Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Are American Evangelicals Gullible?

Are American Evangelicals Gullible?

Last updated on: February 7, 2024 at 8:23 am by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

Are American Evangelicals Gullible? 2024-02-07T08:23:59-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This question has been bothering me for decades. And for what I consider good reasons.

But first let me be clear about this: By no means would I ever believe that evangelicals are necessarily or always or only more gullible than anyone else. What I am asking is if American evangelicals TEND to be too gullible for their own or anyone else’s good? Should they be taught to be more critical in their thinking?

As I have explained here many times, but I have to re-explain it for new readers, I grew up in the “thick” of American evangelicals. My uncle, for example, was a member of the national board of the National Association of Evangelicals. I taught in three evangelical universities, graduated from an evangelical college (BA) and an evangelical seminary (MA). I served as consulting and then contributing editor of Christianity Today, the main evangelical news and opinion magazine. I have spoke at numerous evangelical churches, conferences, conventions, meetings. I have been publicly called a leading evangelical theologian and influencer.

Now, on to my concern.

It began to grow in my mind when I came to know that many of my own evangelical friends and even family members believed, uncritically, absolutely bizarre stories whose tellers claimed they were true. I knew they were not true but could not put a dent in my fellow evangelicals’ armor of belief and denial.

I will point out just a few examples.

I have long had deep interest in cults and new religions. I taught course on “America’s Cults and New Religions” (which I advertised to students as “Unsafe Sects”). My course was an elective, so, like other professors of elective courses, I had to recruit students. I kept hearing a story from students, pastors, colleagues and other evangelical influencers. It said that evangelical Christians should not study cults or heresies but only biblical truth. That way, they would know the counterfeit (heresy) when they encountered it. According to the story, told and re-told, even in Millard Erickson’s otherwise admirable systematic theology, the Secret Service does not show bank tellers counterfeit money, only real money. Finally, out of exasperation, I wrote a letter to the Secret Service asking them about this. I received back a letter (which I still have) from a SS agent saying they DO show bank tellers counterfeit money during training sessions. I was not surprised. The first time I heard the story I knew it could not be true.

Another example: the “hole to hell.” Sometime in the 1980s a story began to circulate that Russian engineers had dug the deepest hole ever dug by anyone and that they heard screams coming from the bottom of the hole. Proof of hell? So the story claimed. I kept hearing it from fellow conservative, evangelical Christians. When I first heard it I knew it wasn’t true. It was the religious equivalent of an urban legend (these are called “evangelegends”). At a family reunion the story was being passed around and believed uncritically by everyone. I dared to speak up and say that Christianity Today had published an article debunking the story. It began with some Russian atheists who set out to prove how gullible Christians are. A few of my evangelical relatives chastised me for not believing the story.

Also during the 1980s and into the 1990s many, many American evangelicals bought deeply into “Satanic panic,” believing wild stories that I never believed. One of them that “made the rounds” was about a man who claimed to have been a high priest of a Satanic cult. He published at least one book about it. Again, Christianity Today found discrepancies in his story and debunked his claims. His book and his public talks were sensational, to say the least, and many, many evangelical Americans bought into his claims uncritically and elevated them to the status of canonical. Whenever I tried to debunk the book and its claims, evangelical students, friends, relatives, etc., let me know in no uncertain terms that I was wrong even to raise questions about the man and his story about himself. I went into a Christian bookstore and saw the book for sale long after Christianity Today had exposed it as mostly, if not totally, false. The owner rebuked me and told me to leave his store.

I could go on and on in the same vein. I came to believe that American evangelicals, not all but many if not most, have in their religious DNA a tendency to believe obviously false stories of a religious nature and to follow influencers (evangelist, “Bible teachers,” preachers, writers) uncritically, even when their stories, claims, teachings, personalities, actions, lifestyles, were to me OBVIOUSLY questionable at best.

A recent example is the so-called QAnon conspiracy myth. Many American conservative evangelicals have bought into it uncritically. It’s obviously false.

Why this American evangelical weakness? I can only remember that I was taught, as a young evangelical Christian, to “doubt your taught and believe your beliefs.” In other words, I was conditioned by my American evangelical subculture, especially on the popular, “grassroots” level, NOT to think critically but to uncritically accept as true whatever people above me in “God’s chain of command” said, no matter how blatantly questionable or even untrue it seemed to me.

When and how did I acquire my critical thinking skills? I trace that back to reading. One thing my parents, very conservative evangelical Christians, did not do was censor my reading habits. I had a grandmother who had been a school teacher and she fed me and my brother books that were age-appropriate and good literature throughout our childhood years and even into our teen years. I read voraciously, on my own, books, both fiction and non-fiction, that interested me. Scientists say that reading wires the brain to think critically. I believe that was true in my case.

A real turning point for me was this incident. When I was growing up in church and in our denomination I often heard a story about a female Bible college student who was being stalked by a predator at night. She tried to think of a Bible verse to yell at him but turned around and yelled “I’m all covered with feathers” several times. That scared him and he ran away. My parents claimed to know this student. But they never said her name. I accepted the story as true until after I left home and became Baptist and heard the story told from a Baptist pulpit by a Baptist minister who placed the incident far, far away from where my parents said it happened. After the sermon I asked him if he knew who this female Bible college student was. He didn’t know. I consulted a scholar who had published books about urban legends. He had the story in his catalogue of “evangelegends” and could trace its origin back to the 19th century. According to him, nobody ever knew who the rescued student was or where it happened.

Why is this relevant to Americans today? Because…something about American evangelicals and politics. I’ll let you draw the conclusion I’m thinking of.

What is the cure, if any? Evangelical pastors need to train their congregants to think critically, especially about stories and teachings that have no basis in reality and are, on their surfaces, obviously doubtful if not just impossible, even within a biblical-Christian worldview.

*Note: If you choose to comment, keep it relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful, not hostile or argumentative, and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

February 6, 2024

The Political Meaning of Christianity

Next Post

February 10, 2024 But Is It Worth It? A Question to Christian Trumpists

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"You are missing nothing. This is well said. My former colleague Bruce Ware wrote a ..."

Roger Olson

Calvinism’s Achilles Heel

"As I have said here many times, I believe God chose and chooses to limit ..."

Roger Olson

Calvinism’s Achilles Heel

"I holed onto the “Omni-“ attributes but define them differently and more biblically than do ..."

Roger Olson

Calvinism’s Achilles Heel

"If everything that happens, including every sinful act, is owing to God’s foreordaining will, AND ..."

John Middleton

Calvinism’s Achilles Heel

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which disciple is known as 'the Twin'?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Philip Andrew James Thomas