Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
What Are “Miracles” and Is Belief in Them Contrary to Science?

What Are “Miracles” and Is Belief in Them Contrary to Science?

Last updated on: September 5, 2023 at 9:32 am by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

What Are “Miracles” and Is Belief in Them Contrary to Science? 2023-09-05T09:32:03-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It seems the word “miracle” is being stretched out of shape. I hear it all the time on TV. I have developed the view that there are three meanings (uses) of the word “miracle” in today’s American culture: 1) something surprising to an individual or small circle of people, 2) something truly amazing to a large number of people, 3) something whose only cause could be God (or possibly some other supernatural power). I will give an example of each one.

Number “1” is exemplified by a person unexpectedly receiving a gift he or she thought would never be received, perhaps due to its cost. “It’s a Christmas miracle!” Number “2” is exemplified by the safe “landing” of an airliner in the Hudson River as depicted in the movie “Miracle on the Hudson” starring Tom Hanks. Notice that in both cases nothing supernatural is thought to have occurred. Number “3” is exemplified by…by what? Well, it WOULD BE exemplified by, say, a truly dead person coming back to life. By “truly dead” I mean brain dead and with somatic, physical decomposition.

It seems to me that, for the most part, only “3” is a true miracle and is what is meant by “miracle” when whether miracles happen and whether belief in them is reasonable is debated. The first two uses of “miracle” are popular, not technical. I suspect that at least four out of five utterances of “miracle” in popular culture and “Umgangsprache” (ordinal street talk) refer to events that fit categories “1” and “2.”

Especially in academic lingo, when arguments are had about “belief in miracles,” number 3 is intended. Only it is controversial.

I earned both a master’s degree and a PhD from Rice University in Houston, Texas, a bastion of secular scientism. Often, even by students in the Religious Studies Department, belief in “real miracles” was sneered at and ridiculed as contrary to modern science. Then I spent a year studying with German Lutheran theologian Wolfhart Pannenberg who believed in the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ as a real historical event, including the empty tomb. Then I taught theology (my first full time teaching position) at Oral Roberts University. The founder-president’s motto was “Expect a Miracle!” And yet, during my two years there, I never saw a real miracle. Then I taught at two Baptist institutions of higher education, Bethel College and Seminary (now Bethel University) and Baylor University. At both I encountered professors and even one dean who told me they did not believe in miracles and they meant of the third kind.

I had just arrived in Waco, Texas to teach theology at Baylor’s George W. Truett Theological Seminary when a recently retired Baylor history professor wrote a column about miracles in the local newspaper. In the column he argued that Christians must give up belief in miracles because believing in miracles is unscientific. I wrote a response which was published and received a phone call from a friend who taught in the philosophy department warning me about speaking against the retired professor because “even some of the regents are his former students and admirers.” Huh. I was glad I had tenure.

I do not think someone can be a Christian and deny miracles of the third kind because of the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Belief in the bodily resurrection (whatever its precise nature) and empty tomb is part and parcel of Christianity. A Christianity without the resurrection (e.g., Rudolf Bultmann’s) is inauthentic.

I think two problems have created much of the skepticism about miracles. First, philosopher David Hume famously defined a miracle as a violation of a natural law. And he argued that for any given event there is always a better explanation than “miracle.” Second, many celebrity scientists, speaking more as philosophers than scientists, have asserted that modern science and miracles are incompatible. Many teachers of science have conveyed that message to students.

Philosopher Thomas Reid responded to Hume by pointing out that natural laws are only regularities of God’s general providence, God not being only transcendent but also immanent. According to Reid, echoed later by C. S. Lewis in his book “Miracles,” a miracle is not a violation of a natural law as if God exists outside of nature only, but a miracle is a divine suspension of the usual workings of nature (natural laws being the normal and usual workings of God’s general providence and continuing creative activity).

But I was a bit stumped when lecturing on miracles and science at a Christian university. A science professor raised his hand and asked whether it would not be the case that a miracle, even such as Reid and Lewis described, would leave behind scientifically detectable consequences—sort of like a “ripple effect.” I assumed he was assuming an absolute uniformity of nature and a possible technology that could (someday) detect the effects of a miracle afterwards.

I did not have an adequate answer to him at the time and probably mumbled something that didn’t satisfy him. Today, after thinking about his question for a long time, I would say to him that I do not believe nature is absolutely uniform; there is true novelty in nature. An example is a genuinely, libertarian free choice acted upon. Second, I would tell him that I don’t think there ever could be a technology that could detect the after effects of every contingent and novel event within nature. I think he and I were/are thinking of “nature” very differently. Is his view necessary to modern science? What about quantum mechanics? At the time we did not have time to discuss his question in any depth or detail which is why I bring it up here. What say you?

As I have said here before, Craig Keener (Asbury Theological Seminary) has published books of case studies of verifiable miracles of the third kind. My African students and acquaintances testify of having seen real miracles and most, if not all, of them are well aware of modern science.

Is the bias against belief in miracles possibly more one of philosophy than of science itself? And yet, many celebrity scientists talk about miracles as if belief in them is obviously contrary to modern science.

Two questions, then: 1) Is belief in miracles (at least one, the resurrection of Jesus Christ) necessary for authentic Christianity, and 2) Is belief in miracles contrary to modern science?

*Note: If you choose to comment, make sure your comment is relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful, not hostile or argumentative, and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 1, 2023

Is Orthodoxy a Necessary Feature of “Evangelical?”

Next Post

September 6, 2023 Hegel in a Nutshell

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I can only guess. Because Lewis did say that it is possible for a Christian ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Appendix: The ..."

"I forgot to mention the vulture. That adds an especially terrible dimension to the photo. ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Appendix: The ..."

"Recently You Tube fed me a video of RC apologist Jimmy Akin articulating the logic ..."

Lzo

The Abolition of Man: Appendix: The ..."

"The photojournalist later committed suicide. He did chase the vulture away after taking the photo ..."

Randall David Born

The Abolition of Man: Appendix: The ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was thrown into a den of lions?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Joseph Jonah Daniel