Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

rogereolson

Attributes of God: Righteousness

Last updated on: November 10, 2024 at 4:21 pm   by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

Attributes of God: Righteousness 2024-11-10T16:21:25-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Cremer, The Christian Doctrine of the Attributes of God: 2. The Righteousness of God, pp. 29-43

This is an invitation to comment for those who have read this portion of the book. Others may ask. In about one week I will comment on the second half of this portion—pp. 43-47. I am going slowly now so you can re-read as needed. I usually re-read before commenting. This section is about The Righteousness of God.

As before, with the holiness of God, Cremer rejects much of traditional Christian thought about God’s righteousness and ours. He believes and says that too much of it has focused on righteousness as the highest virtue, something he thinks derives more from Greek thought than biblical religion. He also rejects the idea that righteousness is God’s punitive justice, also something he believes derives more from Greek thought than biblical thought.

Cremer points out what he regards as the awful result of these misunderstandings of God’s righteousness: “Christianity came to be seen almost entirely as a new law.” (34) In this I find some vindication as in The Story of Christian Theology I said as much about a defection from the full gospel that began to happen in the early church after the apostles.

Cremer repeats his basic axiom about the attributes of God known only though revelation: “Righteousness, like holiness, is an attribute of God, of which one can have no idea apart from revealed religion.” (31) “For it is in showing grace that God is experienced as judge and as righteous.” (31)

Cremer insists that God’s righteousness and God’s grace and forgiveness not be separated or place in any tension. God’s righteousness is manifested precisely in his forgiving grace for the elect. And election is not based on any moral achievement; it is sheer gift.

Cremer’s biographer reports that he was an advocate of social reform. On pages 38-39 he delves into the OT prophets and preaches that their idea of God’s righteousness was his defense and deliverance of the afflicted and oppressed. On page 40 he asks “How can a sinner be righteous?”

Then things get complicated. So, here, I will summarize what I understand Cremer’s answer to be. First, a person or group is righteous when he is/she is/they “who by their conduct rebuke the injustice of others, and so provoke violence against themselves.” (40-41) Also, “He is righteous who has received justice.” (41) How does one receive justice? Only from God through election. “In its election, and not in its conduct, Israel has an indisputably righteous cause, against which no one can rise up, for who wants to dispute with YHWH?” (42) Righteousness is “not moral faultlessness but holding fast to God.” (42-43)

The “upshot” seems to be that God’s righteousness resides precisely in his electing and forgiving grace and all that it entails.

Does Cremer’s emphasis on election mean that people are not responsible for their own salvation? He says not: “We are responsible for the state of our own salvation.” (30) Election, then, does not mean automatic salvation; it means God’s choice to save. Who, then, is elect? So far, Cremer does not answer that, except “Israel.” But it is fair to say that he does not mean that every Israelite is saved simply by election of the people and nothing else.

Brunner had the answer to this. To be elect is to believe in the God of election, to trust in him. Barth argued that all people are elect, but he acknowledged that the status of “elect” can be rejected if not lost.

The achievement of this part of a chapter is that Cremer separates “righteousness” from “moral perfection” even in God (although he does not deny God’s moral perfection). God is righteous in his election, judgment, grace, and salvation, apart from the moral law. This is what God can do and in doing it he reveals his unique righteousness to all.

*Note: If you choose to comment, make sure you have read these pages. If not, you may ask a question. In any case, keep your comment relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post



November 9, 2024

Mystery, Paradox, Contradiction in Theology 2

Next Post



November 13, 2024 Why "Panentheism" Is False

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"No doubt Lewis was inspired by earlier thinkers. Ironically (or perhaps serendipitously) I am now ..."

Roger Olson


The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"I am sure Lewis would agree. After all, as a Christian he believed in original ..."

Roger Olson


The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"If I’m not mistaken, the quote from Lewis is his interpretation of the “Conditioners’” own ..."

Roger Olson


The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"Thank you! It's been a great re-read of a thought provoking, but somewhat dense, little ..."

Øyvind J. Karstad


The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth

Related posts from Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: The Abolition...

Roger E. Olson

Family

She Survived Her Execution. Should the State Try...

Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man Part 2: Chapter 2:...

Roger E. Olson

Family

Ambiguity without Ambivalence in Faith

Roger E. Olson

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

The British Museum-- Part Two

I was strolling through the top floor of the brand new Parthenon...

What Does Gêvâh Mean For Kimberley Guifoyle &...

This week, a lot of the news is focused on Kimberly Guilfoyle....

INNER CIRCLE: Profound Mystery (Of Christ In All...

Ephesians 5:31-32 “For this reason, a man will leave his father and...

Do Not Rejoice When Your Enemy Falls: The...

Turning an execution into a public spectacle is a disturbing expression of...

'The Chosen' S6 Trailer: The Passion Gets Very...

Not many watching 'The Chosen' worry about spoilers, but just because they...

The purpose-driven labor priest

A labor activist reads Rick Warren and it gets me wondering about...

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube