Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Why I Am An Evangelical Arminian: Part 1: Truth

Why I Am An Evangelical Arminian: Part 1: Truth

Last updated on: September 9, 2025 at 3:05 pm by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

Why I Am An Evangelical Arminian: Part 1: Truth 2025-09-09T15:05:44-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

*Here begins a series of essays about “Why I am an ‘Evangelical Arminian Christian’.” I begin at the beginning—with my fundamental principles of thought. These essays will appear every few days over the next few weeks.*

1) My First Principle: Authority is Truth (over Status) (by Roger E. Olson)

Philosopher/theologian Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772-1834) quipped that “He who begins by loving Christianity more than Truth, will proceed by loving his sect or church better than Christianity, and end in loving himself better than all.” Even committed Christians must place truth above every other commitment. Of course, when handling truth, a Christian, following Jesus and recognizing his or her own finitude and fallenness, must handle it with love and humility.

Unfortunately, truth is often subordinated to status—even among Christians. Here “status” means “position of privilege and/or authority.” That might be an office or a custom (among other things).

Without love of and commitment to truth we are lost in the plays of power.

Of course, someone will be asking “What is ‘truth’?” That is a distinct, if not separate, question. Some will not think so, but I do. Above all I believe truth is; it is not merely a chimera. And, along with that, I believe some approximation of knowledge to truth is possible, however rare and difficult to measure.

The search for truth is never ending, but over it all should reign commitment to it.

What that means, in practical terms, is this: Once I believe I have grasped a truth I should believe it and adjust my life to it. I should not suppress it or deny it. Nor should I hide it—except out of love when revealing it would be more harmful to persons than keeping it to myself.

But here is the more important practical point: when truth matters, and it should be revealed, it trumps all other authorities.

I am a teacher; I teach students. In some senses, in some situations, I have “official authority” over my students. However, if a student has truth on his or her side I ought to submit to it, acknowledge it, adjust myself to it. My authority of status is a lesser authority than truth.

Many may agree with me up to this point but hesitate or even object when I say that truth should trump everything except love. Love should govern the expression of truth but not the acknowledgment of truth. So, in a sense, even love is trumped by truth.

Truth is what is the case. A belief is true insofar as it corresponds with reality. That is the whole point of epistemology of whatever variety: to decide what is real by whatever means are possible and available.

Once the search for and commitment to truth as reality is surrendered, power trumps everything.

Unfortunately, a common human habit is to establish authority by status rather than truth. This habit reveals itself whenever truth is suppressed by power.

My obligation, then, is to set aside my privileges of power, of status, of office, of position, of age, of experience, and adjust to truth whatever its source may be. If something is true, I have no right to suppress or deny it just because it (or my acknowledgement of it) calls my status into question.

This is why I am uncomfortable with hierarchies of all kinds. Leadership is necessary, but status of mere position, office, authority divorced from truth, is dangerous. This is well illustrated in the Bible by the story of King David and the prophet Nathan. In fact, I would argue this is the main point of the story for us, for everyone who reads or hears it. A king, a president, a parent, a professor, ought always to listen and submit to truth—whoever offers it. Unfortunately, often, those with status protect themselves from Nathans and their truth and even punish them if their truth is inconvenient.

Of course, everyone knows about and decries the notable case of Galileo and the Catholic Church of his day. Galileo proved beyond any reasonable doubt that the earth revolves around the sun—an inconvenient truth for the Catholic Church. (And Protestants were no more eager to embrace it.) Galileo was persecuted for revealing that inconvenient truth. Most people admit that the church of his day should have adjusted to it the moment it knew he was right. It did not. (Let’s not debate the details of the case.)

And yet, people with status within hierarchies continue to resist inconvenient truths, especially when they are revealed by people without status.

I believe that truth, insofar as it is known, trumps every other authority. Love should govern the manner and timing of truth’s expression, but not truth itself.

Of course, all this begs the question “What is ‘truth’?” but that is a distinct question. Before that matters we must commit ourselves to the authority of truth above status. That means the “flattening” of all hierarchies based on status rather than on leadership committed to truth.

*Note: If you choose to comment, make sure your comment is relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 7, 2025

N. T. Wright: Creation, Power, and Truth

Next Post

September 12, 2025 Charlie Kirk RIP

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"No doubt Lewis was inspired by earlier thinkers. Ironically (or perhaps serendipitously) I am now ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"I am sure Lewis would agree. After all, as a Christian he believed in original ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"If I’m not mistaken, the quote from Lewis is his interpretation of the “Conditioners’” own ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"Thank you! It's been a great re-read of a thought provoking, but somewhat dense, little ..."

Øyvind J. Karstad

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth