Let’s Talk about Correctness (Political)–Theologically

Last updated on: September 2, 2021 at 11:35 am by Roger E. Olson

Let’s Talk about Correctness (Political)–Theologically 2021-09-02T11:35:27-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Let’s Talk about Correctness (Political)—Theologically

The term “political correctness” has been around a long time. I think I first heard it used about language in the early 1980s. Generally speaking, “political correctness” is the idea and practice of using language in ways that promote equality and liberation from oppression. I will offer here, initially, just one example. A student refers to all humans beings, collectively, as “man” as in “Man is created in God’s image and likeness.” Today it is generally taken for granted that the student has committed a faux pas; he or she has spoken in a politically incorrect manner because “man” excludes women in such a sentence. Of course, the student did not intend to exclude women, but proponents of politically correct language generally do not take intention into account when examining language. The incorrectness lies in the effect of the words, not the user’s intention. The effect of using “man” for “humankind” or just “people” is to oppress women because, at least in English, “man” refers primarily to males. Thus, in order to include females equally with males the student should have said “Humans are created in God’s image and likeness.”

Some proponents of politically correct (or just correct) speech will go further and argue that even the word “God” is incorrect because, traditionally, God is spoken of as male rather than female. Language about “God” excludes women, so “God/ess” is preferred (Rosemary Ruether).

Obviously, to anyone who has worked in an academic setting in the United States, this whole issue of politically correct and politically incorrect language has run amok. Sides have been taken; lines have been drawn in the sand. One side stubbornly resists adjusting language just because the movers and shakers of, say, the Social Work profession say so. Another side rushes to find new forms of politically correct and politically incorrect speech and stay “ahead” of everyone else. For example, one professor recently told his class not to talk about “helping” the poor because that implies being over them and hierarchy is bad. “Coming along side them” is the new politically correct language. Numerous other examples could be given.

Not very long ago I was in an academic meeting and uttered the term “multicultural.” I was quickly informed that the correct phrase for the same phenomenon is now “cultural engagement.” I did not have the opportunity, but I wanted to ask “Who says?” I know for a fact that twenty-five years ago “multicultural” was the politically correct way of referring to the correct practice of bringing diverse cultures together in equality—in the curriculum, in pedagogy, etc. I still wonder who it is that has the power to determine what counts as politically correct and politically incorrect speech. I don’t know, but whoever they are, they have a great deal of authority and power in academic settings. Talk about hierarchy.

Rarely would proponents of politically correct speech (including in writing) call what they are advocating “political correctness.” They prefer to say that it is simply sensitivity in language, or possibly liberating language. They rightly say that our words use us as much as we use words. In other words, some words and phases do take on positive or negative socio-political-economic power—to harm or to help (or should I say “come alongside?”).

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

Like any good thing, political correctness can be abused. But as the old saying goes, abuse does not justify disuse but calls for proper use. Here are some principles I will dare to suggest for guiding this proper use of correct language about people.

First, sensitivity to others’ feelings is not only nice; it is also Christian. Christians are called to love people and love calls for sensitivity to others’ feelings. And sensitivity to others’ feelings sometimes calls for using language in ways we are not used to and perhaps do not fully understand.

Second, language does have power and Christians should recognize that and use the power of language with care, guided by love and sensitivity to others. It is simply not true that “Sticks and stones…but words can never hurt.” Words can hurt. If a person or group of people say that our words hurt them, then we should listen and learn and be willing to adjust our words so as not to hurt them.

Third, oppression really does exist; some people are disadvantaged by social structure and sometimes by language. If our language really does exclude, disadvantage, oppress any person or group of people, we should be willing to change our language.

Fourth, on the other hand, however, we can resist demands to change our words insofar as we are convinced, after careful thought and even study, that the demands are unreasonable and are nothing more than attempts on others’ parts to manipulate and control us. This, however, should only happen after empathetically putting ourselves in others’ “shoes” and asking ourselves how we would feel if that word or those words were used about us.

For example, if a poor person to whom I am giving aid objected to my saying I “helped” them, I would acquiesce just out of kindness—while silently questioning the objection. However, if a social worker told me not to speak about “helping” the poor I would ignore him or her and be inwardly bemused if not amused.

My principle is that language is powerful—especially in the mouths (or writings) of powerful people and should be used sensitively. However, the flip side of that principle is that some people are using rules about language only to exercise power over others.

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 1, 2021

Let's Talk about Circumcision--Theologically

Next Post

September 5, 2021 Let's Talk about Critical Race Theory--Theologically

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the collective name of the stories Jesus told?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalms Parables Gospel Miracles