The Answer to “Whose Business Is It Anyway?” (About Moral and Immoral Behaviors)

Last updated on: October 1, 2020 at 7:45 am by Roger E. Olson

The Answer to “Whose Business Is It Anyway?” (About Moral and Immoral Behaviors) 2020-10-01T07:45:56-05:00 Roger E. Olson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Petition · LETS PURGE "THE PURGE" And ban this new TV series · Change.org

Whenever the question of the morality or ethical correctness of something legal arises someone in the crowd will say “Whose business is that”—so long as the behavior being examined is legal and does not have a negative impact on that person. But, of course, that is extremely shallow, individualistic ethics. “No man is an island.”

We are not talking here about what is or should be legal. The only question here is why anything someone else does should matter to me, or to you, or to anyone, so long as it cannot be demonstrated that the behavior does not affect me or you. Again, the answer is “No man is an island.”

*Sidebar: The opinions expressed here are my own (or those of the guest writer); I do not speak for any other person, group or organization; nor do I imply that the opinions expressed here reflect those of any other person, group or organization unless I say so specifically. Before commenting read the entire post and the “Note to commenters” at its end.*

Simon and Garfunkel sang “I Am an Island,” but the song was meant to illustrate how sad such an existence is.

So to you who ask “Whose business is it, anyway?” I ask this: Why should you feel anger when a powerful male congressman calls a minority female congresswoman an obscene name or phrase? It doesn’t affect you—especially if you are not a member of her district and are a white male. It literally cannot have any affect on you–except emotionally (repulsion, anger, frustration).

Two brothers have sex with each other (in the movie “Godless” about which I blogged recently). Why is that anyone’s business? Why is it anyone’s business if a man (or woman) hates people of color—so long as it doesn’t affect you? You say “Well, it does affect me because it harms society.” How does that affect you—if you are a person of majority and privilege? It doesn’t—unless it’s just wrong. And it can only be wrong if “no man is an island” and humanity has a built in basic conscience about right and wrong that is connected to a higher law than biology or social contract?

People asked Martin Luther King, Jr. why he was breaking race laws in the South. His ultimate answer was that there is a “higher law” than “man’s laws.” Most people would agree. But what is that “higher law?” Where does it “reside?” On what is it based? What makes it “higher?”

MLK knew the answers to those questions—God.

Don’t confuse the issues I am raising. I am not asking about legality; I am asking why we should feel revulsion when two brothers have sex with each other. Why we should believe that’s shameful—even if it is not demonstrably harming anyone. For the same reason we should feel it is shameful when a white male congressman calls a minority congresswoman an obscene name. It’s just wrong—even if it doesn’t affect you or me in any direct way. It vulgarizes and degrades humanity which knows some things are vulgarizing and degrading—especially incest. But why? If there is no cosmic moral order? And how can there be any cosmic moral order if there is no God or anything like God? From Plato to Kant to Horkheimer, non-religious philosophers have even recognized the necessity of God (or something like God) for objective right and wrong that transcend mere subjective preference or social construction.

Now, even though I hesitate to go here, I MUST raise the issues of sex between humans and animals. A man in the county where I live was recently arrested for having sex with a dog. It happens. Tell me, if you dare, that that’s not morally repugnant, disgusting, shameful—irrespective of whether it should be illegal or legal. No person was harmed. It’s questionable whether the animal was even harmed. I will simply not believe you if you say that such an act is “nobody’s business.” It may not be a matter for the criminal justice system, but the practice of it is shameful. Why? It’s sick. Why? What if the man says “It was my dog and you have no right to judge me?” You would nevertheless object that, indeed, you do have the right to judge his action as absolutely, objectively, morally repugnant and shameful (I hope). But why—unless there is some cosmic moral order in the universe, intuitively built into us, that makes it so?

Again, here, in this discussion thread, we are not talking about law; we are talking about morality and ethics.

You must know of the American media franchise called “The Purge.” If not, look it up. Imagine with “The Purge” a future dystopian society in which it is legal, one day a year, for twelve hours, to commit murder. So the legality question is taken off the table. Back to my question. Why would it be morally, ethically wrong to participate in “The Purge” by murdering people? Why would you feel disgust, horror, revulsion, at such participation and behavior? Only because you don’t like it? If nature is all there is, what would make it objectively wrong? Social contract? Wait. In that society the social contract is that it is okay to commit murder within the law. Only because it is…what? Without some higher law than “man’s law” (in the broadest sense), what makes it possible to say about any behavior “That would always and everywhere be wrong” where “wrong” means more than “I wouldn’t like it?”

You say “Well, our genetic code and accumulative millennia of adaptive experience and behavior make it wrong.” How so? How can that, even if true, over ride the freedom of individuals and societies to decide their own rules? In a world of over population and pent-up aggression, maybe (I don’t think this but only because I believe in God) something like “The Purge” would be a good thing. It’s at least conceivable, you have to admit, if you don’t believe there is some transcendent, universal, cosmic moral order. The same with bestiality and incest and everything people might want to do.

In a universe without God or something like God, might makes right. There’s no getting around it. Just admit it. Or don’t…and rest in irrational denial and look forward to a future where anything might turn out to be morally and ethically okay.

*Note to commenters: This blog is not a discussion board; please respond with a question or comment only to me. If you do not share my evangelical Christian perspective (very broadly defined), feel free to ask a question for clarification, but know that this is not a space for debating incommensurate perspectives/worldviews. In any case, know that there is no guarantee that your question or comment will be posted by the moderator or answered by the writer. If you hope for your question or comment to appear here and be answered or responded to, make sure it is civil, respectful, and “on topic.” Do not comment if you have not read the entire post and do not misrepresent what it says. Keep any comment (including questions) to minimal length; do not post essays, sermons or testimonies here. Do not post links to internet sites here. This is a space for expressions of the blogger’s (or guest writers’) opinions and constructive dialogue among evangelical Christians (very broadly defined).

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 28, 2020

A Question for Atheists and Those Inclined to It: About Incest

Next Post

October 6, 2020 Something Seriously Wrong with Much of American Christianity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Against Liberal Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I wanted a vineyard so badly that my wife arranged the owner's death through false witnesses. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

David Ahab Jezebel Naboth