Fundamentalish: A New Term for An Old Phenomenon

Last updated on: December 26, 2022 at 5:43 pm by Roger E. Olson

Fundamentalish: A New Term for An Old Phenomenon 2022-12-26T17:43:21-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Fundamentalish: A New Term for an Old Phenomenon

*Note: If you choose to comment, keep it brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, addressed to me, civil and respectful (not argumentative or hostile), and devoid of pictures or links. Know that this is not a discussion board; not all comments are approved for posting here. I look for constructive responses even if they are critical.*

I have read many books and articles about Christian fundamentalism. I’m reading a major one, a scholarly book, published in 2008 right now. The author is obviously knowledgeable about the subject, but her presentation is confusing. She will be writing about fundamentalism and then suddenly be writing about evangelicalism in general without distinction. She acknowledges a real distinction within evangelical Christianity, especially in Britain and America, between “the new evangelicals” (neo-evangelicalism) and fundamentalism, but her criticisms of fundamentalism, if valid, would be true of most non-fundamentalist evangelicals also. For her, it seems, anyway, any belief in biblical inerrancy, however defined, is fundamentalist. In fact, so it seems, any belief in the Bible as factually true and especially defense of that counts as fundamentalism. But, then, she suddenly shifts to distinguishing fundamentalism from evangelicalism without making the distinction clear.

I would like to propose a new term: “fundamentalish.” Fundamentalism was a relatively clear movement in the first half of the 20th century. While the movement may have died away, its ethos lives on—among people who call themselves fundamentalist and many who don’t. Many fundamentalish Christians prefer to call themselves “conservative evangelicals.” “Fundamentalish” is my new term for those conservative evangelicals who don’t appear to be fundamentalist in the same way as, say, Bob Jones, John R. Rice, Carl McIntire, et al, but who embody and promote many of the same views and tactics. Most of them would deny being fundamentalists, preferring to call themselves “conservative evangelicals,” but scratch their surfaces a little and suddenly something of the old fundamentalism appears.

One definition of fundamentalism is “maximal conservatism in matters of religion.” In other words, a strong reluctance to change beliefs, biblical interpretations, doctrinal standards. Along with that was, and still is to some extent, a reluctance to enter into fellowship and cooperation with Christians they deem unfaithful to traditional biblical interpretations and doctrinal beliefs. They TEND to regard almost everything they believe, as Christians, about the Bible and doctrine, as equally important. Very little is left open as opinion. Among them there is little room for disagreement or new ways of thinking. Many elevate dispensationalism to the status of Christian orthodoxy.

That old fashioned kind of fundamentalism, even fundamentalism that regards only the King James Version of the Bible as valid, is still around. I have visited their churches. Most of them advertise themselves as “Unaffiliated Baptist” or “Independent Baptist” or “Bible Church” with something like “KJV Only” in small letters somewhere on the brochure, advertisement and/or church sign. I would say that that kind of fundamentalism is not as strong, numerically, as before.

But the mentality of fundamentalism is still around and may be growing, especially among conservative evangelicals who would strongly deny being fundamentalist. It appeared to me during my “rise” among mainline, moderate evangelicals during the 1990s especially. A student showed me one of my books purchased at a mainline, evangelical bookstore. There was a sticky note on it, placed there by the chain that owned the store, that said “Warning: This Book May Be Dangerous to Your Spiritual Life.” The book was my magnum opus, “The Story of Christian Theology: Twenty Centuries of Tradition and Reform” (IVP). My student asked the bookstore manage why the sticker on the front of the book and he responded that the company that owned the store required that notice on every book by me because I’m considered too “progressive.” This is a Christian bookstore (and etc.) chain that almost everyone would know if I mentioned its name.

Earlier here I told the story of being canceled by the executive committee of the Evangelical Theological Society. My friend Stanley Grenz was canceled by Christianity Today (as a matter of unofficial policy they would not publish anything by him). Stan, like I, was an orthodox evangelical theologian! I found out through my CT connections that a member of the board of the magazine insisted on his being canceled as a contributor to the magazine, merely for writing a brief article, which CT published, about the theology our common theological teacher Wolfhart Pannenberg in honor of his sixtieth birthday.

My experience “in the thick” of American evangelicalism tells me that many American evangelicals who would vehemently deny being fundamentalists behave like the fundamentalists of old. And I am not denigrating anyone’s character, just commenting on the common ground shared by many self-identified fundamentalists and conservative evangelicals.

The myth believed and shared among allegedly non-fundamentalist (postfundamentalist) evangelicals is that they left fundamentalism behind. Maybe they all did leave certain aspects of fundamentalism behind such as the obsession with the King James Version of the Bible and young earth creationism. They may not be as obsessed with a certain eschatological scheme (of the end times); they might not be dispensationalists or even premillennialists. However, their hyper-orthodoxy, their heresy-hunting, their sometimes underhanded treatments of those among them who they consider theologically unsafe because they dare to think new thoughts, to push the envelope of “the received evangelical tradition,” exceeds that of many true, self-identified fundamentalists. I call them “fundamentalish evangelicals.”

But there’s another group of men and women I call “fundamentalish”—popular “Bible teachers” who spew out book after book allegedly written by them mostly about the “end times” but also often about the Bible, interpreting it as if modern philosophy and science never happened. Some of these “Bible teachers” are extremely popular; if I named them most of you would at least have heard of them. Some of you might even think they are wonderful Bible expositors. Almost all of them are cessationists, dispensationalists, rapturists, and/or Calvinists who write as if Calvinism is simply a “transcript of the gospel.” These books by these “Bible teachers” crowd the shelves of the Christian bookstores that remain. (O, God, why did you allow Cokesbury bookstores to die?) (Do NOT respond to that; I know that many Cokesbury bookstores carried books even I would consider heretical, but they also carried a lot of good Christian books.)

Many of those popular “Bible teachers” also appear in hundreds if not thousands of Youtube videos. Their main feature is that they are absolutely certain about everything they say even though much of what they say is highly debatable.

These, too, are what I call “fundamentalish” even though many, probably most of them, would harshly deny being “fundamentalists.” They proudly proclaim themselves “evangelicals.” Every one of them that I have investigated at some time has criticized Billy Graham for being shallow. They claim to be “deep,” but much of what they “teach” flies in the face of sound biblical hermeneutics to say nothing of the best of science and even logic. They specialize in proof-texting and revel in contradictions.

Avoid them. Do you want to read good Christian writers? Do you want to listen to and watch good Christian teachers on Youtube? You can do no better than stick to C. S. Lewis and N. T. Wright. I also highly recommend Greg Boyd even though I know he has been “canceled” by many evangelicals. I also recommend Timothy Keller even though he is a Calvinist and (strangely to my mind) a leader in the Gospel Coalition. Also, Ben Witherington and Scot McKnight. Also Andy Stanley and Brian Zahnd. I will even dare to recommend my former student Adam Hamilton, knowing that he is probably somewhere to the “left” of me theologically. I don’t agree with everything he says or writes, but his books are generally helpful as are many of his sermons and teachings.

The key is to become a discerning Christian, capable of reading, watching, and listening with open but critical awareness. Of course, my publisher would be unhappy if I did not say this: Begin with my book “Essentials of Christian Thought: Seeing Reality through the Biblical Story” (Zondervan) You do not need to be a scholar to read and understand it. It’s simply a good place for you to start becoming a critical-thinking, discerning Christian, if I say so myself.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 23, 2022

Should Christians Celebrate Christmas?

Next Post

December 30, 2022 About Churches: They Are All Human

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who came to Jesus at night to ask about being born again?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Simon Zacchaeus Cornelius Nicodemus