Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
David Bentley Hart’s Christology

David Bentley Hart’s Christology

Last updated on: July 21, 2025 at 6:26 am by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

David Bentley Hart’s Christology 2025-07-21T06:26:05-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have before reviewed books by theologian David Bentley Hart. Before launching into this altogether unworthy one (review), I want to thank The University of Notre Dame Press for sending me Advanced Uncorrected Page Proofs of The Light of Tabor: Toward a Monistic Christology (forthcoming, 2025).

Hart is by most accounts a very astute, erudite, creative thinker, even if, by some accounts, a controversial one. He is Christian. It has been reported that he affiliates somehow with the Eastern Orthodox tradition, but I do not know the specifics.

Now to the book. It is worth the cost in that it stretches the reader’s theological “brain muscles.” It made me think and think hard. I had to read very carefully. Hart’s prose is daunting. His sentences long. His vocabulary challenging.

Recently a friend returned from Ethiopia. She asked me about the Ethiopian Orthodox Church which she encountered there. She and I could encounter it here—in the large metropolitan area in the American Mountain Region. There are now Ethiopian Orthodox churches in virtually every American city of any size.

I explained to her that the Ethiopian Orthodox Church is, of course, a Christian church, but different in some ways from the Eastern Orthodox churches, the Roman Catholic Church, and all Protestant churches. How so? It is “miaphysitist” in its Christology. Some would call it “Monophysite.” The gist, I explained, is that Ethiopian Orthodox Christians affirm the Trinity but not Chalcedon, the hypostatic union doctrine, belief that Jesus Christ was and is one unified person possession two distinct natures, human and divine. They, together with the Coptic Orthodox Church (Egyptian) believe Jesus Christ had/has one nature, human and divine. Critics describe that as a kind of “hybrid” of the human and divine, something LIKE the fifth century Constantinopolitan monk Eutyches taught—that Jesus’s humanity was swallowed up in his deity like a drop of wine in the ocean. I’m sure Oriental Orthodox Christians would object to being lumped together with Eutyches, but they often are. More to their liking would by Cyril of Alexandria except that he reluctantly affirmed the decision of the Council of Ephesus (431).

What has that all got to do with Hart? In The Light of Tabor Hart affirms a “monistic Christology” by which he means one in which Jesus Christ was and is the chief exemplification of the eternal underlying oneness of divine and human natures or spirits. “God became human by Jesus being from the very first a man always wholly become God—which is also to say, wholly become the perfection of the human in its only natural end.” (85)

Also: “In Christ the perfect coincidence of the divine and human, or of the infinite and finite—that perfect moment of indistinction between the divine and the human that is the mystery hidden in God from the foundation of the world—is also the perfection of our humanity in our own nature. And we shall truly know that mystery only when we shall cease to be opaque to our own first source of being.” (87-88) “The ‘atman’ within us exists only in ‘Brahman.” (88)

Hart freely admits to being influenced by: Origen, Plotinus, Eckhart, and Bulgakov and of being “unapologetically Neoplatonist.” (89)

Back to Ethiopia. I have no idea if Ethiopian Orthodox theologians would agree with Hart or not. But there is some sense in which Hart’s Christology is miaphysite. But not because Christ’s humanity was swallowed up in his divinity like a drop of wine in the ocean but because he denies any ultimate duality between the divine and the human. That is clear if you read the book with care. And it goes back to his previous book You Are Gods: On Nature and Supernature (2022) which I reviewed here.

Is Hart’s metaphysic heretical? Is his Christology a heresy? Those are the questions I put to you. What say you?

*Note: If you choose to comment, make sure your comment is relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 17, 2025

Mysticism: What Is It?

Next Post

July 22, 2025 A God Who Looks Like Jesus: Introduction

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I read Daane’s book The Freedom of God and loved it. I used it in ..."

Roger Olson

Calvinism’s Achilles Heel

"Wicked people who refuse to repent."

Roger Olson

Does God Save Everyone He Can?

"The point is that IF Nineveh were destroyed immediately after its repentance, its inhabitants would ..."

Roger Olson

Does God Save Everyone He Can?

"For a person to be forgiven by God he or she need only repent truly ..."

Roger Olson

Does God Save Everyone He Can?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: 3 John commends Diotrephes for his hospitality and love for the brethren.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE