Thank God for Science and Scientists, but…

Last updated on: December 15, 2020 at 9:09 am by Roger E. Olson

Thank God for Science and Scientists, but… 2020-12-15T09:09:00-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last evening (Monday, December 14, 2020) I watched an hour long “television news magazine” program that focused on the race to create a vaccine for the COVID-19 virus. Of course, it was a condensed “tour” of the process—from beginning to now (not the end)—and very interesting and enlightening. It didn’t change my mind about science but added to my profound appreciation of science and most of what scientists do.

Like many conservative, evangelical Protestant Christians in America, I grew up in a church and family that was, to say the least, ambivalent about science. We didn’t necessarily view science itself as evil, but we spoke about it as filled with dangers because we believed many scientists were atheists and used science to undermine religious faith. Looking back on it now, and looking around at so many American Christians who are still suspicious of science, I suspect it all goes back to the big controversy about evolution. But I won’t repeat that saga; so many books have been written about it (including one by my former student and colleague Chris Rios entitled After the Monkey Trial: Evangelical Scientists and a New Creationism (Fordham University Press, 2014).

Over time, however, I overcame my ambivalence about science and have promoted belief in science as a powerful good—even to students coming into my classes from very conservative families and churches. Sometimes I begin by asking them what they think of modern medicine and whether they are reluctant (for other than financial reason) to go to the doctor and hospital when they are ill. Very, very few express any fear or distrust of modern medicine. Then I point out to them how modern medicine is rooted in science, how, without modern science, modern medicine would never have come about.

Usually, in conversations such as these I discover (or discern) that the real problem is not with science itself but with what I call scientism—the belief that appears occasionally among some scientists and philosophers that modern science holds the answers—potentially if not already—to all of life’s important questions. And that modern science conflicts with belief in God, if not with religion generally.

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

What I have tried to do over the years is help students and church people recognize the difference between science itself, as a method of discovering truth and creating things that make life better for humanity generally and individuals, and scientism which is a kind of religion of science—what Paul Tillich would call a “quasi-religion” (which is what he did call secular humanism). That is, scientism makes science an ultimate concern to the exclusion of anything spiritual and especially supernatural. It is a form of naturalism—the worldview that nature is all there is. My point has been, for many years, in teaching religion and theology, that science itself is nobody’s enemy; it is something for which we should be grateful and thank God. But “do not confuse science with scientism!”

A problem that often arises, however, is that some student or lay person in a church where I am speaking knows that the majority of modern American scientists are agnostics or atheists. Then I point to some who most definitely are not and yet are leaders in the modern scientific enterprise—such as Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health and leader of the Genome Project that mapped the human genome. He is also one of the founders of Biologos—a non-profit organization devoted to integrating Christianity and modern science.

I also like to point out that Princeton Seminary theologian Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield, one of the “fathers” of American fundamentalism, a strong believer in biblical inerrancy, was a theistic evolutionist who saw no major conflict between the Bible and Darwinian evolution.

My European, British, Canadian and other non-American evangelical friends (such as N. T. Wright) tell me that in those countries, evangelical Christians are not nearly as anti-science as in the United States. (Of course, not all evangelical Christians in the United States are anti-science; the point is that the percentage of American evangelical Christians who are anti-science seems higher than in other countries.)

My wish is that we, evangelical Christians, could successfully convince our brothers and sisters that the problem is not science but only scientism and that the two are not the same. But that is a challenge since so many leading American scientists have been promoters of scientism and have been atheists or at least agnostics. Carl Sagan, whose series Cosmos was seen by most American students in high school, and Stephen Hawking and Neil DeGrasse Tyson are the “trinity” of scientists beloved by the American media and promoted as the leading spokesmen for science. All three have expressed skepticism about religion and God on the basis of science. The problem is, of course, that science cannot falsify belief in God. Science and religion are compatible but separate realms of discovery and explanation.

I have spent much of my career as a Christian theologian trying to teach all kinds of American church people (I speak often in many churches) that science is not the enemy of Christianity. It’s an uphill climb.

The American Scientific Affiliation and Biologos are two Christian organizations that work very hard and very competently to help conservative Christians overcome their biases against and fears of science. I recommend their publications and Youtube videos and other resources most enthusiastically.

Many conservative American Christians will line up to receive their COVID vaccine shots while continuing to be extremely suspicious of science. What they need to realize is that the vaccine is made possible by science, including evolutionary science. The problem with evolution is not the mechanics of it but (again) evolutionism—the belief that evolution explains everything about life to the exclusion of God or any spiritual or supernatural force. That is not necessary for belief in evolution as a mechanism of changes within and among life forms.

For those of you interested in pursuing this point I recommend Saving Darwing: How to Be a Christian and Believe in Evolution by Karl W. Giberson (HarperOne, 2009).

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 13, 2020

Waiting for Inspiration to Hit: Stay Tuned!

Next Post

December 18, 2020 A Look at Some Roots of the Political Paranoia Gripping America

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth