Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Rethinking God

Rethinking God

Last updated on: August 24, 2025 at 4:53 pm by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

Rethinking God 2025-08-24T16:53:20-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here I continue discussing the book God Who Looks Like Jesus: A Renewed Approach to Understanding God by Gregory A. Boyd and M. Scott Boren (Herald Press). Chapter 6 is Rethinking God. If you have read the chapter, feel free to comment; if not, feel free to ask a question.

Chapter 6: Rethinking God amounts to a full assault on “the classical view of God” by which Greg means the Greek philosophically-inspired view of God as immutable, impassable and pure actuality with no potentiality. Its main representative in Christian history is Thomas Aquinas, the Angelic Doctor of the Catholic Church. However, it was also promoted by Anselm of Canterbury and many others. Even some Protestant scholastics such as Francis Turretin and his disciple Charles Hodge held versions of it. It is still promoted by many evangelical theologians (among others).

Greg admits that some, perhaps many, Christian theologians have affirmed that God is also relational, something he strongly affirms. However, he says, they appeal to “unnecessary mysteries” and fall into contradiction: “God is immutable, but in some mysterious sense also is relational. God is timeless, but in some mysterious way also interactive. God is impassible, but in some mysterious manner, also suffers.” (109) He says that when we start thinking about God through Jesus, “the ‘mysteries’ of classical theism simply disappear.” (110)

Greg has often said that these metaphysical attributes of God are unnecessary and even unbiblical “metaphysical compliments” people think they must pay to God. They all stem from the presupposition that he calls “the ontology of perfection”—that a perfect being cannot change in any way whatsoever and cannot have any potential at all. The God of the Bible, however, the God of Jesus Christ, suffers and changes—not in essence or wisdom but in experience. Love changes a person. To love another, outside of oneself, is to be open to some suffering. And, the cross signifies that God can suffer. Greg rejects the old notion of classical theism that Christ only suffered “in his human nature.”

The most beautiful and homiletical paragraph is this: “The cross reveals a deeper dimension to the problem of evil. The crucifixion shows us a God who makes evil his own problem. The God who reveals himself in Jesus does not stand aloof from the pain of the world; instead, he enters into the depths of our collective hell to liberate creation from it. If evil is a problem for us, how much more must it be for a God whose capacity for love is infinite and who therefore experiences the world’s collective pain?” (114)

I agree completely with Greg (and his co-author) in this chapter. When I first learned about “classical Christian theism,” that God cannot be affected by anything outside himself, I was appalled. I was by then thoroughly familiar with scripture and embedded in a form of Christian life that believed prayer can make a difference. I believed in a relational, interactive God, not a metaphysical God of Greek philosophers (and those influenced by them). I cam across something Anselm of Canterbury said to the effect that God cannot even feel compassion. I studied Process Theology and Hegel’s philosophy of religion and rejected them as also too philosophical to fit the God of the Bible and of Jesus Christ.

Greg and I had numerous conversation about this subject and I “hear” echoes of things we both said in those conversations in this chapter (and throughout the book). If I could, I would require all students of Christian theology to read this book and especially this chapter. We need to shed once and for all at least the most rigid forms of classical theism and return to the loving, relational God of the Bible and of Jesus.

*Note: If you choose to comment, make sure your comment is relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 23, 2025

Another Step Toward Fascism in America

Next Post

August 24, 2025 Fascism: Experts and Elements

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"No doubt Lewis was inspired by earlier thinkers. Ironically (or perhaps serendipitously) I am now ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"I am sure Lewis would agree. After all, as a Christian he believed in original ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"If I’m not mistaken, the quote from Lewis is his interpretation of the “Conditioners’” own ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"Thank you! It's been a great re-read of a thought provoking, but somewhat dense, little ..."

Øyvind J. Karstad

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the name of the garden where Jesus prayed before His arrest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eden Gethsemane Bethany Golgotha