Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Speaking of Unity: Chapter 2 of That We May Be One

Speaking of Unity: Chapter 2 of That We May Be One

Last updated on: March 22, 2026 at 4:13 pm by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

Speaking of Unity: Chapter 2 of That We May Be One 2026-03-22T16:13:50-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here I continue discussion of the book That We May Be One: Practicing Unity in a Divided Church by Church of God minister Gary B. Agee. Everyone is invited to participated this time, but be sure to follow the rules stated at the end here.

I fail to find a single, clear definition of “unity” in the chapter entitled Speaking of Unity. The first section is headlined “Unity Defined,” but what I find there is a description of unity. In one long sentence Gary writes “Where unity is encouraged, a spirit of comaraderie and connectedness binds together individuals on opposite sides of contentious moral issues as well as those of different races, class groups, ethnicities, gender communities, political affiliations, age groups, and sexual orientations.” (35) A few sentences later, on the same page he writes “Sometimes separation is necessary for the integrity of a cause [but] the commitment to unity puts it off until absolutely necessary.” Near the end of the chapter he writes “God’s kingdom knows no borders or boundaries.” (42)

With Gary, I am a strong believer in Christian unity, but I worry that he and I disagree about the depth and breadth of unity among people who call themselves “Christian.” In private communication Gary tells me that by “we” in the title of his book he means God’s kingdom people. That we can agree on. IF “we” and “kingdom people” means true Christians, then I am with him all the way. However…

I suspect that the devil in the details has to do with when and under what circumstances separation both within and outside of God’s kingdom is necessary.

My very broad experiences of “rubbing shoulders” with people who might be Christians, who certainly think they are Christians, tells me that very often separation in terms of Christian fellowship is necessary. I’m not talking about a schism among Amish over whether to wear buttons or hooks. I’m talking about clear deviations from the true gospel, bordering on, leaning into, a false gospel.

I have learned to have Christian fellowship with non-Trinitarian Christians who simply misunderstand the Trinity and are confused about it. But I cannot have Christian fellowship with anyone who denies the deity of Jesus Christ. I don’t know what Gary would say. I hope he would say, yes, that is a case of necessary separation. But so far I am left wondering.

There are even less extreme (in terms of doctrine) necessary separations. I belonged to an evangelical Baptist church that fell into unethical behavior towards its ministerial staff. After struggling to help the church get it right, when the behavior got worse, even to the point of being abusive, I had to leave the church. I had been a faithful member for eight years.

On the other hand, I believe all Christians should strive to answer, with God’s help, Jesus’s prayer that we should be one. I start with open communion. I believe closed communion is the sin of sectarianism. I go on to believe that Christian churches should cooperate with each other and even look for opportunities to unite.

I celebrate the “Memphis Miracle” where, in the 1990s, the Pentecostal Fellowship of North America (PFNA) voluntarily dissolved itself while simultaneously asking the predominantly Black Church of God in Christ, the oldest Pentecostal denomination in America, to form a new fellowship of Pentecostals. The PFNA people strongly implied that they would like to be invited into the new fellowship. A new racially inclusive multi-denominational fellowship of Pentecostal and charismatic churches was formed and still exists.

The reason the PFNA dissolved is that my uncle, then president of one Pentecostal denomination and on the national board of the PFNA, discovered in the archives that when the PFNA was founded in the 1940s it consciously excluded Black denominations and churches. He and other Pentecostal leaders decided that it was not enough to reform the PFNA. Since it was founded in racism, it needed to be dissolved.

I celebrated denominational unions and reunions. I look forward to the day when Catholics and Protestants can enjoy full Christian fellowship around the Lord’s Table. Until then, I invite Catholics and others who practice closed communion to join me at the table in my church.

Having said all that, I must add that I am not entirely comfortable with the seemingly very broad “tent” that Gary describes.

Although he has not said anything (yet) about Latter Day Saints/Mormons, I will use The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints as my example. I have been to Brigham Young University for inter religious dialogue events three times. There I met very nice people and observed a very nice campus. However, due to our very deep and serious doctrinal differences, I could not have Christian fellowship with them. I ate with them and conversed with them and enjoyed their company. But I cannot participate in a Latter Day Saints worship service or prayer meeting. And if a Latter Day Saint man or woman wanted to join my church I would have to ask him or her to renounce Mormonism and embrace the gospel including monotheism, the forever deity of Jesus Christ (viz., that he did not become divine and was never Lucifer’s “brother”) and some other key doctrines of Christian orthodoxy. Having said all of that, I insist that I am not judging Latter Day Saints’ salvation. I am defending the integrity of the gospel.

*Note: If you choose to comment, make sure your comment is relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 18, 2026

Two Anglicanisms and Two Pentecostalisms

Next Post

March 25, 2026 A New Religious Left In America?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"No doubt Lewis was inspired by earlier thinkers. Ironically (or perhaps serendipitously) I am now ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"I am sure Lewis would agree. After all, as a Christian he believed in original ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"If I’m not mistaken, the quote from Lewis is his interpretation of the “Conditioners’” own ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"Thank you! It's been a great re-read of a thought provoking, but somewhat dense, little ..."

Øyvind J. Karstad

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, what is the correct sequence of events in the End Times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, false prophet rises from earth, mark of the beast given False prophet rises, dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, mark of the beast given Mark of the beast given, dragon cast to earth, beast rises, false prophet rises Beast rises from sea, dragon cast to earth, mark of the beast given, false prophet rises