Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

The Holy Kiss

Home
Progressive Christian
The Bathwater AND the Baby?

The Bathwater AND the Baby?

Last updated on: October 2, 2019 at 4:45 am by Roger Wolsey

The Bathwater AND the Baby? 2019-10-02T04:45:40-07:00 Roger Wolsey

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Christmas is upon us. What is Christmas? How are progressive Christians to understand it? Can we even celebrate it at all?

Most progressive Christians embrace the scholarship that points to how the stories of Jesus’ birth were tacked onto the faith well after the original gospel of Mark was written down – without any mention of his birth. Most progressive Christians consider those birth stories to be myths – myths that drew from certain portions of the Hebraic tradition, as well as pulling in certain features of several pagan birth narratives, that were woven-in in order to help both some of the Jewish and gentile communities to come ‘round to accepting Jesus, the Gospel, and Christianity. Most progressive Christians know that since several pre-existent religious traditions had long histories of demi-gods of “royal decent”, involving stars, being born “to virgins,” in caves/cow sheds, etc. (though the alleged associations with the Egyptian god Horus are bunk) – and since there were certain prophecies within Hebrew scriptures concerning a coming messiah – the authors of Matthew and Luke presented stories about the birth of Jesus to help him “more properly fit the part” of an important spiritual figure. Most progressive Christians accept that the mid-winter timing of Christmas was strategically chosen to co-opt and supplant the rivaling pagan celebrations of Saturnalia, Solstice, and Yule. We know that the season of Advent was created to provide a “winter Lent.” And most progressive Christians know that for the first few centuries of the faith the early Christians didn’t celebrate Jesus’ birth at all – celebrating the Resurrection (aka “Easter” – a whole ‘nother matter) was the main event and chief holy day in the Christian world.

“Knowing” all of this … how on earth can we, with any integrity whatsoever, celebrate Christmas at all?

To be sure, Christmas is a muddied amalgam of Judeo-Christian myths wedded to certain pagan holiday traditions from ancient Rome, proto-European countries. Western Christians tend to focus on Christmas as a celebration of the birth of the Christ – “the anointed one, the chosen one, the messiah.” Christians often conflate these terms with, Lord, Immanuel (“God with us”), Son of God, and savior as well. Many progressive Christians have come to be a bit allergic to several of those terms and titles for Jesus – instead favoring more modest and less exclusive titles such as “teacher, master, rabbi, prophet, holy man, holy one,” etc. I suppose we do this in part to shed the patriarchal and medieval aspects of the faith that seem archaic, antiquated, obsolete, and even offensive. Some of us do so because we reject the literalist interpretations of those terms that many fundamentalists and conservative Christians have in mind when they wield those terms. Indeed, many progressive Christians reject the notions that Jesus was God literally incarnate in Jesus; or that Jesus was literally “God with us”; or that he is literally “God.”

There are sound scriptural reasons for this perspective. Jesus never overtly states that he is God in any of the Gospels – not even in John. In the synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) Jesus makes a point to distance himself from being associated or confused with God (“No one is good but God alone” Mark 10:18, Luke 18:19). When teaching about the end of the earth/worldly empires, Jesus said, *“No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels.. nor the Son, but only the Father” (*Matthew 24:36). Jesus told Mary Magdalene, “I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God” (John 20:17). Jesus prayed to God – not to himself, e.g. Mark 14:35-36). Whoever wrote Timothy didn’t think Jesus was God as he wrote, “For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Timothy 2:5). And Jesus, at least in Mark, primarily refers to himself as the Anthropos – “the human one” (often translated as “son of man”).

Okay so Jesus isn’t literally God, he wasn’t God in the flesh – at least not any more than you or I are (which isn’t a small thing). I, however, would like to invite us to not be quite so quick to jettison all of these terms, titles, and references for Jesus – Joshua/Yeshua bin Joseph of Nazareth. It is possible to embrace those titles and mean them metaphorically, to embrace them as the poetic language of devotion that they actually are – and, I’d say were originally intended to be (along with the late Marcus Borg before me). We can embrace a metaphorical “Jesus is all of God that can fit into human form” perspective. And we can even pray to Jesus knowing that’s a small idolatry and that neither Jesus nor God frankly care that much about such trivialities. God no doubt, metaphorically, smiles when people pray to Jesus instead of to Her. What matters is that we’re connecting.

Similarly, certain progressive Christians have difficulty and even some allergy to referring to themselves as “Christians” – “..some progressive Christians prefer to call themselves ‘followers of the Way of Jesus’ instead of ‘Christians.’ It helps keep the focus on what they think Jesus intended — off of Him and more on the Way and the God he was seeking to invite people to experience and follow.” – p. 55, Kissing Fish. I can appreciate that, yet I actually prefer to call myself a “Christian” as I’m seeking to reclaim that word, and Christianity, from the fundamentalists and conservative evangelicals who’ve effectively hijacked those words for the past 40 years. And many progressive Christians are with me. Thank God for the adjective.

I think this same insight is help helpful for approaching Christmas. Instead of rejecting the celebration or minimizing it – we can reinterpret it and still celebrate it fully and with gusto. Look, we don’t have to believe that God “sent Jesus to the world as God’s-self to experience a human life, in order to be killed by us in order to save us” to appreciate Christmas. We don’t have to believe that Jesus was somehow literally Immanuel – God with us – in a way that we aren’t, in order to be joyous about how Jesus showed us how to value that of God, the divinity within each of us. We don’t have to believe he was literally born of a virgin, or that his parents took some sort of rather preposterous journey to Bethlehem to engage in some sort of unhistorical census in order to appreciate that he was born to a peasant family in the far eastern sticks of the Roman empire in a lowly state – to joyously celebrate how God works in surprising ways from the margins to defy the oppressive powers the world. We can know that December 25 was a capriciously (though intentionally) assigned date for Jesus’ birth intentionally chosen to rival and supplant pagan mid-winter holidays and still wish Jesus a happy Birthday and sing hymns and carols with vigor –without taking the lyrics literally.

We can still claim Jesus as Lord in a meaningful way – in the subversive spirit of speaking truth to power which poetically asserts that a crucified peasant from the sticks is Lord – and that the Roman Emperor, or any other worldly leader – isn’t. It’s more a defiant social protest than a declaration of ontological fact. God isn’t really here to “Lord it over us”, but rather to Love us. That is part of the Christian Gospel.

A progressive Christian re-telling of the birth of Jesus might look like this:

“In 6-4 BCE, Yeshua of Nazareth was born into a humble, peasant family, in a tiny town, in the backwater hinterlands of the Palestine territory on the eastern edge of the Roman Empire. It doesn’t really matter if Jesus was born to an actual virgin or not – or even if he was born in Bethlehem for that matter. The point is moot. Either way, he grew up to be our savior. In fact, if Jesus wasn’t born to a virgin, being born as a bastard to an unmarried teen-aged peasant girl from the sticks on the far fringes of the roman Empire would have only further highlighted God’s amazing and empowering ways.” – p. 109*, Kissing Fish*

So let’s deck the halls, trim the trees, set out the nativity set/crèche, sing the songs, drink the nog, and give the gifts in honor of the one who inspires us to grow in God.

advent essence

it isn’t about waiting for baby Jesus to be born again
swaddled in a sty

and it isn’t about waiting for Christ to return again
from a cloud in the sky

it’s about us deepening into God’s kingdom
– liberated life for you and i

Merry Christmas brothers and sisters!

XX- Roger

This is an edited version of an essay was written on Nov. 29, and first appeared on Progressing Spirit on Dec. 6, 2018.

Rev. Roger Wolsey is an ordained United Methodist pastor who directs the Wesley Foundation at the University of Colorado at Boulder, and is author of Kissing Fish: christianity for people who don’t like christianity

Click here for the Kissing Fish Facebook page

progressive Christian

progressive christianity

Virgin

Wolsey

Previous Post

December 20, 2018

Good Grief. What men need.

Next Post

January 7, 2019 Mysticism, Carmel, and the Holy Land.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month May 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 October 2022 June 2022 December 2021 September 2021 August 2021 April 2021 March 2021 September 2020 August 2020 March 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 March 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 September 2017 May 2017 February 2017 January 2017 October 2016 August 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 November 2015 September 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 October 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 July 2013 April 2013 March 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does 1 Peter say believers are being built into?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A holy nation Living stones God's temple A spiritual house