What Is a “Miracle?”

Last updated on: November 6, 2020 at 8:47 am by Roger E. Olson

What Is a “Miracle?” 2020-11-06T08:47:07-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Recently I blogged here rather pessimistically that theology might be dead. By that I meant that Christian theologians’ ideas, even consensus ones, those arrived at virtually across the spectrum, do not seem to trickle down into pulpits or pews. Today I want to give an example.

I often ask Christians “What is a miracle?” The typical response is “A violation of natural law.” Now, of course, I mean this “typical response” is from Christians who have an answer. Those who don’t usually agree with the few who do.

Almost no Christian theologian I know would define a miracle that way. And many of us are simply dismayed at such a definition of “miracle.” Where has that come from? Why do so many Christians think a miracle is that?

That definition of “miracle” really began with Scottish skeptical philosopher David Hume (d. 1776). Of course it has older roots; many of the deists before him would almost certainly have agreed. But, so far as I know, “a violation of a natural law” is Hume’s usual definition of “miracle” and he denied that such can exist because he believed, as many did during the 17th and 18th and even 19th centuries, in the uniformity of nature. That is, all things in the physical world are ruled completely, exhaustively, by mathematically describable natural laws such as gravity.

The general “picture” of God and the world lurking behind this common definition of “miracle” is a thoroughly deistic one—that God exists outside of nature and that nature works independently of God’s immanent, general providence.

This is how I suspect most American Christians think of miracles—divine violations of natural laws. And some deny miracles on that basis, because they wonder why God would violate his own natural laws, and they wonder how the world could operate naturally, with regularity, after a violation of a natural law, and others affirm miracles but view them as God “stepping in from outside of nature” to interfere with its normal workings.

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

It is my considered, scholarly opinion, as a historian of Christian theology, that very few modern Christian theologians—whether “liberal” or “conservative”—would define “miracle” as a “violation of the laws of nature.” But our best attempts to explain miracle otherwise have mostly fallen on deaf ears. I have never, even once, encountered a Christian minister or lay person who defines “miracle,” when asked, in the way the vast majority of thoughtful, reflective Christian theologians define it.

Of course, “thoughtful, reflective Christians” are diverse thinkers; it’s doubtful you would get exactly the same words out of any two of them—when defining a concept like “miracle.” But if you listen carefully and are not distracted by minor wording differences, you will find that those who believe in miracles define “miracle” very differently from “violation of the laws of nature.”

So, hopefully, by now, you are chafing for an example. How would most thoughtful, reflective Christian theologians define “miracle?” Over a century ago, in 1901, Oberlin College president Henry Churchill King offered one with which I suspect the vast majority of thoughtful, reflective Christian theologians would agree. He wrote in Reconstruction in Theology that miracles are “God’s loving adaptations of his actions in nature to the highest needs of his children.” (75) King affirmed the reality of “the universality of law” but explained natural laws as “modes of God’s activity” (57)

King and the vast majority of modern Christian theologians reject the popular deist “picture” of God existing outside of nature and nature operating independently of God. Rather, we view God as both transcendent and immanent and nature’s operations as one aspect of God’s general providence. Natural laws, then, are regularities of God’s immanent upholding and regulating of the natural world. They do not exist or work independently of God.

Now, of course this raises many questions, but answering them all is not my aim here. It would take a large volume (or two or three). My point is that the generally-agreed-on worldview of especially modern Christian theologians is not deistic and excludes any idea of God outside of nature such that in order to do something unusual within it he has to “violate” natural laws.

Of course someone will object that this Christian worldview violates modern natural science. It does not. The scientist in his or her “laboratory” (whether indoors or outdoors or wherever) does not have to think of natural laws as modes of God’s general providential activity to do what he or she does. It is we Christians who must integrate modern science and its discoveries of natural laws and the regularities of nature with our biblical faith and theology and vice versa. That is, the Christian scientist (I do not mean member of the Church of Christ, Scientist), must think of natural laws the way I have described above insofar as he or she wants to avoid falling into the error of “two truths”—one thing being true “in church” and its opposite being true “in the laboratory.”

So what has happened? Why do so many Christians think of miracles as violations of natural laws?

There can only be two answers.

First, they have been brainwashed by education and culture generally to think of God and the world deistically. That is, they have been told that nature is a closed causal system of mechanical laws that has no room for real novelty or variation. Even most modern physicists don’t think of it that way, but many teaches of science still present it that way.

Second, they have either not been exposed to thoughtful, reflective theology or have ignored it.

Again, I personally do not know of any thoughtful, reflective Christian theologian who would define “miracle” as a “violation of the laws of nature.” That idea of miracle is simply not accepted by Christian theologians. But who listens to Christian theologians? Or even to C. S. Lewis who, in his book Miracles clearly and unequivocally expressed the idea of miracles I am espousing here.

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 3, 2020

Some Random Thoughts on Another Election Day in the U.S.A.

Next Post

November 11, 2020 Distinguishing between a Movement and Its Ethos

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the name of the garden where Jesus prayed before His arrest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Eden Gethsemane Bethany Golgotha