Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Can the Trinity Be Explained?

Can the Trinity Be Explained?

Last updated on: May 29, 2023 at 9:55 am by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

Can the Trinity Be Explained? 2023-05-29T09:55:14-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This train of thought, leading to this blog post, began the other day when I stumbled across a Youtube video entitled “Why Isaac Newton Was Hiding a Deadly Secret” (Channel “Thoughty2”). I was intrigued to see (really, to hear) what the “deadly secret” was.

A long time ago I learned about Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727) in some high school science or history class. But I didn’t learn that much about him. Later I learned that he was not only one of the most influential scientists of the modern age but also that he was a devout Christian who spent much of his time attempting to calculate the year of the Lord’s return. That is hardly ever mentioned in history or science classes.

So, I watched and listened to the relatively brief video presentation and found it informative and entertaining. However, the presenter (“Thoughty2”) made two mistakes when talking about Newton’s religious beliefs. He said that Newton was a Christian, but that he was a heretic. That is true—if orthodoxy is measured by the Nicene Creed. But he also said that Newton could have been killed by the church and the state for his heresy—that Jesus was not God and there is no Trinity—and that the doctrine of the Trinity, which Newton denied, is that God is “separated into three equal parts of the Holy Trinity.”

Could Newton have been executed for not believing in the Trinity? Possibly, but not likely. Newton was contemporary with John Milton who also denied the Trinity and, although Milton was criticized for that, he was never tried or executed. The age in which both men lived was, at least in Great Britain, relatively lenient with dissenters to orthodoxy.

More serious, however, is the presenter’s expression of the doctrine of the Trinity! Is God “separated into three equal parts?” Is that the what the Christian doctrine of the Trinity says? Most definitely not—although I know from experience teaching Christian theology in three Christian universities over almost forty years that many relatively mature Christian’s would not recognize that expression as heretical. And it is possible that Newton and Milton denied THAT expression of the doctrine of the Trinity AS DO I.

I well remember what happened after my first lecture on the Trinity. I explained the doctrine to the class. Afterwards a student came up to me and said “But you still haven’t explained the Trinity to us.” Later I thought I should have responded “I wasn’t trying to explain ‘the Trinity;’ I was trying to explain the doctrine of the Trinity.

I’m reminded of the title of a book by religion scholar Jonathan Z. Smith: “Map Is Not Territory.” (The title comes from Alfred Korzybski’s second principle of general semantics: namely, Non-All-ness.) The doctrine of the Trinity is one thing; the Trinity is something else. Because God is unique there can be no exact analogy to the oneness and unity of Father, Son and Holy Spirit. In fact, all analogies are heretical!

The doctrine of the Trinity is most definitely NOT that God is “separated into three equal parts.” This is what often happens when lay people, even many pastors and teachers, attempt to “explain” or express the doctrine of the Trinity. The doctrine of the Trinity expresses a mystery beyond human comprehension. It’s main purpose is to protect against distortions of what God has revealed about himself. But we have no knowledge of the inner “workings” of the community of three “persons” Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Much of the trouble begins with the word “persons” which, of course, is just the English translation of the Greek word “hypostases.” The Nicene Creed of 381 (Constantinople) used that Greek word to express the threeness of our one God. The Cappadocian Fathers, Basil, Gregory and Gregory, wrote many treatises explaining the difference between “ousia” (substance) and “hypostasis” (person) in the years leading up to the Council of Constantinople in 381. Augustine later said that we do not say “three persons” because we want to but because we have no alternative.

”Hypostasis” should be literally translated into English as “subsistence”—a single example of a general, shared substance. But even that does not do justice to the unity of the Godhead in revelation and in classical Christian doctrine. But American culture especially has introduced into the meaning of “person” such an individualistic connotation that it is almost impossible to cleanse it of that now.

When I teach doctrine and theology to Christians students (and sometimes to non-Christian students and others) I insist that they never use the word “separate” to describe the “distance” (none) between the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. I insist that they use “distinct” as is “three distinct persons” and realize that in this case “persons” does not mean individuals. I tell them that God is not a committee!

However, we cannot know or describe the actual reality of the Trinity; we can only know and describe the orthodox DOCTRINE of the Trinity and that matters because it protects from heresies such as tritheism which is what “separated into three equal parts” implies.

I also forbid students from referring to the persons of the Trinity as “parts” as if our God is like a puzzle, one piece of which could get lost.

Having said all of that, after years of teaching and writing about the doctrine of the Trinity, I have all but given up on trying to get Christians to think of it correctly.

I was recently in a Bible study of lay Christians when the doctrine of the Trinity came up in discussion. One visitor, not a regular attender, interjected that it’s really simple: God is like H2O…. I couldn’t let that go and had to explain why that common analogy is problematic. It leads straight into modalism, so common a heresy that it can hardly be called a heresy without making most Christians, at least in America, heretics! Everyone in the Bible study said that is what they thought the Trinity was like; they had all learned that analogy in Sunday School! So did I. But I later learned that it is at least quasi-heretical.

I want to conclude with something helpful, but the only thing I can think of is to say that IF you want to understand the Christian doctrine of the Trinity you need to read a good book like the one I wrote with Christopher Hall entitled simply “The Trinity” (Eerdmans). Or, on a less technical-historical level, read theologian Alister McGrath’s “Understanding the Trinity” (Zondervan).

*Note: If you choose to comment, be sure to keep it relatively brief, no more than 100 words, on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative), and devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 27, 2023

Truth and Knowledge: A Critical Realist Perspective

Next Post

May 31, 2023 What Does “Destroy Leftism in this Country” Mean?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I read Daane’s book The Freedom of God and loved it. I used it in ..."

Roger Olson

Calvinism’s Achilles Heel

"Wicked people who refuse to repent."

Roger Olson

Does God Save Everyone He Can?

"The point is that IF Nineveh were destroyed immediately after its repentance, its inhabitants would ..."

Roger Olson

Does God Save Everyone He Can?

"For a person to be forgiven by God he or she need only repent truly ..."

Roger Olson

Does God Save Everyone He Can?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king allowed the Jews to return from Babylon and rebuild their Temple?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Xerxes Nebuchadnezzar Cyrus Darius