Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

rogereolson

Belong, Believe, Behave?

Last updated on: September 15, 2023 at 11:47 am   by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

Belong, Believe, Behave? 2023-09-15T11:47:08-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Belong, Believe, Behave?

Some years ago I began to hear this motto especially among those associated with the so-called “emerging churches.” I spoke at several such churches, had students affiliated with them, spoke at conventions where they gathered.

The “new idea” often floated around in those circles was to allow people to belong (to the church) before they believe and certainly before they behave. Here, “believe” most often meant believe in the gospel and traditional truths of evangelical Christian orthodoxy. “Behave” most often meant something like “conform you personal lifestyle with biblical ethics and practices.”

I still hear this mantra occasionally: “Belong, believe, behave.” The order is what’s important here. Church leaders and others are meant to embrace unbelievers within full Christian fellowship, hoping that the church’s teaching and preaching will convince them to believe and eventually to change their lives.

I never believed this is a good idea. Of course, everything depends on what “belong” means. And I never heard that fully or adequately explained.

To me, to belong to a church means to agree with its core teachings and at least seek to conform to its ethical principles and rules. It might mean more, but to me it means at least that.

Can we imagine the ancient churches of the Roman Empire (and beyond) fully embracing a fellow adherents as equal communicants who do not believe in Jesus Christ’s resurrection, in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, in their need for God’s grace?

Now, if “belong” only means to welcome someone into attendance (in worship, Sunday School, Bible studies, etc.), that’s a different matter. But most moderate evangelical churches have always done that! The issue must be membership, otherwise “belong, believe, behave” has no newish meaning and it was promoted as a new policy among leaders of the emerging churches networks.

I know that someone will point to churches that have no traditional membership as such—yet. My response is that they do; it just maybe that they restrict “membership” to a few congregational leaders (pastoral staff, elders, deacons, whatever). And I would ask such churches what “belong” means if they strive to adopt a policy of belong, believe, behave. And I would ask them how long a person can be embraced as part of the congregation (as opposed to a visitor) if they do not come to believe and behave?

I certainly don’t promote the idea that a church member must agree with every “jot and tittle” of a longish doctrinal statement, but surely he or she ought to agree with the “heartbeat” and “ethos” of the church including basic biblical orthodoxy (speaking here of evangelical churches) and ought not to be proud of any “besetting sin” but seek to overcome it with the help of the congregation and the Holy Spirit.

I’m not surprised that the “emerging” or “emergent” church movement fizzled out. As I attended and spoke at an annual convention of their pastors and other leaders (a convention that no longer meets), I detected a definite lack of consensus about anything other than being “authentic” and different from traditional churches. One speaker, a major leader in the movement, spoke about how preaching is a violent act. I pointed out to him over lunch that he just committed a violent act. He was not amused.

There was just a lot of experimentation going on among the different congregations, leaders and thinkers associated with the emerging/emergent churches movement. Too much, in my humble opinion. It reminded me of the Jesus People Movement without the emotion. No center.

Some of you who remember the heyday of the movement (1990s into the first decade of this century) may remember that my friend Stanley Grenz was considered something of a leading theologian among emergent church people. I suspect that was because of his talk about a postmodern contribution to Christianity. But he told me privately that the sole reason he accepted the informal position of theologian of the emerging church/emergent church movement was to try to keep them theologically serious and balanced. He considered himself, so he told me, a “missionary” to them. I doubt many, if any, of them realized that. He thought there was a kind of anti-theological trend among many of the leading spokespersons of the movement.

*Note: If you choose to comment, keep it relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

 

 

Uncategorized

Previous Post



September 13, 2023

Unsafe Sects: Understanding Religious Cults

Next Post



September 18, 2023 The Upside Down Kingdom: Chapter Two: Mountain Politics

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Gleason Archer apparently believed in Molinism. I don’t. But, in any case, imagine standing over ..."

Roger Olson


Does God Save Everyone He Can?

"This does not actually refer to people who have never heard of Jesus, but I ..."

Tony


Does God Save Everyone He Can?

"Men Without Chests raises fascinating questions about morality, education, and the importance of developing strong ..."

sanjyot011keer


The Abolition of Man Part 1: ..."

"Lewis would probably say that your strategy for "illustrating that there IS a Tao" ("... ..."

Otto Tellick


The Abolition of Man: Appendix: The ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010




TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Golgotha" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mountain of God Place of the Skull Valley of Death House of Bread

Related posts from Roger E. Olson

Family

Does God Save Everyone He Can?

Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man: Appendix: The Tao

Roger E. Olson

Family

Why America Made Halloween Its Unofficial National Holiday

Roger E. Olson

Family

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: The Abolition...

Roger E. Olson

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Roman Bath(s)--Part 2

The Museum under and around the Roman Bath is excellent and well...

Vivek Ramaswamy is All American, And Evil

  We need to talk about Vivek Ramaswamy. I know, I know,...

My Experience with the G20 Interfaith Forum

Last week I spent three days helping coordinate media interviews and meetings...

How Do We See Jesus? Lessons From the...

In John 12;20-21, some Greeks came to Philip and said, "We would...

LBCF: Body and Soul

Jerry B. Jenkins sat at a computer and typed these words: “Let...

Have You Divorced Your Demons Yet?

Have you divorced your demons? Welcome back to our Spooky Judaism series....

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube