Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
The Political Meaning of Christianity: Chapter Two…

The Political Meaning of Christianity: Chapter Two…

Last updated on: March 10, 2024 at 9:08 am by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

The Political Meaning of Christianity: Chapter Two… 2024-03-10T09:08:45-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Political Meaning of Christianity: Chapter Two: Prophetic Hope: Community and Society and The Ideal of the Just Society: pp. 53-68

In the part of Chapter Two entitled “Community and Society” Tinder pushes a distinction, if not a conflict, between “community” and “society.” Community, he argues, is compatible with the exalted individual while society is not. Societies are necessary because of our fallenness, but they debase individuals. Community enhances individual dignity. He also argues or clarifies that his exalted individual ideal is not the same as individualism.

Here is the key paragraph of this chapter part: “The political meaning of Christianity, then, does not lie in the ideal of a Christian society, for no such society can exist. Christianity calls for agape and agape for community—the unity of individuals in their exaltation. Society is the unity of human beings in subjection to one another and to the worldly necessities underlying custom, law, and governance. The terms Christian and society cannot logically be joined.” (61)

In the next section, “The Ideal of the Just Society,” Tinder argues that a perfectly just society is not a feasible human project. The key paragraph is: “It seems that the phrase ‘just society,’ as common and apparently unchallengeable as it is, does not represent a coherent and practicable ideal. The term just comprises discordant standards or else comes into conflict with different, but no less compelling, standards; the term society designates a source of practical necessities incompatible with justice. Christianity leads to this conclusion by affirming the simultaneous exaltation and fallenness of every individual. Our self-contradictory nature gives rise to conflicting imperatives.” (63)

According to Tinder, the political meaning of Christianity is not an answer to how to create the ideal society but how to hold ourselves available for community in the midst of society. (68)

Clearly, Tinder is a pessimist. Or perhaps better labeled a realist. His account of Christian social ethics is similar to, if not identical with, that of Reinhold Niebuhr who was a notorious pessimist (or realist). I might argue that a society can approximate community—at least to a greater extent than either Tinder or Niebuhr thought. Paul Tillich talked about a “theonomous society” as one that is open to the depths of human potential and to the transcendent ground of that potential. What would that look like? Has it ever existed in history or is it a purely eschatological ideal? I don’t know, but I think it’s worth striving for. Niebuhr talked about the “relevance of an impossible ideal” and perhaps Tinder would say the impossible ideal is, for him, true community, not the perfectly just society. But isn’t his rejection of a perfectly just society dependent on the meaning of “just?” I think so. He regards justice as fraught with conflicts between standards such as rehabilitation and retribution. But what if rehabilitation (of criminals) could replace retribution? There are places on earth where that is regarded as a real possibility and where the penal systems do adhere to it as that.

In any case, it seems to me that a just society is an ideal not to be dismissed. So is a Christian society as one where Christianity is the “glue” that holds things and people together. Just because that has never happened in history does not mean it cannot ever happen in history. I would admit, however, that a society organized according to agape love (a la Rauschenbusch) is impossible within human history. So much depends on the meanings of words and concepts. Overall I agree with Tinder more than I disagree.

*Note: If you choose to comment, make sure you read the relevant passages of the book. If not, you may ask a question or questions. In any case, make sure your comment or question is less than 100 words, on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful, not hostile or argumentative, and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

March 7, 2024

Generational Curses?

Next Post

March 12, 2024 Christian Zionism Gone Crazy

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"“Secular” means non-religious. No religion is embraced by American society anymore. Christianity remains the leading ..."

Roger Olson

Billy Graham’s Successor?

"I will look him up. Never heard of him."

Roger Olson

Billy Graham’s Successor?

"Where and when and how did I “support” a leader or church…? I said I ..."

Roger Olson

I’m Proud of Adam Hamilton (and ..."

"4-5% of the population is atheist or literally 'secular' not the entire country.Thats a really ..."

davidt

Billy Graham’s Successor?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the collective name of the stories Jesus told?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalms Miracles Gospel Parables