Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Can Anything Be Religion?

Can Anything Be Religion?

Last updated on: May 22, 2024 at 9:09 am by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

Can Anything Be Religion? 2024-05-22T09:09:39-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here, this time, I take off my Christian theologian’s hat and wear only my religion scholar hat. I hold three degrees in religious studies, two from a major secular research university (Rice, Houston, Texas). I have been involved in various program units of the American Academy of Religion including one that focuses on new and alternative religions especially in America. I have conducted non-sectarian research into new and alternative religions, presented scholarly papers at professional societies of religion scholars and published some of them in non-sectarian, secular volumes such as one about new religions published by SUNY (State University of New York) Press.

Here is the problem. In America today, as elsewhere, new religions are constantly popping up, claiming to be religious for tax purposes. Some countries have established panels of religion scholars to advise governments about which ones are truly religious and which ones only claim to be religious in order to gain tax exempt status.

This is what we need in the U.S.—a government-recognized panel of scholars with Ph.D.s in religious studies from accredited universities—to advise government entities and courts about new “churches” and religious groups and organizations as to whether they count as truly religious or whether they were organized primarily to gain tax advantages.

Such a panel would be put together from applicants and nominees by attorneys general of the country and states. The members would use objective criteria which they learned in their graduate studies in religion. There are such objective criteria. Too few people know that religious studies or studies of religion is a recognized scholarly discipline and that many U.S. (and other) universities offer graduate degrees in it.

One credential I would insist on for members of such a advisory panel would be a Ph.D from an accredited research university. Another one would be a reputation of being able to “bracket out” his or her own religious or non-religious commitments and be objective in describing and interpreting religions other than his or her own.

In my plan, this panel would be consulted whenever a new church or religion, one not yet granted tax except status, applies for tax except status as a religion. With today’s technologies (e.g., Zoom) the members would not have to come together physically in order to consult about the application and advise.

This process would only come into play when a church or other “religious” group or organization does not already belong to a denomination (broadly defined) or other formal network that has tax exempt status.

Why this proposal? Well, I could get into trouble for giving case studies. And that is the reason my proposal includes that the members of the panel could not be sued. Many religious organizations will sue anyone who publicly claims they are a cult or non-religious. I am well-aware of many groups including self-identified “churches” that seek tax exempt status that are, in my scholarly opinion, not religious at all. There is good evidence that they were established AS RELIGIOUS primarily for the purpose of gaining tax exempt status. In some cases they already existed and THEN claimed to be a church or a religion and there is good evidence that claim was ONLY in order to gain tax exempt status. Many countries have recognized this about some of them and denied them privileges that ordinarily come with being recognized as a religious organization.

These include what I call “invented religions.” They are numerous. The mark of such is that there is absolutely no evidence of the existence of the “religion” before one individual (or perhaps a small group) got together and created it for purposes such as money, the enrichment of the founder(s) or the “enjoyment” of the use of a drug in a communal setting. Across America “churches” are popping up that focus on members gathering to experience the “high” brought about by using a particular drug. Some “religious” groups are organizing for no other reason than to protest other religious groups.

I know that some of you will ask about the aforementioned objective critic for recognizing a group, church, temple, whatever, as legitimately religious. Well, there had better be or else, given the state of culture today, anything could be recognized as religious for tax purposes. And, that is already happening. Government leaders, decision-makers, and judges have no idea how to decide whether a group is or is not legitimately religious. But trained, educated religion scholars do.

One religion scholar who educated me about this was (through his writings) the University of Chicago religion scholar Mircea Eliade. I cite him as only one example. There are many others who have written about (for example) “patterns in religions.” Virtually all students of religious studies will have either studied or been indirectly taught Eliade’s ideas about what constitutes “religion.”

I don’t expect my proposal to be implemented and that because we are in a cultural situation, in the West generally, where anything goes. How could the founding fathers of America ever anticipated a court requiring a state to allow an occult group to put up an image of an occult being (almost universally believed to be the embodiment of evil) in the capitol building? Especially when leading members of the group have publicly (here, for example) stated they do not even believe in that being? Simply put, this situation of “new and alternative religions” gaining government recognition and privileges has gotten out of hand with any and every group claiming to be a religion or religious gaining government recognition as such. They can always find some judge who will throw up his or her hands and say “Who can say what counts as ‘religion’?” Well, we can. Those of us who spent years gaining terminal degrees in religious studies in major American (and other) universities!

*Note: If you choose to comment, make sure your comment is relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 20, 2024

The Political Meaning of Christianity: Relevance to MAGA

Next Post

May 24, 2024 Nazi Otto Ohlendorf and the Old Testament

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"No doubt Lewis was inspired by earlier thinkers. Ironically (or perhaps serendipitously) I am now ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"I am sure Lewis would agree. After all, as a Christian he believed in original ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"If I’m not mistaken, the quote from Lewis is his interpretation of the “Conditioners’” own ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"Thank you! It's been a great re-read of a thought provoking, but somewhat dense, little ..."

Øyvind J. Karstad

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, what is the correct sequence of events in the End Times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, false prophet rises from earth, mark of the beast given False prophet rises, dragon cast to earth, beast rises from sea, mark of the beast given Mark of the beast given, dragon cast to earth, beast rises, false prophet rises Beast rises from sea, dragon cast to earth, mark of the beast given, false prophet rises