The Heterodox Hart? Reflections on “You Are Gods” Chapter Five “Geist’s Kaleidoscope”

Last updated on: September 11, 2022 at 8:04 am by Roger E. Olson

The Heterodox Hart? Reflections on “You Are Gods” Chapter Five “Geist’s Kaleidoscope” 2022-09-11T08:04:36-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Heterodox David Bentley Hart? Reflections on “You Are Gods,” Chapter Five “Geist’s Kaleidoscope: Some Questions for Cyril O’Regan”

*Note: If you post a comment here make sure it is relatively brief (no more than 100 words), on topic, respectful and civil (not hostile or argumentative) and devoid of links or photos.*

Some of you are reading David Bentley Hart’s new book “You Are Gods: On Nature and Supernature” along with me. Some of you have already finished the book. Many of you who are reading it have gone ahead of me. I am taking my time to savor it, reflect on it, think judiciously what to say about it. I apologize for dragging this out, but for me it is worth it.

Hart’s books and essays are bracing, challenging, sometimes perplexing, often verbose and obscure. I like a good challenge. I rarely read books of theology that do not challenge my mind. Hart is a “cutting edge” theologian with a growing following. There are many reasons to “take him on” even though he can be extremely difficult to understand.

In Chapter Five “Geist’s Kaleidoscope: Some Questions for Cyril O’Regan” Hart interacts with and questions Irish Catholic theologian Cyril O’Regan of the University of Notre Dame. O’Regan has written many books, among them “The Heterodox Hegel.” I need to read that as I am frequently drawn back to Hegel. Years ago I read through Hegel’s “Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion” and some of his other writings and several scholarly books about his philosophy, especially his metaphysics and thoughts about God.

In this chapter Hart does several things. I will only mention and briefly interact with a few of them.

First, Hart SEEMS to defend Gnosticism: “It has always been an integral aspect of aboriginal Christianity; a certain spiritual suspicion or agitation or disquiet, typically latent but also frequently resurgent, intrinsic to the very substance of the gospel in its first, apocalyptic proclamation.” (65) He challenges modern interpretations of Gnosticism and expresses an opinion that original Gnosticism was not really as it has come to be misunderstood.

Second, Hart SEEMS to express real appreciation for “the mystical tradition” in Christianity, a stream of thought that I would call “esoteric Christianity” that has often been compared, by others, with Gnosticism. An example is the German Lutheran mystic (or whatever he was) named Jakob Boehme.

Third, perhaps most disturbing of all is Hart’s SEEMING defense of Arius: “Arius was in many respects a profoundly conservative theologian; certainly, in the context of Alexandrian theology, he was a more faithful representative of many of the most venerable schools of Trinitarian thought than were the champions of the Nicene settlement.” (91)

Fourth, Hart interacts much with philosopher Hegel, but SEEMINGLY mostly interested in blasting “post-Hegelian theology.” Unfortunately, Hart never mentions names of these post-Hegelian theologians. Who does he mean? Could he mean, among others, Karl Barth? On page 83 he points in that direction: “The infinite God of absolute volition is inverted into infinite indeterminate volition becoming God. God willfully positing a history of predilective predestination as an act of omnipotent sovereignty is inverted into God sovereignty determining and ‘electing’ himself in and through history.”

It is unbecoming of Hart to blast these allegedly horrible “post-Hegelian [modern] theologians” without naming any. Could he mean Pannenberg? Pannenberg is the best known modern post-Hegelian Protestant theologian. Or perhaps Moltmann? There are hints in the chapter that he means both. But it’s difficult to tell. He does tell us that he is talking about “Many Lutheran systematic theologians of the twentieth century.” He should name them.

Fifth, and especially disturbing to me, is Hart’s SEEMING dismissal of any correct understanding of Christian orthodoxy. He SEEMS to describe Christian orthodoxy as a moving target throughout history. Here is one of his concluding (partial) paragraphs: “the ‘original’ [orthodoxy] itself is not a discrete, inert object; it is, rather, by its very nature, a dynamic process of change, one not only tolerating, but actually subsisting in a series of accretions, suppressions, revisions, and renewals.” (94) I could quote many other passages near the end of the chapter in which Hart SEEMS to dismiss the whole idea of retrieving original orthodoxy.

Sixth, back to metaphysics and ontology, on page 89 Hart SEEMS to express what he means by “divinization” (“theosis”): “In the case of Christian thought, this means a proleptic awareness of the divinization of creatures who are by nature meant to become gods in God.”

I find the most disturbing part of this chapter Hart’s SEEMING defense of Arius. I find the most encouraging part of this chapter Hart’s darts thrown at theological voluntarism—the idiotic notion that God’s will is not governed by any eternal, unchanging nature or character.

I am not yet prepared to label Hart “heterodox” (which is just a nice way of saying “heretical”), but this chapter raises that question. I am sure that many of Hart’s fans will find his SEEMING denial of our access to any “aboriginal Christian orthodoxy” that excludes Gnosticism and even Arianism troubling.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 9, 2022

Is There a Checklist for Determining “Christian Orthodoxy?”

Next Post

September 14, 2022 Who Is a “Heretic?”

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth