t requiring us to employ their preferred language.

Perhaps on a related note, God is first referred to as Elohim in Genesis chapter 1, and God is presented as saying “Let us create humankind in our image.” Elohim conveys the fullness and plurality of the Divine and it would seem that a fine pronoun to use to refer to God is “They/Them” – which has been used in the singular in English since the 1300s. I tend to refer to God by simply saying “God, Love, the Divine, Holy One” without using pronouns at all. Somehow doing this is “personal enough.”

Blessings to us all as we seek to commune with the Divine and each other in ways that work best for each of us.

XX ~ Roger

(* words of Steve Andrews posted as a comment on a post on the Kissing Fish Book Facebook page Jan. 20, 2024)
p.s. I refer to God as She and Her about as frequently as I do as He and His/Him in my book “Kissing Fish” It is handicapping for English to not have a gender neutral pronoun. Sometimes, I think it might be a good idea to refer to God as “Y’allweh.” This has the added benefit of reminding us of the Trinity – the relational aspects of the Divine – which in turn, invite us to embrace the relational aspects of ourselves in community with others.

Rev. Roger Wolsey is a certified Spiritual Director, United Methodist pastor, and serves on the Board of Directors of ProgressiveChristianity.Org. He is a contributing writer for the Progressing Spirit newsletter, and author of Kissing Fish: christianity for people who don’t like christianity His new book, Discovering Fire: Spiritual Practices That Transform Lives, is available on Amazon.

Relationships and Religion

Uncategorized

God

progressive chrisianity

pronouns

theology

Previous Post

February 12, 2024

The Prophecies - Are False.

Next Post

May 2, 2024 The Zombie Apocalypse And Christian Nationalism

What is the longest verse in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Romans 8:28 John 3:16 Esther 8:9 Psalm 119:105