Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
What Kind of Christian Are You?

What Kind of Christian Are You?

Last updated on: February 25, 2026 at 4:00 pm by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

What Kind of Christian Are You? 2026-02-25T16:00:47-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When asked what kind of Christian you are, most people would name a denomination. Or, at least that’s the way it was. “Catholic,” “Orthodox,” “Lutheran,” “Presbyterian,” “Baptist,” etc. That’s not the kind of answer sought here. I’m going back to a very strong custom among especially conservative, evangelical Christians in the US when I was growing up.

My parents were Pentecostals. My father was a Pentecostal pastor for 53 years. He pastored only two churches during that time. Many of my relatives were Pentecostal missionaries, denominational leaders, evangelists. Many of my relatives who were not Pentecostal were: Christian Reformed or Church of God (Anderson, Indiana). Large family reunions were interesting because they often included theological debates.

But everyone I knew in this hothouse Christian world shared this way of identifying people who claimed to be Christian: False Christian, Nominal Christian, Carnal Christian, Real Christian. Everyone we knew who claimed to be Christian fell into one of these categories.

Now, let me be clear so as to set aside some objections right away. We saw this as a spectrum and not as a set of absolute categories. Picture a spectrum-line. This one did not have vertical lines dissecting it. It had shades between the sectors. Some people who claimed to be Christian were identified as “well, sort of, you know…” or “moving in the direction of being.”

So, now, what the categories meant and, I would say, still mean. “False Christian” was someone who claimed to be Christian but most certainly was not. Some of us then and now would not judge their salvation; we were judging their commitment to the Way of Jesus Christ—as we understood it. A false Christian was someone who claimed to be a Christian but just couldn’t really be—given what they believed and/or how they lived.

”Nominal Christian” was someone who claimed to be Christian and mostly believed the right things but didn’t show any real commitment to the Way of Jesus Christ. They lacked any evidence of being a committed follower of Jesus Christ. “Nominal Christian” meant “in name only” or “in name mostly” but not quite there.

False Christians abounded in what we considered “cults” and liberal churches. Nominal Christians abounded in “mainline churches.” But there were also some merely nominal Christians among us, mostly spouses of real Christians who came with their spouses on special Sundays.

”Carnal Christians” were people we identified as truly Christian but whose lifestyles “pushed the envelope” of what we considered acceptable for followers of Jesus Christ in this broken, sinful world. They drank alcoholic beverages, sometimes got drunk, smoked tobacco, watched bad movies or frequently attended movies in theaters, had lots of non-Christian friends they didn’t seem interested in getting converted, etc., etc. Our churches included many carnal Christians; they just couldn’t teach or serve as deacons or elders. They were considered “saved” but just barely.

”Real Christians” were us, of course. Well, by “us” we meant those of us committed to living the Way of Jesus Christ and who believed the right things. We didn’t consider anyone, ourselves included, perfect, but we believed real Christians studied the Bible, had “daily devotions,” a prayer life, talked about Jesus as if they knew him as a personal friend, had a “testimony” of conversion, attended church joyfully, didn’t dance, go to movies, drink or smoke.

Now, to keep this from getting too long, let me ask whether you think this general way of categorizing people who claim to be Christian still has any validity and proper use? Strip away the legalism of the church of my upbringing. Are there still, among people who claim to be “Christian,” false Christians, nominal Christians, carnal Christians, and real Christians? I’m not asking if anyone can absolutely and in an authoritative way SAY who belongs in which category but whether the categories have some validity?

I’ll finish with a story. I used to belong to a mostly Christian theological society. Members had to have a doctoral degree in theology or a cognate discipline. They had to have published at least one book in theology. We met at various colleges, universities, seminaries around a major metropolitan area in the Midwest. The members represented many denominations. A few people of the Jewish faith attended but I don’t recall any ever serving as an officer. It was historically a group of Christian theologians. We met to read our own scholarly papers to each other and engage in discussions about them. Everyone was cordial even in strong disagreements.

As I attended and even served as president of the society I found myself falling back in my own mind on those categories named and described above. Which theologians were false Christians, nominal Christians, carnal Christians, real Christians? One theologian claimed to be Christian but was Unitarian. I thought of him as a false Christian. I had many one-on-one conversations with him. Another theologian was a Lutheran who showed real signs of embracing the orthodox, historic faith, but he drank heavily to the point of getting drunk at meetings. (Some were held in institutions that served alcoholic drinks. I saw this theologian get drunk during the afternoon break. He confronted a Catholic theologian and called him names and swore at him.) Another theologian was evangelical but widely believed to be sexually promiscuous. Later that suspicion was confirmed. Possibly a carnal Christian? Was he in the grip of a sexual addiction? Anyway, that’s how I tended to view him. Finally, there was Donald Bloesch, a theologian I considered a real Christian.

*Note: If you choose to comment, keep it relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 21, 2026

Is Calvinism A Heresy?

Next Post

February 28, 2026 Controversies About Evangelical Christian Universities

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"“Secular” means non-religious. No religion is embraced by American society anymore. Christianity remains the leading ..."

Roger Olson

Billy Graham’s Successor?

"I will look him up. Never heard of him."

Roger Olson

Billy Graham’s Successor?

"Where and when and how did I “support” a leader or church…? I said I ..."

Roger Olson

I’m Proud of Adam Hamilton (and ..."

"4-5% of the population is atheist or literally 'secular' not the entire country.Thats a really ..."

davidt

Billy Graham’s Successor?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

The righteous person will live by what quality or characteristic?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Holiness Obedience Works Faith