Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
About “Why?” By A. van de Beek

About “Why?” By A. van de Beek

Last updated on: April 16, 2023 at 10:10 am by Roger E. Olson

0 Comments

About “Why?” By A. van de Beek 2023-04-16T10:10:27-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

About “Why?” By A. Van de Beek

This is for those of you who plan to read Bram van de Beek’s book “Why? On Suffering, Guilt and God” with me. Many of you have reported ordering the book. I want to give you a few suggestions about reading it before we begin in May.

First, please don’t read ahead; wait to read the “assigned” chapters until I announce them.

Second, the book takes its time to get to the main point—like nearly all European theology books I’ve read. In Europe (at least in Germany) theologians are expected to lay the “groundwork,” as it were, before revealing their thesis. You won’t know the fullness of Beek’s thesis until you’ve finished the book, but you will be able to detect where he is headed.

Third, be careful as you read not to confuse Beek’s own views with the ones he describes at some length with which he disagrees. It’s easily to forget whose views he’s talking about—another theologian’s (e.g., Karl Barth) or his own. Keep track of that as you read. I think this is a weakness of European theologians; they are not always very helpful in this regard—by reminding us of about whom they are “talking.” It’s easy to think “No! That can’t be his view!” Or “What? How can he say that?” When, in fact, he’s referring to some other theologian’s view(s).

Fourth, don’t look for philosophical theology in this book. It’s my considered opinion that what Beek is trying to do is follow the biblical narrative about God closely and faithfully without allowing philosophy (e.g., Platonism) to say “That can’t be true because we know God is ‘perfect being’ and therefore must be immutable and impassible.”

Fifth, just to give something away, a bit of a spoiler, the whole book is Beek’s attempt to reconcile God’s goodness and omnipotence—given the facts recorded in scripture about God’s decisions and actions and given the facts of history and the world as we actually know and experience them. He admits that some will object to “anthropomorphic” treatment of God, but he argues, as you will see, that all language about God is anthropomorphic; it’s just a matter of when you call something in the Bible “anthropomorphic” and dismiss it as “figure of speech” (or don’t).

Read carefully, thoughtfully and well. I look forward to this re-reading and conversation about “Why?”

*Note: If you choose to comment, make sure your comment is relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, and civil and respectful (not hostile or argumentative). Also, make sure it is devoid of pictures or links.*

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 15, 2023

The Basic Difference between Lutheran Theology and Reformed Theology

Next Post

April 18, 2023 What Is “Church?” Any Group that Calls Itself “Church?”

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"No doubt Lewis was inspired by earlier thinkers. Ironically (or perhaps serendipitously) I am now ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"I am sure Lewis would agree. After all, as a Christian he believed in original ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"If I’m not mistaken, the quote from Lewis is his interpretation of the “Conditioners’” own ..."

Roger Olson

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

"Thank you! It's been a great re-read of a thought provoking, but somewhat dense, little ..."

Øyvind J. Karstad

The Abolition of Man: Chapter 3: ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Four beasts rose from the sea—one like a lion with eagle's wings, one like a bear, one like a leopard, and a fourth terrifying beast. What did these represent?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Four kingdoms Four kings Four judgments Four ages