Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
What Is a “Form of Life?” Can an Outsider Understand?

What Is a “Form of Life?” Can an Outsider Understand?

Last updated on: October 24, 2024 at 4:13 pm by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

What Is a “Form of Life?” Can an Outsider Understand? 2024-10-24T16:13:43-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What Is a “Form of Life?” Can an Outsider Understand One?

Some years ago two of my colleagues came to me asking if I could explain what “pleading the blood of Jesus” meant. I was stumped. I knew very well what it means to Pentecostal (and perhaps other) Christians because I grew up with it. I knew and explained when and why it was done, why and when my parents, for example, “pled the blood of Jesus.” But I had trouble expressing the practice to anyone who isn’t part of the form of life where that takes place.

Years ago I went through a “Wittgensteinian phase” where I was fascinated by that philosopher’s idea of “language games.” According to him, and I know I am over-simplifying here, words only have meaning within language games and language games are tied to “forms of life.” Wittgenstein was reacting to positivism, especially that of A. J. Ayer.

Two Wittgensteinians caught my attention, partly because I grew up in a form of life whose language is pretty much inexplicable to non-participants, to outsiders. Some people are attracting to Pentecostalism because of the mystique of its form of life, because of their, to use Harvey Cox’s language, “ecstasy deficit.”

One was theologian D. Z. Phillips of Wales. The other was philosopher-sociologist-anthropologist Peter Winch (pictured above). According to both, outsiders to a language game cannot really understanding it or the form of life to which it is attached. That sounded like relativism, but it wasn’t. They were not denying objective reality; they were talking about the fact that we are all participants in a form of life or more than one and that our everyday language and even ways of seeing reality are shaped by it/them. “There is no view from nowhere.”

According to Winch, in order to understand a form of life, a distinct micro-culture, one has to participate in it or have participated in it. You cannot be a complete outsider and understand it. Winch went further than Clifford Geertz, another anthropologist who was influenced by Wittgenstein.

I was preconditioned to agree with Winch because every time I met someone who was not Pentecostal and had never been Pentecostal, who attempted to describe it, I knew they were wrong. Oh, they may have known some facts about Pentecostalism, but they had no idea what those facts really meant.

I have seen many attempts to portray something of Pentecostalism on television and in movies and have never felt there was any authenticity in them until I saw “The Apostle” starring Robert Duvall. Then I found out that he was taken to Pentecostal services of worship, revivals, by a woman, either his grandmother or a child “sitter,” when he was small. He knew it from the inside. I did detect other actors in the movie who I could tell were either just acting or were Pentecostals themselves. It was obvious to me.

Pentecostals and some others (e.g., some Black Baptists) “plead the blood of Jesus” over a vehicle of any kind before the travel in it. Or before some others travel. It’s meant to “cover” the vehicle and the driver and the occupants and protect them from danger. But what it means to the people pleading Jesus’s blood cannot really be put into words outsiders would understand. It’s understood by insiders as a mystery. They believe it may work. They hope it does. Outsiders no doubt often think of it as magic.

I will go deeper into the mystique of Pentecostalism, at least as it was in the U.S. and probably still is in many places in the world. The deep “logic” of Pentecostalism is an experience that can’t be described. It can only be felt. It’s a profound connection with God but even “connection” is not a word often used. It’s a feeling without words to describe it. It can be provoked by a fervent prayer, by speaking in tongues, by a powerful sermon, by a hymn or gospel song, by…many things.

I still feel something of it myself when I listen to Pentecostal songs on Youtube. “Every time I feel the Spirit, moving in my heart, I will pray….” That’s a Black spiritual that white Pentecostals sang in “my day.” Pentecostal musician Ralph Carmichael re-arranged it in many ways. Whenever I want to be “transported” back into something, however slight, of my Pentecostal upbringing I go to Youtube and look for Pentecostal songs. I can’t exactly describe the feeling, but Pentecostals know it. Maybe some others know it, especially Nazarenes and other Wesleyans.

When I left Pentecostalism and became Baptist I enjoyed a greater degree of freedom of thought. (I was never a fundamentalist Baptist.) But rarely among Baptists (and here I exclude Black Baptists—from what I am about to say about Baptists in general) did I or do I feel anything like what I felt when I was Pentecostal.

Now, having said all of that, I have to also say that when I was Pentecostal and even afterward, for example when I taught theology at Oral Roberts University in the 1980s, I saw and heard a lot of false feelings, false because manufactured, manipulated. By having grown up in the thick of classical Pentecostalism I developed what I believe to be a relatively reliable discernment of the difference. For example, when I attended a healing meeting by evangelist Kathryn Kuhlman I most definitely felt something and so did others, even some pastors who said they would resist it. I don’t know how to describe it. “Better felt than telt.” But when I attended a similar healing meeting by an well-known and self-identified successor to Kuhlman all I felt was disgust. The difference was manipulation of feelings.

My point here is that we should all be very careful about criticizing a form of life just because we don’t understand it. And we should not think we can understand it if we have never really participated in it from the inside. That doesn’t mean every form of life gets a “pass,” so to speak, from ethical criticism. But it means we ought to be very careful about ridiculing a form of life we don’t really understand because we haven’t participated in it.

*If you decide to comment, make sure your comment is relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 23, 2024

Trump on Hitler

Next Post

October 27, 2024 The Christian Doctrine of the Divine Attributes 2

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"“Secular” means non-religious. No religion is embraced by American society anymore. Christianity remains the leading ..."

Roger Olson

Billy Graham’s Successor?

"I will look him up. Never heard of him."

Roger Olson

Billy Graham’s Successor?

"Where and when and how did I “support” a leader or church…? I said I ..."

Roger Olson

I’m Proud of Adam Hamilton (and ..."

"4-5% of the population is atheist or literally 'secular' not the entire country.Thats a really ..."

davidt

Billy Graham’s Successor?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who carried Jesus' cross partway to Golgotha?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter James Simon of Cyrene A Roman centurion